Private practice dietetics: A scoping review of the literature.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12877
Jennifer Donnelly, Rebecca Lane, Louisa Walsh, Roger Hughes
{"title":"Private practice dietetics: A scoping review of the literature.","authors":"Jennifer Donnelly, Rebecca Lane, Louisa Walsh, Roger Hughes","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Private practice is one of the most rapidly growing, but under-researched employment sectors for graduate dietitians in Australia, limiting evidence-based workforce development. This scoping review examines existing international literature to gain an understanding of the current private practice workforce size, distribution, demography and workforce development considerations, including competencies, supply and demand, remuneration and professional development activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EMCARE, PsycInfo (Ovid) and grey literature were systematically searched in August 2023 using key search terms to identify studies for inclusion. Articles were included if they related to private practice dietetics and described an aspect of workforce. Original research, government and organisational reports, statements of practice and websites providing governmental or organisational statistics were included. A directed content analysis and qualitative constant comparison technique were used to deductively map intelligence sources against a workforce development framework. A gap analysis was also conducted to provide a focus for future workforce development research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were included, with 65% of the studies being Australian-based publications. Private practice dietetics research interest has increased in the last decade. Despite a breadth of published sources, this review found little published data on workforce size, distribution, demography, supply, demand, continued professional development and remuneration, indicating a significant gap in the evidence base. Existing literature focuses on workforce challenges and barriers, the work of private practice dietitians, with limited exploration of competency requirements for graduate private practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The literature on the private practice dietetics workforce is lacking worldwide, which constrains evidenced-based workforce development initiatives. Workforce development research across all workforce aspects is warranted to address current evidence gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Private practice is one of the most rapidly growing, but under-researched employment sectors for graduate dietitians in Australia, limiting evidence-based workforce development. This scoping review examines existing international literature to gain an understanding of the current private practice workforce size, distribution, demography and workforce development considerations, including competencies, supply and demand, remuneration and professional development activities.

Methods: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EMCARE, PsycInfo (Ovid) and grey literature were systematically searched in August 2023 using key search terms to identify studies for inclusion. Articles were included if they related to private practice dietetics and described an aspect of workforce. Original research, government and organisational reports, statements of practice and websites providing governmental or organisational statistics were included. A directed content analysis and qualitative constant comparison technique were used to deductively map intelligence sources against a workforce development framework. A gap analysis was also conducted to provide a focus for future workforce development research.

Results: A total of 72 peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were included, with 65% of the studies being Australian-based publications. Private practice dietetics research interest has increased in the last decade. Despite a breadth of published sources, this review found little published data on workforce size, distribution, demography, supply, demand, continued professional development and remuneration, indicating a significant gap in the evidence base. Existing literature focuses on workforce challenges and barriers, the work of private practice dietitians, with limited exploration of competency requirements for graduate private practitioners.

Conclusions: The literature on the private practice dietetics workforce is lacking worldwide, which constrains evidenced-based workforce development initiatives. Workforce development research across all workforce aspects is warranted to address current evidence gaps.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人执业营养学:文献综述。
目的:在澳大利亚,私人执业是发展最迅速但研究不足的毕业营养师就业领域之一,这限制了以证据为基础的劳动力发展。本范围综述研究了现有的国际文献,以了解当前私人执业营养师队伍的规模、分布、人口构成和队伍发展考虑因素,包括能力、供需、薪酬和职业发展活动:2023 年 8 月,使用关键检索词对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、EMCARE、PsycInfo (Ovid) 和灰色文献等数据库进行了系统检索,以确定纳入的研究。如果文章与私人执业营养学有关并描述了劳动力的某个方面,则会被纳入。原始研究、政府和组织报告、实践声明以及提供政府或组织统计数据的网站均被收录。采用定向内容分析和定性恒定比较技术,根据劳动力发展框架对情报来源进行演绎映射。此外,还进行了差距分析,以便为今后的劳动力发展研究提供重点:结果:共收录了 72 篇经同行评审的文献和灰色文献,其中 65% 的研究是在澳大利亚发表的。在过去十年中,人们对私人执业营养学的研究兴趣与日俱增。尽管出版的资料来源广泛,但本综述发现有关劳动力规模、分布、人口、供应、需求、持续职业发展和薪酬的出版数据很少,这表明在证据基础方面存在很大差距。现有文献主要关注劳动力的挑战和障碍、私人执业营养师的工作,对私人执业营养师毕业生能力要求的探讨有限:世界范围内缺乏有关私人执业营养师队伍的文献,这限制了以证据为基础的劳动力发展计划。为解决目前的证据缺口,有必要对所有劳动力方面的劳动力发展进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
How do plant-based milks compare to cow's milk nutritionally? An audit of the plant-based milk products available in Australia. Food intake in an Australian Aboriginal rural community facing food and water security challenges: A cross-sectional survey. The test-retest reliability and validity of food photography and food diary analyses. What have equity and human rights got to do with dietetics? Foodservice strategies for reducing athlete illness at the Olympic and Paralympic Games.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1