MR Safety of Inductively Coupled and Conventional Intraoral Coils.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001091
Agazi Samuel Tesfai, Simon Reiss, Thomas Lottner, Michael Bock, Ali Caglar Özen
{"title":"MR Safety of Inductively Coupled and Conventional Intraoral Coils.","authors":"Agazi Samuel Tesfai, Simon Reiss, Thomas Lottner, Michael Bock, Ali Caglar Özen","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intraoral coils (IOCs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio compared with conventional extraoral coils. To assess the safety of IOCs, we propose a 2-step procedure to evaluate radiofrequency-induced heating of IOCs and compare maximum temperature increases in 3 different types of IOCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2-step safety assessment consists of electric field measurements and simulations to identify local hotspots followed by temperature measurements during MRI. With this method, 3 different coil types (inductively coupled IFC, transmit/receive tLoop, and receive-only tLoopRx) were tested at 1.5 T and 3 T for both tuned and detuned coil states. High SAR and regular MRI protocols were applied for 2 coil positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured E field maps display distinct hotspots for all tuned IOCs, which were reduced by at least 40-fold when the IOCs were detuned. Maximum temperature rise was higher when the coils were positioned at the periphery of the phantom with the coil planes parallel to B0. When neither active nor passive detuning was applied, maximum temperature increase of ΔT = 1.3/0.5/1.8 K was found for IFC/tLoop/tLoopRx coils. Hotspots detected by E field measurements, and simulations were consistent. In the simulations, the results were different for homogeneous phantoms compared with full anatomical models. The 2-step test procedure is applicable to different coil types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that a risk for radiofrequency-induced heating exists for tuned IOCs, so that adequate detuning circuits need to be integrated in the coils to ensure safe operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intraoral coils (IOCs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio compared with conventional extraoral coils. To assess the safety of IOCs, we propose a 2-step procedure to evaluate radiofrequency-induced heating of IOCs and compare maximum temperature increases in 3 different types of IOCs.

Methods: The 2-step safety assessment consists of electric field measurements and simulations to identify local hotspots followed by temperature measurements during MRI. With this method, 3 different coil types (inductively coupled IFC, transmit/receive tLoop, and receive-only tLoopRx) were tested at 1.5 T and 3 T for both tuned and detuned coil states. High SAR and regular MRI protocols were applied for 2 coil positions.

Results: The measured E field maps display distinct hotspots for all tuned IOCs, which were reduced by at least 40-fold when the IOCs were detuned. Maximum temperature rise was higher when the coils were positioned at the periphery of the phantom with the coil planes parallel to B0. When neither active nor passive detuning was applied, maximum temperature increase of ΔT = 1.3/0.5/1.8 K was found for IFC/tLoop/tLoopRx coils. Hotspots detected by E field measurements, and simulations were consistent. In the simulations, the results were different for homogeneous phantoms compared with full anatomical models. The 2-step test procedure is applicable to different coil types.

Conclusions: The results indicate that a risk for radiofrequency-induced heating exists for tuned IOCs, so that adequate detuning circuits need to be integrated in the coils to ensure safe operation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电感耦合口内线圈和传统口内线圈的磁共振安全性
目的:与传统的口外线圈相比,磁共振成像(MRI)中的口内线圈(IOC)能显著提高信噪比。为了评估 IOC 的安全性,我们提出了一个分两步的程序来评估 IOC 的射频诱导加热,并比较 3 种不同类型 IOC 的最大温升:两步安全评估包括电场测量和模拟,以确定局部热点,然后在磁共振成像过程中测量温度。利用这种方法,在 1.5 T 和 3 T 的调谐和失谐线圈状态下测试了 3 种不同的线圈类型(电感耦合 IFC、发射/接收 tLoop 和仅接收 tLoopRx)。对 2 个线圈位置采用了高 SAR 和常规 MRI 方案:测得的电场图显示,所有调谐 IOC 都有明显的热点,当 IOC 调谐时,热点至少减少了 40 倍。当线圈位于幻影外围、线圈平面平行于 B0 时,最大温升较高。在既没有主动也没有被动失谐的情况下,IFC/tLoop/tLoopRx 线圈的最大温升为ΔT = 1.3/0.5/1.8 K。电场测量检测到的热点与模拟结果一致。在模拟中,均质模型与全解剖模型的结果不同。两步测试程序适用于不同类型的线圈:结果表明,调谐 IOC 存在射频诱导加热的风险,因此需要在线圈中集成适当的解谐电路,以确保安全操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Hot Topics in Diagnostic Imaging-Encompassing Advances in MR, Photon-Counting CT, and Ultrasound. Implementation of an AI Algorithm in Clinical Practice to Reduce Missed Incidental Pulmonary Embolisms on Chest CT and Its Impact on Short-Term Survival. Tungsten-Based Contrast Agent for Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography in Calcified Coronaries: Comparison to Iodine in a Cardiovascular Phantom. Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study. Countering Calcium Blooming With Personalized Contrast Media Injection Protocols: The 1-2-3 Rule for Photon-Counting Detector CCTA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1