A level playing field? Evaluation of the virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine: A mixed methods study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Australasian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1177/10398562241249567
Rebecca E Reay, Paul A Maguire, Jeffrey Cl Looi
{"title":"A level playing field? Evaluation of the virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Rebecca E Reay, Paul A Maguire, Jeffrey Cl Looi","doi":"10.1177/10398562241249567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has been used for clinical assessment of a broad range of medical student competencies in Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine. However, there has been little research into online assessments. We investigated the virtual OSCE (v-OSCE) from the user perspective to better understand its acceptability, usefulness, benefits, challenges and potential improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the conclusion of the v-OSCE, all participants (medical students, examiners and simulated patients) were invited to participate in a brief online survey, based on the Technology and Acceptance Model. Freeform qualitative feedback was also obtained to explore participants' experiences and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported the v-OSCE was acceptable, efficient, convenient and easy to use. It was perceived as useful for demonstrating students' interviewing skills and interacting with the simulated patient. Benefits included greater convenience, reduced stress and travel time. Challenges were similar to those experienced in 'real world' telepsychiatry, primarily related to assessment of non-verbal cues and emotional prosody.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings inform recommendations for improving online examinations. These include increased preparation, practice and professionalism, to better simulate the in-person experience. Study credibility was strengthened by the triangulation of qualitative, quantitative and psychometric data.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241249567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has been used for clinical assessment of a broad range of medical student competencies in Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine. However, there has been little research into online assessments. We investigated the virtual OSCE (v-OSCE) from the user perspective to better understand its acceptability, usefulness, benefits, challenges and potential improvements.

Methods: At the conclusion of the v-OSCE, all participants (medical students, examiners and simulated patients) were invited to participate in a brief online survey, based on the Technology and Acceptance Model. Freeform qualitative feedback was also obtained to explore participants' experiences and attitudes.

Results: Participants reported the v-OSCE was acceptable, efficient, convenient and easy to use. It was perceived as useful for demonstrating students' interviewing skills and interacting with the simulated patient. Benefits included greater convenience, reduced stress and travel time. Challenges were similar to those experienced in 'real world' telepsychiatry, primarily related to assessment of non-verbal cues and emotional prosody.

Conclusions: Our findings inform recommendations for improving online examinations. These include increased preparation, practice and professionalism, to better simulate the in-person experience. Study credibility was strengthened by the triangulation of qualitative, quantitative and psychometric data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平竞争?精神病学和成瘾医学虚拟客观结构化临床考试的评估:混合方法研究。
目的:客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)已被广泛用于精神病学和成瘾医学专业医学生能力的临床评估。然而,有关在线评估的研究却很少。我们从用户的角度对虚拟 OSCE(v-OSCE)进行了调查,以更好地了解其可接受性、实用性、优点、挑战和潜在改进之处:方法:在 v-OSCE 结束时,所有参与者(医学生、考官和模拟患者)都被邀请参加一项基于技术和接受度模型的简短在线调查。此外,还获得了自由形式的定性反馈,以探讨参与者的体验和态度:结果:参与者认为 v-OSCE 可以接受、高效、方便且易于使用。他们认为 v-OSCE 在展示学生的面谈技巧和与模拟病人互动方面非常有用。其优点包括更加方便、减少了压力和旅行时间。所面临的挑战与 "真实世界 "远程精神病学中遇到的挑战类似,主要与非语言线索和情感韵律的评估有关:我们的研究结果为改进在线考试提供了建议。结论:我们的研究结果为改进在线考试提供了建议,其中包括加强准备、练习和专业精神,以更好地模拟亲身体验。定性、定量和心理测量数据的三角测量增强了研究的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
期刊最新文献
Australian community and inpatient general public sector mental health services between 2017-18 and 2021-22: Relative stasis in bed capacity, increasing outpatient demand, and stunted expenditure. Oxytocin in old age psychiatry: A systematic review of the safety of using intranasal oxytocin in older adults. Effectiveness of long-acting buprenorphine - A systematic review. Making it real: Actioning the mental health strategy with Pacific Island communities. How evidence-based is the "hashtag ADHD test" (#adhdtest). A cross-sectional content analysis of TikTok videos on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1