Assessment of the phenotypic severity of hemophilia A: using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and APTT-clot waveform analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Blood Research Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1007/s44313-024-00018-6
Deepika Gupta, Vandana Arya, Jasmita Dass, Nitin Gupta, Manas Kalra, Anupam Sachdeva, Jyoti Kotwal
{"title":"Assessment of the phenotypic severity of hemophilia A: using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and APTT-clot waveform analysis.","authors":"Deepika Gupta, Vandana Arya, Jasmita Dass, Nitin Gupta, Manas Kalra, Anupam Sachdeva, Jyoti Kotwal","doi":"10.1007/s44313-024-00018-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by reduced factor VIII (FVIII) levels. Approximately 10-15% of patients with severe HA (SHA) do not present with the anticipated bleeding pattern. Here, we assessed the phenotypic severity of hemophilia A using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and activated partial thromboplastin time-clot waveform analysis (APTT-CWA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with hemophilia A were enrolled. Clinical phenotype assignment was performed according to the published literature, and patients were classified into four phenotypic subgroups. The whole blood sample was first run on ROTEM in INTEM mode using platelet-poor plasma, APTT was run, and the APTT-CWA graph was simultaneously recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 patients were recruited for this study. Statistically significant differences were observed between the four phenotypically categorized groups using ROTEM and APTT-CWA. On comparing patients with mild/moderate-to-severe phenotypes (Group II) with SHA without inhibitors (Group IV), no significant difference was found for all parameters of ROTEM or APTT-CWA. The MCF, MA30, MAXV, and Alpha angle values using ROTEM were found to be the lowest in patients with SHA with inhibitors, which helped differentiate them from those with SHA without inhibitors. However, these two groups could not be differentiated using the APTT-CWA parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROTEM can be used to distinguish patients with SHA with inhibitors from those with SHA without inhibitors using a combination of parameters with high sensitivity and specificity. However, APTT-CWA cannot be used to differentiate these patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-024-00018-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by reduced factor VIII (FVIII) levels. Approximately 10-15% of patients with severe HA (SHA) do not present with the anticipated bleeding pattern. Here, we assessed the phenotypic severity of hemophilia A using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and activated partial thromboplastin time-clot waveform analysis (APTT-CWA).

Methods: Patients diagnosed with hemophilia A were enrolled. Clinical phenotype assignment was performed according to the published literature, and patients were classified into four phenotypic subgroups. The whole blood sample was first run on ROTEM in INTEM mode using platelet-poor plasma, APTT was run, and the APTT-CWA graph was simultaneously recorded.

Results: A total of 66 patients were recruited for this study. Statistically significant differences were observed between the four phenotypically categorized groups using ROTEM and APTT-CWA. On comparing patients with mild/moderate-to-severe phenotypes (Group II) with SHA without inhibitors (Group IV), no significant difference was found for all parameters of ROTEM or APTT-CWA. The MCF, MA30, MAXV, and Alpha angle values using ROTEM were found to be the lowest in patients with SHA with inhibitors, which helped differentiate them from those with SHA without inhibitors. However, these two groups could not be differentiated using the APTT-CWA parameters.

Conclusion: ROTEM can be used to distinguish patients with SHA with inhibitors from those with SHA without inhibitors using a combination of parameters with high sensitivity and specificity. However, APTT-CWA cannot be used to differentiate these patient groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估血友病 A 的表型严重程度:使用旋转血栓弹性测定法 (ROTEM) 和 APTT-凝血波形分析法。
背景:血友病 A(HA)是一种 X 连锁遗传性出血性疾病,由第八因子(FVIII)水平降低引起。大约 10-15% 的重度 HA(SHA)患者不会出现预期的出血模式。在此,我们使用旋转血栓弹力测定法(ROTEM)和活化部分凝血活酶时间-血栓波形分析法(APTT-CWA)评估了血友病 A 的表型严重程度:方法:招募确诊为 A 型血友病的患者。临床表型分配是根据已发表的文献进行的,患者被分为四个表型亚组。首先在 INTEM 模式下使用贫血小板血浆在 ROTEM 上检测全血样本,然后检测 APTT,并同时记录 APTT-CWA 图:本研究共招募了 66 名患者。使用 ROTEM 和 APTT-CWA 在四个表型分类组之间观察到了明显的统计学差异。将轻度/中度至重度表型患者(II 组)与无抑制剂的 SHA 患者(IV 组)进行比较,发现 ROTEM 或 APTT-CWA 的所有参数均无明显差异。使用 ROTEM 的 MCF、MA30、MAXV 和 Alpha 角值在使用抑制剂的 SHA 患者中最低,这有助于将他们与未使用抑制剂的 SHA 患者区分开来。然而,使用 APTT-CWA 参数却无法区分这两组患者:结论:ROTEM 可用于区分有抑制剂的 SHA 患者和无抑制剂的 SHA 患者,其参数组合具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。然而,APTT-CWA 并不能用于区分这两类患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of FVIII pharmacokinetic profiles in Korean hemophilia A patients assessed with myPKFiT: a retrospective chart review. Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance from the perspective of nephrologists. Clinical data on treatment regimen and use of medication among patients with hemophilia B in Korea. Functional iron deficiency anemia in patients with cancer. Proper application of anticoagulation therapy on cancer-associated venous thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1