Health insurance among survivors of childhood cancer following Affordable Care Act implementation.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/jnci/djae111
Anne C Kirchhoff, Austin R Waters, Qi Liu, Xu Ji, Yutaka Yasui, K Robin Yabroff, Rena M Conti, I-Chan Huang, Tara Henderson, Wendy M Leisenring, Gregory T Armstrong, Paul C Nathan, Elyse R Park
{"title":"Health insurance among survivors of childhood cancer following Affordable Care Act implementation.","authors":"Anne C Kirchhoff, Austin R Waters, Qi Liu, Xu Ji, Yutaka Yasui, K Robin Yabroff, Rena M Conti, I-Chan Huang, Tara Henderson, Wendy M Leisenring, Gregory T Armstrong, Paul C Nathan, Elyse R Park","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased private nonemployer health insurance options, expanded Medicaid eligibility, and provided preexisting health condition protections. We evaluated insurance coverage among long-term adult survivors of childhood cancer pre- and post-ACA implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the multicenter Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we included participants from 2 cross-sectional surveys: pre-ACA (2007-2009; survivors: n = 7505; siblings: n = 2175) and post-ACA (2017-2019; survivors: n = 4030; siblings: n = 987). A subset completed both surveys (1840 survivors; 646 siblings). Multivariable regression models compared post-ACA insurance coverage and type (private, public, uninsured) between survivors and siblings and identified associated demographic and clinical factors. Multinomial models compared gaining and losing insurance vs staying the same among survivors and siblings who participated in both surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion with insurance was higher post-ACA (survivors pre-ACA 89.1% to post-ACA 92.0% [+2.9%]; siblings pre-ACA 90.9% to post-ACA 95.3% [+4.4%]). Post-ACA insurance increase in coverage was higher among those aged 18-25 years (survivors: +15.8% vs +2.3% or less ages 26 years and older; siblings +17.8% vs +4.2% or less ages 26 years and older). Survivors were more likely to have public insurance than siblings post-ACA (18.4% vs 6.9%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 2.6). Survivors with severe chronic conditions (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 3.0 to 7.3) and those living in Medicaid expansion states (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 3.4) had increased odds of public insurance coverage post-ACA. Among the subset completing both surveys, low- and mid-income survivors (<$40 000 and <$60 000, respectively) experienced insurance losses and gains in reference to highest household income survivors (≥$100 000), relative to odds of keeping the same insurance status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-ACA, more childhood cancer survivors and siblings had health insurance, although disparities remain in coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased private nonemployer health insurance options, expanded Medicaid eligibility, and provided preexisting health condition protections. We evaluated insurance coverage among long-term adult survivors of childhood cancer pre- and post-ACA implementation.

Methods: Using the multicenter Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we included participants from 2 cross-sectional surveys: pre-ACA (2007-2009; survivors: n = 7505; siblings: n = 2175) and post-ACA (2017-2019; survivors: n = 4030; siblings: n = 987). A subset completed both surveys (1840 survivors; 646 siblings). Multivariable regression models compared post-ACA insurance coverage and type (private, public, uninsured) between survivors and siblings and identified associated demographic and clinical factors. Multinomial models compared gaining and losing insurance vs staying the same among survivors and siblings who participated in both surveys.

Results: The proportion with insurance was higher post-ACA (survivors pre-ACA 89.1% to post-ACA 92.0% [+2.9%]; siblings pre-ACA 90.9% to post-ACA 95.3% [+4.4%]). Post-ACA insurance increase in coverage was higher among those aged 18-25 years (survivors: +15.8% vs +2.3% or less ages 26 years and older; siblings +17.8% vs +4.2% or less ages 26 years and older). Survivors were more likely to have public insurance than siblings post-ACA (18.4% vs 6.9%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 2.6). Survivors with severe chronic conditions (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 3.0 to 7.3) and those living in Medicaid expansion states (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 3.4) had increased odds of public insurance coverage post-ACA. Among the subset completing both surveys, low- and mid-income survivors (<$40 000 and <$60 000, respectively) experienced insurance losses and gains in reference to highest household income survivors (≥$100 000), relative to odds of keeping the same insurance status.

Conclusions: Post-ACA, more childhood cancer survivors and siblings had health insurance, although disparities remain in coverage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施可负担医疗法案后儿童癌症幸存者的医疗保险。
背景:平价医疗法案》(ACA)增加了私人非雇主医疗保险选择、扩大了医疗补助资格并提供了既往健康状况保护。我们评估了《可负担医疗法案》实施前后儿童癌症长期成年幸存者的保险覆盖情况:利用多中心儿童癌症幸存者研究,我们纳入了两项横断面调查的参与者:ACA 实施前(2007-2009 年;幸存者:N = 7,505 人;兄弟姐妹:N = 2,175 人)和 ACA 实施后(2017-2019 年;幸存者:N = 4,030 人;兄弟姐妹:N = 987 人)。一部分人同时完成了两项调查(1,840 名幸存者;646 名兄弟姐妹)。多变量回归模型比较了幸存者和兄弟姐妹在 ACA 后的保险范围和类型(私人/公共/无保险),并确定了相关的人口统计学和临床因素。多项式模型比较了参加两次调查的幸存者和兄弟姐妹中获得和失去保险与保持不变的情况:结果:ACA 后获得保险的比例更高(ACA 前的幸存者为 89.1%,ACA 后为 92.0% [+2.9%];ACA 前的兄弟姐妹为 90.9%,ACA 后为 95.3% [+4.4%])。美国儿童癌症保险法案》实施后,18-25 岁人群的保险覆盖率更高(幸存者:15.8% vs 结论:15.8%[+2.9%]):在《美国儿童医疗保险法案》颁布后,更多的儿童癌症幸存者和兄弟姐妹拥有了医疗保险,但在覆盖率方面仍存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Capacity for Primary Care Research in Cancer Survivorship: National Cancer Institute Meeting Report. Expression of Concern: Delta-Like Ligand 4-Notch Blockade and Tumor Radiation Response. The Diverse Aspects of Uterine Serous Cancer: An NCI workshop on the status of and opportunities for advancement of research. Expression of Concern: Critical Role for Fas-Associated Death Domain-Like Interleukin-1-Converting Enzyme-Like Inhibitory Protein in Anoikis Resistance and Distant Tumor Formation. Comparing characteristics of individuals screened for lung cancer with 2021 vs 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1