Dual-language testing improves bilinguals' verbal scores.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2353409
Mercedes Fernandez, Maria Alejandra Chavez, Erika dlRM Cabrera Ranaldi, Samruddhi Ayachit, Melissa Friedman
{"title":"Dual-language testing improves bilinguals' verbal scores.","authors":"Mercedes Fernandez, Maria Alejandra Chavez, Erika dlRM Cabrera Ranaldi, Samruddhi Ayachit, Melissa Friedman","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2353409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Research demonstrates that college educated, English language dominant bilinguals underperform relative to English speaking monolinguals on tests of verbal ability. We investigated whether accepting responses in their two languages would reveal improved performance in bilinguals, and whether such improvement would be of sufficient magnitude to demonstrate the same performance level as monolinguals. <b>Method:</b> Participants were college students attending the same university. Spanish-English bilinguals were compared to English speaking monolinguals on the Bilingual Verbal Ability Tests (BVAT), which include <i>Picture Vocabulary</i>, <i>Oral Vocabulary</i>, and <i>Verbal Analogies</i>. <b>Results:</b> When given the opportunity to respond in Spanish to items failed in English, bilinguals obtained significantly higher scores on all three subtests, and their performance matched that of monolinguals on <i>Oral Vocabulary</i> and <i>Verbal Analogies</i>. <b>Conclusion:</b> An \"either-language\" scoring approach may enable optimal measurement of verbal abilities in bilinguals. We provide normative data for use in applying the either-language scoring approach on subtests of the BVAT. We discuss the findings in the context of clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2353409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Research demonstrates that college educated, English language dominant bilinguals underperform relative to English speaking monolinguals on tests of verbal ability. We investigated whether accepting responses in their two languages would reveal improved performance in bilinguals, and whether such improvement would be of sufficient magnitude to demonstrate the same performance level as monolinguals. Method: Participants were college students attending the same university. Spanish-English bilinguals were compared to English speaking monolinguals on the Bilingual Verbal Ability Tests (BVAT), which include Picture Vocabulary, Oral Vocabulary, and Verbal Analogies. Results: When given the opportunity to respond in Spanish to items failed in English, bilinguals obtained significantly higher scores on all three subtests, and their performance matched that of monolinguals on Oral Vocabulary and Verbal Analogies. Conclusion: An "either-language" scoring approach may enable optimal measurement of verbal abilities in bilinguals. We provide normative data for use in applying the either-language scoring approach on subtests of the BVAT. We discuss the findings in the context of clinical assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双语测试提高了双语学生的口头表达能力。
研究目的研究表明,受过大学教育、以英语为主的双语者在言语能力测试中的表现低于英语单语者。我们研究了接受双语者用两种语言做出的回答是否会显示出双语者成绩的提高,以及这种提高的幅度是否足以显示出与单语者相同的成绩水平。研究方法参与者为就读于同一所大学的大学生。在双语言语能力测试(BVAT)(包括图片词汇、口语词汇和言语类比)中,将西班牙语-英语双语者与英语单语者进行比较。测试结果当双语者有机会用西班牙语回答用英语答不上来的题目时,他们在所有三项测试中的得分都明显高于单语者,而且他们在口语词汇和言语类比方面的表现也与单语者相当。结论任选一种语言 "的评分方法可以对双语者的言语能力进行最佳测量。我们提供了常模数据,用于将 "任选一种语言 "计分法应用于 BVAT 的子测试。我们将结合临床评估对研究结果进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Large-scale evidence for the validity of remote MoCA administration among people with cerebellar ataxia. A clinical evaluation program to monitor neurocognitive risk in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Correction. Neuropsychology practice guidance for the neuropsychiatric aspects of Long COVID. The role of cognitive reserve and depression on executive function in older adults: A 10-year study from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1