ARE THERE ADVANTAGES IN DOUBLE TRANSIT RECONSTRUCTION AFTER TOTAL GASTRECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Luigi Carlo da Silva Costa, Ary Augusto de Castro Macedo, Juliana Mattei de Araújo, Ewerton Lima da Silva, Luís Felipe Gomes Reis de Moraes, Aline Dos Santos, Hugo Gomes Soares, Valdir Tercioti Junior, João de Souza Coelho Neto, Nelson Adami Andreollo, Luiz Roberto Lopes
{"title":"ARE THERE ADVANTAGES IN DOUBLE TRANSIT RECONSTRUCTION AFTER TOTAL GASTRECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.","authors":"Luigi Carlo da Silva Costa, Ary Augusto de Castro Macedo, Juliana Mattei de Araújo, Ewerton Lima da Silva, Luís Felipe Gomes Reis de Moraes, Aline Dos Santos, Hugo Gomes Soares, Valdir Tercioti Junior, João de Souza Coelho Neto, Nelson Adami Andreollo, Luiz Roberto Lopes","doi":"10.1590/0102-672020240006e1799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Curative treatment for gastric cancer involves tumor resection, followed by transit reconstruction, with Roux-en-Y being the main technique employed. To permit food transit to the duodenum, which is absent in Roux-en-Y, double transit reconstruction has been used, whose theoretical advantages seem to surpass the previous technique.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the clinical evolution of gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y and double tract reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was carried out on Web of Science, Scopus, EmbasE, SciELO, Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. Data were collected until June 11, 2022. Observational studies or clinical trials evaluating patients submitted to double tract (DT) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstructions were included. There was no temporal or language restriction. Review articles, case reports, case series, and incomplete texts were excluded. The risk of bias was calculated using the Cochrane tool designed for randomized clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies of good methodological quality were included, encompassing 209 participants. In the RY group, there was a greater reduction in food intake. In the DT group, the decrease in body mass index was less pronounced compared to preoperative values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double tract reconstruction had better outcomes concerning body mass index and the time until starting a light diet; however, it did not present any advantages in relation to nutritional deficits, quality of life, and post-surgical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72298,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","volume":"37 ","pages":"e1799"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020240006e1799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Curative treatment for gastric cancer involves tumor resection, followed by transit reconstruction, with Roux-en-Y being the main technique employed. To permit food transit to the duodenum, which is absent in Roux-en-Y, double transit reconstruction has been used, whose theoretical advantages seem to surpass the previous technique.

Aims: To compare the clinical evolution of gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y and double tract reconstruction.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out on Web of Science, Scopus, EmbasE, SciELO, Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. Data were collected until June 11, 2022. Observational studies or clinical trials evaluating patients submitted to double tract (DT) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstructions were included. There was no temporal or language restriction. Review articles, case reports, case series, and incomplete texts were excluded. The risk of bias was calculated using the Cochrane tool designed for randomized clinical trials.

Results: Four studies of good methodological quality were included, encompassing 209 participants. In the RY group, there was a greater reduction in food intake. In the DT group, the decrease in body mass index was less pronounced compared to preoperative values.

Conclusions: The double tract reconstruction had better outcomes concerning body mass index and the time until starting a light diet; however, it did not present any advantages in relation to nutritional deficits, quality of life, and post-surgical complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃癌患者全胃切除术后双转流重建有优势吗?系统综述。
背景:胃癌的根治性治疗包括肿瘤切除,然后进行转运重建,Roux-en-Y是主要采用的技术。目的:比较接受 Roux-en-Y 和双通道重建全胃切除术的胃癌患者的临床演变情况:方法:在 Web of Science、Scopus、EmbasE、SciELO、Virtual Health Library、PubMed、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar 数据库中进行了系统回顾。数据收集至 2022 年 6 月 11 日。研究对象包括对接受双道(DT)和Roux-en-Y(RY)重建术的患者进行评估的观察性研究或临床试验。没有时间或语言限制。综述文章、病例报告、病例系列和不完整的文本均被排除在外。使用为随机临床试验设计的 Cochrane 工具计算偏倚风险:结果:共纳入了四项方法质量良好的研究,共有 209 名参与者。在 RY 组中,食物摄入量的减少幅度更大。DT组的体重指数与术前值相比下降不明显:结论:在体重指数和开始清淡饮食的时间方面,双道重建效果更好;但在营养障碍、生活质量和术后并发症方面,双道重建没有任何优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHROMOPHOBE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGES. COMPLICATIONS AFTER HEPATECTOMY. EARLY REFEEDING AFTER COLORECTAL CANCER SURGERY REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY. MANAGEMENT OF SYNCHRONIC LARGE LIVER METASTASIS IN A NON-OCCLUSIVE COLON TUMOR. HETEROTOPIC GASTRIC MUCOSA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AS A POTENTIAL CAUSE OF PEPTIC STENOSIS AFTER ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1