Percutaneous gastrostomy, mechanical ventilation and survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an observational study in an incident cohort.

Giuseppe Borghero, Vincenzo Pierri, Francesca Pili, Antonella Muroni, Tommaso Ercoli, Maria Ida Pateri, Silvy Pilotto, Alessandra Maccabeo, Adriano Chiò, Giovanni Defazio
{"title":"Percutaneous gastrostomy, mechanical ventilation and survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an observational study in an incident cohort.","authors":"Giuseppe Borghero, Vincenzo Pierri, Francesca Pili, Antonella Muroni, Tommaso Ercoli, Maria Ida Pateri, Silvy Pilotto, Alessandra Maccabeo, Adriano Chiò, Giovanni Defazio","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2024.2351185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze disease-modifying effects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion for supporting nutrition, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and tracheostomy-assisted ('invasive') ventilation (TIV) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed survival in a large population-based incident cohort that was prospectively followed up in our center. Analysis considered several known ALS-related prognostic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this population, PEG and NIV in multivariable analysis significantly correlated to survival as computed by disease onset to death/tracheostomy. NIV was associated with better survival while PEG was associated with reduced survival. Other independent prognostic factors were age at ALS onset, diagnostic delay, and flail arm/leg and pure upper motor neuron (PUMN) phenotypes. The length of survival after TIV was significantly associated with age at ALS onset (inverse correlation) whereas other variables did not. The length of survival after TIV correlated to age at ALS onset in such a way that each additional year of age at ALS onset decreased survival by about 0.7 months. Patients who underwent both TIV and NIV did not experience a better survival than those who underwent TIV alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of effect of enteral nutrition on ALS survival probably reflected the timing of PEG insertion in patients with more severe disease. By contrast, patients who used mechanical ventilation had an increased overall survival compared with non-ventilated ones. The study also provided new information showing that the combined use of NIV and TIV did not may prolong ALS survival as compared to TIV alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2024.2351185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze disease-modifying effects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion for supporting nutrition, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and tracheostomy-assisted ('invasive') ventilation (TIV) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed survival in a large population-based incident cohort that was prospectively followed up in our center. Analysis considered several known ALS-related prognostic variables.

Results: In this population, PEG and NIV in multivariable analysis significantly correlated to survival as computed by disease onset to death/tracheostomy. NIV was associated with better survival while PEG was associated with reduced survival. Other independent prognostic factors were age at ALS onset, diagnostic delay, and flail arm/leg and pure upper motor neuron (PUMN) phenotypes. The length of survival after TIV was significantly associated with age at ALS onset (inverse correlation) whereas other variables did not. The length of survival after TIV correlated to age at ALS onset in such a way that each additional year of age at ALS onset decreased survival by about 0.7 months. Patients who underwent both TIV and NIV did not experience a better survival than those who underwent TIV alone.

Conclusion: The lack of effect of enteral nutrition on ALS survival probably reflected the timing of PEG insertion in patients with more severe disease. By contrast, patients who used mechanical ventilation had an increased overall survival compared with non-ventilated ones. The study also provided new information showing that the combined use of NIV and TIV did not may prolong ALS survival as compared to TIV alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮胃造口术、机械通气与肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者的存活率:一项事故队列观察研究。
目的分析经皮内镜胃造瘘术(PEG)对肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者进行营养支持、无创通气(NIV)和气管造口辅助("有创")通气(TIV)的疾病调节作用:我们回顾性分析了在本中心进行前瞻性随访的大型人群发病队列的存活率。分析考虑了几个已知的 ALS 相关预后变量:结果:在这一人群中,PEG 和 NIV 在多变量分析中与从发病到死亡/气管造口术的存活率显著相关。NIV 与较高的存活率相关,而 PEG 与较低的存活率相关。其他独立的预后因素包括 ALS 发病年龄、诊断延迟、手臂/腿部外翻和纯上运动神经元 (PUMN) 表型。TIV 后的存活时间与 ALS 发病年龄显著相关(呈反相关),而其他变量则不相关。TIV后的存活时间与ALS发病年龄相关,ALS发病年龄每增加一岁,存活时间就会减少约0.7个月。同时接受TIV和NIV治疗的患者的存活率并不比仅接受TIV治疗的患者高:结论:肠内营养对 ALS 存活率没有影响,这可能反映了在病情较严重的患者中插入 PEG 的时机。相比之下,使用机械通气的患者比不使用机械通气的患者总生存率更高。该研究还提供了新的信息,表明与单独使用 TIV 相比,联合使用 NIV 和 TIV 并不能延长 ALS 的存活时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALSUntangled #76: Wahls protocol. Graph theory network analysis reveals widespread white matter damage in brains of patients with classic ALS. Alteration in ornithine metabolism due to mutation in ALDH18A1 masquerading as ALS in pregnancy. Multistep modeling applied to a Malaysian ALS registry. Assessing disease progression in ALS: prognostic subgroups and outliers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1