Marie Heiber, Andrea Schittenhelm, Jennifer Schlie, Marcus Beckert, Pascal Graf, Annette Schmidt
{"title":"Garmin Fénix 7<sup>®</sup> Underestimates Performance at the Lactate Threshold in Comparison to Standardized Blood Lactate Field Test.","authors":"Marie Heiber, Andrea Schittenhelm, Jennifer Schlie, Marcus Beckert, Pascal Graf, Annette Schmidt","doi":"10.2147/OAJSM.S444568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lactate threshold (LT) is a critical performance measure traditionally obtained using costly laboratory-based tests. Wearables offer a practical and noninvasive alternative for LT assessment in recreational and professional athletes. However, the comparability of these estimates with the regular field tests requires further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In our sample of 26 participants (n<sub>f</sub>=7 and n<sub>m</sub>=19), we compared the estimated running pace and heart rate (HR) at LT with two subsequent tests. First, participants performed the Fenix 7<sup>®</sup> threshold running test after a calibration phase. Subsequently, they were tested in a standardized, graded blood lactate field test. Age was 25.97 (± 6.26) years, and body mass index (BMI) was 24.58 (± 2.8) kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pace at LT calculated by Fenix 7<sup>®</sup> (<i>M</i>=11.87 km/h ± 1.26 km/h) was 11.96% lower compared to the field test (<i>M</i>=13.28 km/h ± 1.72 km/h), which was significant (<i>p</i> <0.001, <i>d</i>=-1.19). HR estimated by the Fenix 7<sup>®</sup> at LT was 1.71% lower (p >0.05). LT data obtained in the field test showed greater overall variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest sufficient accuracy of Fenix 7<sup>®</sup> LT estimates for recreational athletes. It can be assumed that for professional athletes, it would fail to provide the nuanced data needed for high-quality training management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51644,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S444568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Lactate threshold (LT) is a critical performance measure traditionally obtained using costly laboratory-based tests. Wearables offer a practical and noninvasive alternative for LT assessment in recreational and professional athletes. However, the comparability of these estimates with the regular field tests requires further evaluation.
Patients and methods: In our sample of 26 participants (nf=7 and nm=19), we compared the estimated running pace and heart rate (HR) at LT with two subsequent tests. First, participants performed the Fenix 7® threshold running test after a calibration phase. Subsequently, they were tested in a standardized, graded blood lactate field test. Age was 25.97 (± 6.26) years, and body mass index (BMI) was 24.58 (± 2.8) kg/m2.
Results: Pace at LT calculated by Fenix 7® (M=11.87 km/h ± 1.26 km/h) was 11.96% lower compared to the field test (M=13.28 km/h ± 1.72 km/h), which was significant (p <0.001, d=-1.19). HR estimated by the Fenix 7® at LT was 1.71% lower (p >0.05). LT data obtained in the field test showed greater overall variance.
Conclusion: Our results suggest sufficient accuracy of Fenix 7® LT estimates for recreational athletes. It can be assumed that for professional athletes, it would fail to provide the nuanced data needed for high-quality training management.