Audit of a Revised Pathway Aimed at Expediting Diagnosis and Treatment for Suspected Achilles Tendon Rupture

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.002
{"title":"Audit of a Revised Pathway Aimed at Expediting Diagnosis and Treatment for Suspected Achilles Tendon Rupture","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Treatment outcomes for Achilles tendon ruptures<span> depend upon prompt diagnosis and management. A local study in 2018 highlighted inefficiencies in patient management, and a revised protocol was introduced allowing investigation and referral to be initiated by other healthcare professionals. This retrospective audit evaluates the impact of this on the timescale from presentation to treatment. It analyzes all suspected Achilles tendon ruptures within one District General Hospital from April 2021 to March 2022. Data regarding patient timelines was compared to the 2018 study. Over 12 months, 99 patients were referred to Virtual Fracture Clinic, 87.8% (</span></span><em>n</em> = 87) of which had a complete or partial tear on ultrasound scan (USS). In comparison to 2018, the average time from presentation to USS request reduced from 2.9 to 1.1 days (<em>p &lt; .</em>01). 95% were scanned within one week of USS request and 31.3% within 48 hours (81% and 18%, previously). The average time from USS request to scan went from 6.8 to 3.2 days (<em>p &lt; .</em>01). The time from presentation to treatment decision reduced from 10.9 to 6.2 days (<em>p &lt; .</em>01) and the percentage of patients with a definitive treatment plan within one week increased from 34.5% to 74.2% (<em>p &lt; .</em>01). Patients required 0.8 fewer appointments (<em>p &lt; .</em>01) giving an estimated total saving of $10,110 ($128 per patient) during the analyzed period. The Achilles Tendon Rupture Pathway has significantly improved the proportion of patients undergoing USS within 48 hours and receiving a treatment decision within one week. This study demonstrates an efficient, cost-saving and replicable pathway for Achilles tendon ruptures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067251624000917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment outcomes for Achilles tendon ruptures depend upon prompt diagnosis and management. A local study in 2018 highlighted inefficiencies in patient management, and a revised protocol was introduced allowing investigation and referral to be initiated by other healthcare professionals. This retrospective audit evaluates the impact of this on the timescale from presentation to treatment. It analyzes all suspected Achilles tendon ruptures within one District General Hospital from April 2021 to March 2022. Data regarding patient timelines was compared to the 2018 study. Over 12 months, 99 patients were referred to Virtual Fracture Clinic, 87.8% (n = 87) of which had a complete or partial tear on ultrasound scan (USS). In comparison to 2018, the average time from presentation to USS request reduced from 2.9 to 1.1 days (p < .01). 95% were scanned within one week of USS request and 31.3% within 48 hours (81% and 18%, previously). The average time from USS request to scan went from 6.8 to 3.2 days (p < .01). The time from presentation to treatment decision reduced from 10.9 to 6.2 days (p < .01) and the percentage of patients with a definitive treatment plan within one week increased from 34.5% to 74.2% (p < .01). Patients required 0.8 fewer appointments (p < .01) giving an estimated total saving of $10,110 ($128 per patient) during the analyzed period. The Achilles Tendon Rupture Pathway has significantly improved the proportion of patients undergoing USS within 48 hours and receiving a treatment decision within one week. This study demonstrates an efficient, cost-saving and replicable pathway for Achilles tendon ruptures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对旨在加快诊断和治疗疑似跟腱断裂的修订路径进行审计。
跟腱断裂的治疗效果取决于及时的诊断和管理。2018 年的一项地方研究强调了患者管理的低效率,并推出了一项修订协议,允许由其他医疗专业人员启动调查和转诊。这项回顾性审计评估了这对从就诊到治疗的时间范围的影响。它分析了一家地区综合医院在 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间发生的所有疑似跟腱断裂病例。有关患者时限的数据与 2018 年的研究进行了比较。在 12 个月内,99 名患者被转诊至虚拟骨折门诊,其中 87.8%(n=87)的患者在超声波扫描(USS)中出现完全或部分撕裂。与 2018 年相比,从就诊到申请 USS 的平均时间从 2.9 天减少到 1.1 天(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
期刊最新文献
Concomitant osteochondral lesion of the talus in ankle instability: Utilizing clinical presentation to guide imaging decision. Diabetic Foot Infection Severity as a Predictor of Re-ulceration Following Partial Forefoot Amputation. Predictive factors to return to sport after surgical management of ankle fractures. Reply to: EVALUATION OF THE HEALING STATUS OF LATERAL ANKLE LIGAMENTS SIX WEEKS AFTER AN ACUTE ANKLE SPRAIN. Fillet of toe flap coverage for non-traumatic foot amputations: A retrospective review of 70 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1