Same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary procedures-Structured review and comprehensive meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02347-z
Mathias C Brandt, Hannes Alber, Rudolf Berger, Ronald K Binder, Julia Mascherbauer, Alexander Niessner, Martin Schmid, Bernhard Wernly, Matthias Frick
{"title":"Same-day discharge after percutaneous coronary procedures-Structured review and comprehensive meta-analysis.","authors":"Mathias C Brandt, Hannes Alber, Rudolf Berger, Ronald K Binder, Julia Mascherbauer, Alexander Niessner, Martin Schmid, Bernhard Wernly, Matthias Frick","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02347-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The safety and feasibility of performing these procedures on a same-day discharge basis for selected patients has been studied in a large number of mostly nonrandomized trials. An up to date literature review should focus on trials with radial access, representing the current standard for coronary procedures in Austria and other European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this consensus statement is to review the most recent evidence for the safety and feasibility of performing same-day discharge procedures in selected patients. A structured literature search was performed using prespecified search criteria, focusing on trials with radial access procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 clinical trials and 4 large meta-analyses were retrieved, spanning 21 years of clinical evidence from 2001 to 2022. The outcome data from a wide range of clinical settings were unanimous in showing no negative effect on early (24 h) or late (30 day) major adverse events after same-day discharge coronary procedures. Based on nine prospective trials a comprehensive meta-analysis was compiled. Using 1‑month major adverse events data the pooled odds ratio of same-day discharge versus overnight stay procedures was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.35-01.24; p = 0.19; I<sup>2</sup> 0%), indicating a noninferiority in carefully selected patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcome data from same-day discharge coronary intervention trials with radial access confirm the robust safety profile showing no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to overnight stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02347-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The safety and feasibility of performing these procedures on a same-day discharge basis for selected patients has been studied in a large number of mostly nonrandomized trials. An up to date literature review should focus on trials with radial access, representing the current standard for coronary procedures in Austria and other European countries.

Methods: The aim of this consensus statement is to review the most recent evidence for the safety and feasibility of performing same-day discharge procedures in selected patients. A structured literature search was performed using prespecified search criteria, focusing on trials with radial access procedures.

Results: A total of 44 clinical trials and 4 large meta-analyses were retrieved, spanning 21 years of clinical evidence from 2001 to 2022. The outcome data from a wide range of clinical settings were unanimous in showing no negative effect on early (24 h) or late (30 day) major adverse events after same-day discharge coronary procedures. Based on nine prospective trials a comprehensive meta-analysis was compiled. Using 1‑month major adverse events data the pooled odds ratio of same-day discharge versus overnight stay procedures was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.35-01.24; p = 0.19; I2 0%), indicating a noninferiority in carefully selected patients.

Conclusion: Outcome data from same-day discharge coronary intervention trials with radial access confirm the robust safety profile showing no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to overnight stay.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉手术后当天出院--结构化回顾和综合荟萃分析。
介绍:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是冠状动脉疾病患者行之有效的血管重建策略。大量非随机试验研究了为特定患者在当天出院的基础上实施这些手术的安全性和可行性。最新的文献综述应侧重于桡动脉入路的试验,这代表了奥地利和其他欧洲国家冠状动脉手术的现行标准:本共识声明的目的是回顾有关对特定患者进行当天出院手术的安全性和可行性的最新证据。我们采用预先设定的检索标准进行了结构化文献检索,重点是有关径向入路手术的试验:结果:共检索到 44 项临床试验和 4 项大型荟萃分析,涵盖了从 2001 年到 2022 年 21 年的临床证据。来自各种临床环境的结果数据一致显示,当天出院的冠状动脉手术对早期(24 小时)或晚期(30 天)主要不良事件没有负面影响。在九项前瞻性试验的基础上,进行了一项全面的荟萃分析。根据1个月的主要不良事件数据,当日出院手术与过夜留院手术的汇总几率比为0.66(95%置信区间,CI 0.35-01.24;P = 0.19;I2 0%),这表明在经过仔细筛选的患者中,当日出院手术不具有劣势:桡动脉入路当天出院冠状动脉介入试验的结果数据证实了其稳健的安全性,与住院一晚相比,重大不良事件的风险没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
期刊最新文献
Gastrointestinal function and pain outcomes following segmental resection or discoid resection for low rectal endometriosis. Olfaction and thyroid hormones in patients with subjective cognitive decline, non-amnestic and amnestic mild cognitive impairment Neurofibromatosis type 1 adult surveillance form for Austria COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis and anxiety Deciphering the role of lactate as a prognostic indicator in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1