Interventions aiming to improve advance care planning uptake in oncology: a scoping review of recent randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001045
Yves Libert, Caroline Langhendries, Lisa Choucroun, Isabelle Merckaert
{"title":"Interventions aiming to improve advance care planning uptake in oncology: a scoping review of recent randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yves Libert, Caroline Langhendries, Lisa Choucroun, Isabelle Merckaert","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions aiming to improve ACP uptake appears mixed. The purpose of this scoping review is to summarize findings from recent RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions designed to increase ACP uptake in cancer care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The PubMed database was searched for studies published between 2021 and 2023. Ten RCTs were identified that evaluated a wide range of interventions aimed at encouraging or facilitating ACP communication among patients with advanced cancer, caregivers, and HCPs. Three RCTs developed ACP facilitation tools for patients and sometimes caregivers. Six RCTs involved integrating trained ACP facilitators into patient care, and one RCT used nudges to encourage oncologists trained in ACP discussions to initiate discussions with patients at highest risk of short-term mortality. Most of the reviewed interventions were based on previously tested intervention approaches or tools.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The key effects identified in this review are the facilitation of ACP discussions among patients, caregivers, and HCPs, and the documentation of patient preferences in the medical record. The direct involvement of facilitators in ACP document drafting and inclusion in patient files, as well as interventions prompting end-of-life discussions, contributed to this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions aiming to improve ACP uptake appears mixed. The purpose of this scoping review is to summarize findings from recent RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions designed to increase ACP uptake in cancer care.

Recent findings: The PubMed database was searched for studies published between 2021 and 2023. Ten RCTs were identified that evaluated a wide range of interventions aimed at encouraging or facilitating ACP communication among patients with advanced cancer, caregivers, and HCPs. Three RCTs developed ACP facilitation tools for patients and sometimes caregivers. Six RCTs involved integrating trained ACP facilitators into patient care, and one RCT used nudges to encourage oncologists trained in ACP discussions to initiate discussions with patients at highest risk of short-term mortality. Most of the reviewed interventions were based on previously tested intervention approaches or tools.

Summary: The key effects identified in this review are the facilitation of ACP discussions among patients, caregivers, and HCPs, and the documentation of patient preferences in the medical record. The direct involvement of facilitators in ACP document drafting and inclusion in patient files, as well as interventions prompting end-of-life discussions, contributed to this effect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旨在提高肿瘤科预先护理计划采用率的干预措施:近期随机对照试验的范围界定综述。
审查目的:有关旨在提高 ACP 使用率的干预措施效果的证据似乎参差不齐。本范围综述旨在总结最近的 RCT 研究结果,这些研究评估了旨在提高癌症护理中 ACP 使用率的干预措施的有效性:在 PubMed 数据库中搜索了 2021 年至 2023 年间发表的研究。共发现了 10 项研究,这些研究评估了旨在鼓励或促进晚期癌症患者、护理人员和 HCP 之间进行 ACP 沟通的各种干预措施。三项研究为患者开发了 ACP 促进工具,有时也为护理人员开发了工具。六项 RCT 研究涉及将训练有素的 ACP 促进者纳入患者护理中,一项 RCT 研究采用暗示的方式鼓励接受过 ACP 讨论培训的肿瘤学家与短期死亡率风险最高的患者展开讨论。综述:本综述确定的主要效果是促进患者、护理人员和 HCP 之间的 ACP 讨论,并在病历中记录患者的偏好。促进者直接参与 ACP 文件的起草并将其纳入患者档案,以及促进生命末期讨论的干预措施都有助于产生这种效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Novel vaccines against lung cancer. Perioperative immunotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Thymic malignancies: role of immunotherapy and novel approaches. Endocrine therapy for early breast cancer in the era of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders: challenges and future perspectives. Lung cancer screening in never smokers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1