Laboratory Considerations for Releasing Next-Generation Sequencing Data to Patients.

Ann Moyer, Eric Loo, Evan Cadoff, Eric Konnick, Helena Duncan, Jaimie Halley, Katherine Hermina, Patricia Vasalos, Joel T Moncur, Sophia Yohe
{"title":"Laboratory Considerations for Releasing Next-Generation Sequencing Data to Patients.","authors":"Ann Moyer, Eric Loo, Evan Cadoff, Eric Konnick, Helena Duncan, Jaimie Halley, Katherine Hermina, Patricia Vasalos, Joel T Moncur, Sophia Yohe","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0419-CP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Title 45, section 164.524 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that health care systems must provide patient health records upon that patient's request. For complex testing, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), this raises questions related to what data should be released and the laboratory considerations regarding the release of this data.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To describe the laboratory implications of releasing different NGS data files and the limitations for the clinical use of different NGS data files.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The College of American Pathologists workgroup, composed of laboratorians with expertise regarding NGS testing, reviewed pertinent literature, including title 45, section 164.524, and the Health and Human Services \"Guidance on Individuals' Right to Access Health Information.\"</p><p><strong>Result.—: </strong>From an accreditation standpoint, validation of NGS includes both the wet bench and data processing (bioinformatics) portions, and appropriately validated laboratory testing is required to ensure quality patient results. NGS testing generates intermediate data files that have not completed the fully validated process but are often kept by the laboratory. These files may be requested by patients, but most patients will not be aware of the test validation process and the limitations of data that have not gone through a fully validated process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Laboratories should encourage patients to receive their health data and to help individuals understand the content, uses, and limitations of laboratory data they have requested or received. NGS data used in a nonvalidated manner should not be used for clinical purposes without confirmation by a clinically validated method.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0419-CP","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Title 45, section 164.524 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that health care systems must provide patient health records upon that patient's request. For complex testing, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), this raises questions related to what data should be released and the laboratory considerations regarding the release of this data.

Objective.—: To describe the laboratory implications of releasing different NGS data files and the limitations for the clinical use of different NGS data files.

Design.—: The College of American Pathologists workgroup, composed of laboratorians with expertise regarding NGS testing, reviewed pertinent literature, including title 45, section 164.524, and the Health and Human Services "Guidance on Individuals' Right to Access Health Information."

Result.—: From an accreditation standpoint, validation of NGS includes both the wet bench and data processing (bioinformatics) portions, and appropriately validated laboratory testing is required to ensure quality patient results. NGS testing generates intermediate data files that have not completed the fully validated process but are often kept by the laboratory. These files may be requested by patients, but most patients will not be aware of the test validation process and the limitations of data that have not gone through a fully validated process.

Conclusions.—: Laboratories should encourage patients to receive their health data and to help individuals understand the content, uses, and limitations of laboratory data they have requested or received. NGS data used in a nonvalidated manner should not be used for clinical purposes without confirmation by a clinically validated method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验室向患者发布新一代测序数据的注意事项。
背景:联邦法规》第 45 篇第 164.524 节规定,医疗保健系统必须应患者要求提供其健康记录。对于下一代测序 (NGS) 等复杂检测,这就提出了应发布哪些数据以及发布这些数据的实验室注意事项等相关问题:描述发布不同 NGS 数据文件对实验室的影响,以及不同 NGS 数据文件对临床使用的限制:美国病理学家学会工作组由具有 NGS 检测专业知识的实验室人员组成,他们查阅了相关文献,包括第 45 篇第 164.524 节以及卫生与公众服务部《个人获取健康信息权利指南》:从评审的角度来看,NGS 的验证包括湿法工作台和数据处理(生物信息学)两部分,需要经过适当验证的实验室测试来确保患者结果的质量。NGS 检测生成的中间数据文件尚未完成完全验证过程,但通常由实验室保存。患者可能会要求提供这些文件,但大多数患者并不了解检验验证过程,也不了解未经过完全验证过程的数据的局限性:实验室应鼓励患者接收自己的健康数据,并帮助他们了解所请求或接收的实验室数据的内容、用途和局限性。未经临床验证方法确认的 NGS 数据不得用于临床目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A Review. Exploring the Incidence of Testicular Neoplasms in the Transgender Population: A Case Series. Global Pathology: A Snapshot of the Problems, the Progress, and the Potential. Pathologists Providing Direct Patient Care in Thoracic Transplant: Same Objective, Different Scope. The Impact of Pathologist Review on Peripheral Blood Smears: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 22 Laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1