Evaluation of Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels and Effect of Tobacco Smoking in Periodontally Diseased Non-Diabetic Patients.

International Journal of MCH and AIDS Pub Date : 2024-05-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/IJMA_5
Sakshi Gaind, D K Suresh, Amrinder Tuli
{"title":"Evaluation of Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels and Effect of Tobacco Smoking in Periodontally Diseased Non-Diabetic Patients.","authors":"Sakshi Gaind, D K Suresh, Amrinder Tuli","doi":"10.25259/IJMA_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Chronic diseases have progressively increased worldwide, impacting all areas and socioeconomic groups. Periodontal disease is an increasing global concern and contains risk factors similar to other chronic illnesses. The main risk factor for periodontitis is smoking. Smoking not only hastens periodontal disease but also complicates periodontal therapy. Serum glycosylated hemoglobin levels, which are derived from the average life span of an erythrocyte, are a good indicator of glycemic management during the preceding one to three months. This study was undertaken to assess the association between tobacco smoking and periodontal disease by evaluating plaque score, gingival score, extent and severity index (ESI), and glycemic status by estimating serum HbA1c in cigarette smoker patients compared to non-smokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 40 patients in the age range of 20-40 years. Patients were divided into two groups: non-smokers (Group I) and cigarette smokers (Group II). Periodontal clinical parameters such as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and ESI were recorded during the oral cavity examination. The biochemical marker, serum glycosylated hemoglobin, was measured in both groups. All parameters were measured at baseline and three months after periodontal therapy. The statistical tests used were the paired <i>t-test</i>, and <i>Chi-square</i> test for comparison between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference of PI of non-smokers was 0.33 ± 0.30, and smokers were 0.52 ± 0.32, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of GI of non-smokers was 0.34 ± 0.19 and smokers 0.36 ± 0.303, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of extent in non-smokers was 5.33 ± 1.59, 5.52 ± 2.43, and smokers were 0.18 ± 0.17. The mean difference in severity in non-smokers was 0.18 ± 0.17, and smokers were 0.31 ± 0.25, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of HbA1c in non-smokers and smokers was 0.43 ± 0.277 and 0.415 ± 0.230, which shows a higher mean difference in non-smokers, which was statistically non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and global health implications: </strong>This study concluded that each of Group I and Group II showed substantial improvements in all clinical periodontal variables, which include plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), extent and severity index (ESI), and biochemical marker serum glycosylated hemoglobin. Controlling inflammation with SRP can improve insulin resistance, lower glucose levels, and prevent non-enzymatic glycation of hemoglobin.</p>","PeriodicalId":30480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of MCH and AIDS","volume":"13 ","pages":"e007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of MCH and AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMA_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Chronic diseases have progressively increased worldwide, impacting all areas and socioeconomic groups. Periodontal disease is an increasing global concern and contains risk factors similar to other chronic illnesses. The main risk factor for periodontitis is smoking. Smoking not only hastens periodontal disease but also complicates periodontal therapy. Serum glycosylated hemoglobin levels, which are derived from the average life span of an erythrocyte, are a good indicator of glycemic management during the preceding one to three months. This study was undertaken to assess the association between tobacco smoking and periodontal disease by evaluating plaque score, gingival score, extent and severity index (ESI), and glycemic status by estimating serum HbA1c in cigarette smoker patients compared to non-smokers.

Methods: The study was conducted with 40 patients in the age range of 20-40 years. Patients were divided into two groups: non-smokers (Group I) and cigarette smokers (Group II). Periodontal clinical parameters such as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and ESI were recorded during the oral cavity examination. The biochemical marker, serum glycosylated hemoglobin, was measured in both groups. All parameters were measured at baseline and three months after periodontal therapy. The statistical tests used were the paired t-test, and Chi-square test for comparison between both groups.

Results: The mean difference of PI of non-smokers was 0.33 ± 0.30, and smokers were 0.52 ± 0.32, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of GI of non-smokers was 0.34 ± 0.19 and smokers 0.36 ± 0.303, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of extent in non-smokers was 5.33 ± 1.59, 5.52 ± 2.43, and smokers were 0.18 ± 0.17. The mean difference in severity in non-smokers was 0.18 ± 0.17, and smokers were 0.31 ± 0.25, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of HbA1c in non-smokers and smokers was 0.43 ± 0.277 and 0.415 ± 0.230, which shows a higher mean difference in non-smokers, which was statistically non-significant.

Conclusion and global health implications: This study concluded that each of Group I and Group II showed substantial improvements in all clinical periodontal variables, which include plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), extent and severity index (ESI), and biochemical marker serum glycosylated hemoglobin. Controlling inflammation with SRP can improve insulin resistance, lower glucose levels, and prevent non-enzymatic glycation of hemoglobin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估牙周病非糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白水平和吸烟的影响。
背景和目的:慢性疾病在全球范围内逐渐增多,影响到所有地区和社会经济群体。牙周病是全球日益关注的问题,其风险因素与其他慢性疾病类似。牙周炎的主要风险因素是吸烟。吸烟不仅会加速牙周病,还会使牙周治疗复杂化。血清糖化血红蛋白水平是根据红细胞的平均寿命推算出来的,是前一至三个月血糖管理的良好指标。本研究通过评估吸烟者与非吸烟者的牙菌斑评分、牙龈评分、范围和严重程度指数(ESI),以及通过估算血清 HbA1c 来评估吸烟者与非吸烟者的血糖状况,从而评估吸烟与牙周疾病之间的关系:研究对象为 40 名年龄在 20-40 岁之间的患者。患者分为两组:非吸烟者(I 组)和吸烟者(II 组)。在口腔检查过程中记录牙周临床参数,如牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和ESI。两组均测量了生化指标--血清糖化血红蛋白。所有参数均在基线和牙周治疗三个月后进行测量。两组间的比较采用配对 t 检验和卡方检验:结果:非吸烟者的 PI 平均值为 0.33 ± 0.30,吸烟者为 0.52 ± 0.32,差异有统计学意义。非吸烟者的 GI 平均值为 0.34 ± 0.19,吸烟者为 0.36 ± 0.303,差异有统计学意义。非吸烟者的平均程度差异为 5.33 ± 1.59,吸烟者为 5.52 ± 2.43,非吸烟者为 0.18 ± 0.17。非吸烟者严重程度的平均差异为 0.18 ± 0.17,吸烟者为 0.31 ± 0.25,差异有统计学意义。非吸烟者和吸烟者的 HbA1c 平均值分别为 0.43 ± 0.277 和 0.415 ± 0.230,非吸烟者的平均值差异较大,但在统计学上无意义:本研究得出结论,第一组和第二组在所有临床牙周变量(包括牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、范围和严重程度指数(ESI)以及生化指标血清糖化血红蛋白)方面均有显著改善。使用 SRP 控制炎症可以改善胰岛素抵抗,降低血糖水平,防止血红蛋白的非酶糖化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Obstetric Analgesia in Labor Management: Assessing Knowledge and Usage Among Midwives in North-Central Nigeria. Improving HIV Prevention for Key Populations in Nigeria: Insights on Access, Barriers, Stigma, and Service Utilization. Long-acting Antiretroviral Agents in the Prevention and Treatment of HIV/AIDS: A Review of Recent Advances in Sub-Saharan Africa. Implementing WHO Differentiated Service Delivery Model for Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women and Infants Living with HIV: Insights from Kenyan Healthcare Providers. HIV Testing, Household and Reproductive Health Decision-Making: The Role of Women Autonomy in a Nationally Representative Study in Cambodia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1