Managing Multiple Chronic Conditions during COVID-19 Among Patients with Social Health Risks.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230053R2
Leah Tuzzio, Kathy S Gleason, James D Ralston, Melanie Drace, Marlaine Figueroa Gray, Ruth Bedoy, Jennifer L Ellis, Richard W Grant, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Leslie Jauregui, Zoe A Bermet
{"title":"Managing Multiple Chronic Conditions during COVID-19 Among Patients with Social Health Risks.","authors":"Leah Tuzzio, Kathy S Gleason, James D Ralston, Melanie Drace, Marlaine Figueroa Gray, Ruth Bedoy, Jennifer L Ellis, Richard W Grant, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Leslie Jauregui, Zoe A Bermet","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230053R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal care for persons with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) requires primary and specialty care continuity, access to multiple providers, social risk assessment, and self-management support. The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly changed primary care delivery to increase reliance on telehealth and virtual care. We report on the experiences of individuals with MCC and their family caregivers on managing their health and receiving health care during the initial pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews with 30 patients (19 English speaking, 11 Spanish speaking) plus 9 accompanying care partners, who had 2+ primary care encounters between March 1, 2020, and November 30, 2020, 2+ chronic conditions, and 1 or more self-reported social risks. Questions focused on access to and experiences with care, roles for care partners, and self-management during the first 6 months of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants experienced substantial changes in care delivery. The most commonly reported changes were a shift to more virtual relative to in-person care and shifting roles for care partners. Changes fostered new perspectives on self-management and an appreciation of personal resilience and self-reliance. Virtual care was an acceptable complement to in-person care, though not a substitute for periodic in-person visits. It was more acceptable for English speakers and with a usual provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New models of care delivery that recognize patient and family resilience and resourcefulness, emphasize provider continuity, and combine virtual and in-person care may support self-management for individuals with MCC and social needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 2","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230053R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimal care for persons with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) requires primary and specialty care continuity, access to multiple providers, social risk assessment, and self-management support. The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly changed primary care delivery to increase reliance on telehealth and virtual care. We report on the experiences of individuals with MCC and their family caregivers on managing their health and receiving health care during the initial pandemic.

Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews with 30 patients (19 English speaking, 11 Spanish speaking) plus 9 accompanying care partners, who had 2+ primary care encounters between March 1, 2020, and November 30, 2020, 2+ chronic conditions, and 1 or more self-reported social risks. Questions focused on access to and experiences with care, roles for care partners, and self-management during the first 6 months of the pandemic.

Results: Participants experienced substantial changes in care delivery. The most commonly reported changes were a shift to more virtual relative to in-person care and shifting roles for care partners. Changes fostered new perspectives on self-management and an appreciation of personal resilience and self-reliance. Virtual care was an acceptable complement to in-person care, though not a substitute for periodic in-person visits. It was more acceptable for English speakers and with a usual provider.

Conclusion: New models of care delivery that recognize patient and family resilience and resourcefulness, emphasize provider continuity, and combine virtual and in-person care may support self-management for individuals with MCC and social needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有社会健康风险的患者在 COVID-19 期间管理多种慢性病。
背景:为患有多种慢性病 (MCC) 的人提供最佳护理需要初级和专科护理的连续性、获得多个医疗服务提供者的服务、社会风险评估以及自我管理支持。COVID-19 大流行突然改变了初级医疗服务,增加了对远程医疗和虚拟医疗的依赖。我们报告了 MCC 患者及其家庭照顾者在最初的大流行期间管理健康和接受医疗保健的经验:对 30 名患者(19 名讲英语,11 名讲西班牙语)和 9 名陪同护理伙伴进行了半结构化定性访谈,这些患者在 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间接受过 2 次以上初级医疗服务,患有 2 种以上慢性疾病,并自我报告了 1 种或更多的社会风险。问题主要集中在大流行头 6 个月期间获得护理的机会和经验、护理伙伴的角色以及自我管理等方面:结果:参与者在护理服务方面经历了巨大的变化。最常报告的变化是,相对于面对面的医疗服务,更多的是转向虚拟医疗服务,以及医疗合作伙伴角色的转变。这些变化促进了对自我管理的新认识,以及对个人复原力和自立能力的重视。虚拟护理是可以接受的对亲身护理的补充,但不能取代定期的亲身探访。对于英语使用者和惯常的医疗服务提供者来说,虚拟医疗更容易接受:结论:新的护理提供模式承认病人和家庭的适应能力和机智,强调提供者的连续性,并将虚拟护理和面对面护理结合起来,可以支持有 MCC 和社会需求的个人进行自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1