Outcomes of Nonpenetrating Versus Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Open Angle Glaucoma.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002421
Francesco Giorgio Merlo Pich, Leandro Oliverio, Kevin Gillmann, André Mermoud
{"title":"Outcomes of Nonpenetrating Versus Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Open Angle Glaucoma.","authors":"Francesco Giorgio Merlo Pich, Leandro Oliverio, Kevin Gillmann, André Mermoud","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In this retrospective study, nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) interventions showed similar >90% complete success rates at 1-year postsurgery. However, NPDS achieved a superior safety profile in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovery and rates of post-surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparing the surgical outcomes of 2 surgical techniques: NPDS and PDS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study including 66 eyes from 57 patients aged 69 ± 9 years who underwent either NPDS or PDS for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma. Outcome measurements included intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, rates of complications, postoperative corrective interventions, and glaucoma medications at baseline and at all postoperative appointments up to 1 year. An exploratory mixed-effect model was used to assess the intergroup differences between IOP and BCVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-year postsurgery, a similar significant IOP reduction from baseline was observed in NPDS (from 19.9 ± 1.3 to 11.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and PDS (from 19.5 ± 1.1 to 10.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, P < 0.001). A conservative complete success rate (defined as medicated IOP ≤16 mm Hg and ≥20% reduction in IOP) was 87% for NPDS and 97% for PDS. No BCVA changes were observed between baseline and 1-year postsurgery in both groups, and glaucoma medications showed a similar 10-fold reduction in both groups ( P < 0.001 vs baseline). However, a significant difference in the speed of postoperative BVCA recovery was observed between NPDS and PDS ( P < 0.01), with NPDS showing a faster recovery. Moreover, lower numbers of postsurgical complications and postoperative interventions were observed after NPDS compared with PDS [NPDS, n = 30 and 34 vs PDS, n = 80 and 48 ( P < 0.05), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study confirmed that both NPDS and PDS are highly effective surgical interventions for the management of primary open angle glaucoma. However, NPDS had a superior safety profile in terms of BCVA recovery, complication rates, and postoperative interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: In this retrospective study, nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and penetrating deep sclerectomy (PDS) interventions showed similar >90% complete success rates at 1-year postsurgery. However, NPDS achieved a superior safety profile in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recovery and rates of post-surgical complications.

Objective: Comparing the surgical outcomes of 2 surgical techniques: NPDS and PDS.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, comparative study including 66 eyes from 57 patients aged 69 ± 9 years who underwent either NPDS or PDS for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma. Outcome measurements included intraocular pressure (IOP), BCVA, rates of complications, postoperative corrective interventions, and glaucoma medications at baseline and at all postoperative appointments up to 1 year. An exploratory mixed-effect model was used to assess the intergroup differences between IOP and BCVA.

Results: One-year postsurgery, a similar significant IOP reduction from baseline was observed in NPDS (from 19.9 ± 1.3 to 11.5 ± 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.001) and PDS (from 19.5 ± 1.1 to 10.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, P < 0.001). A conservative complete success rate (defined as medicated IOP ≤16 mm Hg and ≥20% reduction in IOP) was 87% for NPDS and 97% for PDS. No BCVA changes were observed between baseline and 1-year postsurgery in both groups, and glaucoma medications showed a similar 10-fold reduction in both groups ( P < 0.001 vs baseline). However, a significant difference in the speed of postoperative BVCA recovery was observed between NPDS and PDS ( P < 0.01), with NPDS showing a faster recovery. Moreover, lower numbers of postsurgical complications and postoperative interventions were observed after NPDS compared with PDS [NPDS, n = 30 and 34 vs PDS, n = 80 and 48 ( P < 0.05), respectively].

Conclusions: The present study confirmed that both NPDS and PDS are highly effective surgical interventions for the management of primary open angle glaucoma. However, NPDS had a superior safety profile in terms of BCVA recovery, complication rates, and postoperative interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开角型青光眼非穿透性深巩膜切除术与穿透性深巩膜切除术的疗效对比。
摘要:在这项回顾性研究中,非穿透性深部巩膜切除术和穿透性深部巩膜切除术在术后一年的完全成功率>90%,表现相似。目的:比较两种手术技术的手术效果:非穿透性深层巩膜切除术(NPDS)和穿透性深层巩膜切除术(PDS):这是一项回顾性、纵向比较研究,包括57名年龄在69±9岁之间的患者的66只眼睛,他们都因药物无法控制的开角型青光眼而接受了NPDS或PDS手术。结果测量包括眼压(IOP)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、并发症发生率、术后矫正干预以及基线和术后一年内所有预约的青光眼药物。采用探索性混合效应模型评估 IOP 和 BCVA 的组间差异:结果:术后一年,NPDS 患者的眼压与基线值相比有类似的显著降低(从 19.9±1.3 mmHg 降至 11.5±0.9 mmHg,PC结论:本研究证实,NPDS 和 PDS 都是治疗原发性开角型青光眼的高效手术干预措施。然而,NPDS在BCVA恢复、并发症发生率和术后干预方面具有更高的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Migraine and Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Twelve-Year Nationwide Retrospective Korean Cohort Study. Comparison of Elisar-Fast and Sita-Fast Strategy for Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma. Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and Predictors of Success in Patients of African Ancestry with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Outcomes of a Second Ahmed Glaucoma Implant With Mitomycin-C in Pediatric Glaucoma After Initial Valve Failure. Outcomes of Phacoemulsification With or Without Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy for Glaucoma Patients With Cataract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1