Single-value brain activity scores reflect both severity and risk across the Alzheimer's continuum.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae149
Joram Soch, Anni Richter, Jasmin M Kizilirmak, Hartmut Schütze, Gabriel Ziegler, Slawek Altenstein, Frederic Brosseron, Peter Dechent, Klaus Fliessbach, Silka Dawn Freiesleben, Wenzel Glanz, Daria Gref, Michael T Heneka, Stefan Hetzer, Enise I Incesoy, Ingo Kilimann, Okka Kimmich, Luca Kleineidam, Elizabeth Kuhn, Christoph Laske, Andrea Lohse, Falk Lüsebrink, Matthias H Munk, Oliver Peters, Lukas Preis, Josef Priller, Alfredo Ramirez, Sandra Roeske, Ayda Rostamzadeh, Nina Roy-Kluth, Klaus Scheffler, Matthias Schmid, Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Eike Jakob Spruth, Stefan Teipel, Jens Wiltfang, Frank Jessen, Michael Wagner, Emrah Düzel, Björn H Schott
{"title":"Single-value brain activity scores reflect both severity and risk across the Alzheimer's continuum.","authors":"Joram Soch, Anni Richter, Jasmin M Kizilirmak, Hartmut Schütze, Gabriel Ziegler, Slawek Altenstein, Frederic Brosseron, Peter Dechent, Klaus Fliessbach, Silka Dawn Freiesleben, Wenzel Glanz, Daria Gref, Michael T Heneka, Stefan Hetzer, Enise I Incesoy, Ingo Kilimann, Okka Kimmich, Luca Kleineidam, Elizabeth Kuhn, Christoph Laske, Andrea Lohse, Falk Lüsebrink, Matthias H Munk, Oliver Peters, Lukas Preis, Josef Priller, Alfredo Ramirez, Sandra Roeske, Ayda Rostamzadeh, Nina Roy-Kluth, Klaus Scheffler, Matthias Schmid, Anja Schneider, Annika Spottke, Eike Jakob Spruth, Stefan Teipel, Jens Wiltfang, Frank Jessen, Michael Wagner, Emrah Düzel, Björn H Schott","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-value scores reflecting the deviation from (FADE score) or similarity with (SAME score) prototypical novelty-related and memory-related functional MRI activation patterns in young adults have been proposed as imaging biomarkers of healthy neurocognitive ageing. Here, we tested the utility of these scores as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and risk states like mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or subjective cognitive decline (SCD). To this end, we analysed subsequent memory functional MRI data from individuals with SCD, MCI and AD dementia as well as healthy controls and first-degree relatives of AD dementia patients (AD-rel) who participated in the multi-centre DELCODE study (n = 468). Based on the individual participants' whole-brain functional MRI novelty and subsequent memory responses, we calculated the FADE and SAME scores and assessed their association with AD risk stage, neuropsychological test scores, CSF amyloid positivity and APOE genotype. Memory-based FADE and SAME scores showed a considerably larger deviation from a reference sample of young adults in the MCI and AD dementia groups compared to healthy controls, SCD and AD-rel. In addition, novelty-based scores significantly differed between the MCI and AD dementia groups. Across the entire sample, single-value scores correlated with neuropsychological test performance. The novelty-based SAME score further differed between Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative individuals in SCD and AD-rel, and between ApoE ɛ4 carriers and non-carriers in AD-rel. Hence, FADE and SAME scores are associated with both cognitive performance and individual risk factors for AD. Their potential utility as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers warrants further exploration, particularly in individuals with SCD and healthy relatives of AD dementia patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-value scores reflecting the deviation from (FADE score) or similarity with (SAME score) prototypical novelty-related and memory-related functional MRI activation patterns in young adults have been proposed as imaging biomarkers of healthy neurocognitive ageing. Here, we tested the utility of these scores as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and risk states like mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or subjective cognitive decline (SCD). To this end, we analysed subsequent memory functional MRI data from individuals with SCD, MCI and AD dementia as well as healthy controls and first-degree relatives of AD dementia patients (AD-rel) who participated in the multi-centre DELCODE study (n = 468). Based on the individual participants' whole-brain functional MRI novelty and subsequent memory responses, we calculated the FADE and SAME scores and assessed their association with AD risk stage, neuropsychological test scores, CSF amyloid positivity and APOE genotype. Memory-based FADE and SAME scores showed a considerably larger deviation from a reference sample of young adults in the MCI and AD dementia groups compared to healthy controls, SCD and AD-rel. In addition, novelty-based scores significantly differed between the MCI and AD dementia groups. Across the entire sample, single-value scores correlated with neuropsychological test performance. The novelty-based SAME score further differed between Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative individuals in SCD and AD-rel, and between ApoE ɛ4 carriers and non-carriers in AD-rel. Hence, FADE and SAME scores are associated with both cognitive performance and individual risk factors for AD. Their potential utility as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers warrants further exploration, particularly in individuals with SCD and healthy relatives of AD dementia patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单值大脑活动评分反映了阿尔茨海默氏症的严重程度和风险。
有人提出将反映青壮年新奇相关和记忆相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)激活模式偏离(FADE 评分)或相似(SAME 评分)原型的单值评分作为健康神经认知老化的成像生物标志物。在此,我们测试了这些评分作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)或主观认知能力下降(SCD)等风险状态的潜在诊断和预后标志物的实用性。为此,我们分析了参与多中心 DELCODE 研究(N = 468)的 SCD、MCI 和 AD 痴呆症患者以及健康对照组(HC)和 AD 痴呆症患者一级亲属(AD-rel)的后续记忆 fMRI 数据。根据个体参与者的全脑 fMRI 新颖性和随后的记忆反应,我们计算出了 FADE 和 SAME 分数,并评估了它们与 AD 风险阶段、神经心理学测试分数、CSF 淀粉样蛋白阳性率和载脂蛋白 E 基因型之间的关联。与HC、SCD和AD-rel相比,在MCI和AD痴呆组中,基于记忆的FADE和SAME评分与年轻成人参考样本的偏差要大得多。此外,MCI 和 AD 痴呆症组之间基于新奇度的评分也存在显著差异。在整个样本中,单值得分与神经心理测试成绩相关。在SCD和AD痴呆组中,Aβ阳性和Aβ阴性个体之间,以及在AD痴呆组中,载脂蛋白E ε4携带者和非载脂蛋白E ε4携带者之间,基于新奇感的SAME评分存在进一步差异。因此,FADE 和 SAME 评分既与认知能力有关,也与 AD 的个体风险因素有关。它们作为诊断和预后生物标志物的潜在作用值得进一步探索,尤其是在SCD患者和AD痴呆患者的健康亲属中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Transient brain structure changes after high phenylalanine exposure in adults with phenylketonuria. Low-intensity ultrasound ameliorates brain organoid integration and rescues microcephaly deficits. A mutation in the PRKAR1B gene drives pathological mechanisms of neurodegeneration across species. Single-value brain activity scores reflect both severity and risk across the Alzheimer's continuum. Subthalamic control of impulsive actions: insights from deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1