Stone centers: a national survey on surgical techniques performed in Italy.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05778-1
Stefano DI Bari, Giuseppe Stella, Mattia Benedetti, Michele Talso, Alberto Saita, Carlo Zaraca, Riccardo Ferrari, Pietro Acquati, Riccardo Lombardo, Stefania Ferretti, Stefano Puliatti, Luigi Cormio, Salvatore Micali
{"title":"Stone centers: a national survey on surgical techniques performed in Italy.","authors":"Stefano DI Bari, Giuseppe Stella, Mattia Benedetti, Michele Talso, Alberto Saita, Carlo Zaraca, Riccardo Ferrari, Pietro Acquati, Riccardo Lombardo, Stefania Ferretti, Stefano Puliatti, Luigi Cormio, Salvatore Micali","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05778-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent and complex stone disease may be considered a challenging disease. In 2018, the Calculus group of the SIU (Italian Society of Urology) set itself the goal of establishing the minimum requirements for a center that could continuously manage urolithiasis pathology, named a Stone Center. In this study we present the results of a pilot survey carried out in 2019 with the aim of drawing a map of the situation of Italian urological centers dealing with urinary stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 260 national urology departments dealing with urolithiasis surgery were contacted for this study. A survey was issued to each of the centers to determine the number of patients treated for urinary stones and the amount of procedures performed per year: 1) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ESWL; 2) ureterorenoscopy URS; 3) retrograde intrarenal surgery RIRS; 4) percutaneous nephrolithotomy PCNL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 260 centers contacted, 188 fulfilled the survey. Outcomes were quite variable, with approximately 37% of the centers lacking a lithotripter, and 46% of those that did have it performing fewer than 100 treatments per year. In terms of endoscopic procedures, more than 80% of the centers contacted performed URS or RIRS; however, when it came to percutaneous lithotripsy, these numbers dropped significantly; 33% of the centers contacted did not perform PCNL, and of those who did, 18% had less than 5 years of experience as a center.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey shows a very heterogeneous national picture about urolithiasis treatments. Our goal is to create national paradigms to be able to define stone centers where the patient suffering from complex urinary stones can find a network of professionals with an adequate armamentarium suitable for the management of their pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05778-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent and complex stone disease may be considered a challenging disease. In 2018, the Calculus group of the SIU (Italian Society of Urology) set itself the goal of establishing the minimum requirements for a center that could continuously manage urolithiasis pathology, named a Stone Center. In this study we present the results of a pilot survey carried out in 2019 with the aim of drawing a map of the situation of Italian urological centers dealing with urinary stones.

Methods: A total of 260 national urology departments dealing with urolithiasis surgery were contacted for this study. A survey was issued to each of the centers to determine the number of patients treated for urinary stones and the amount of procedures performed per year: 1) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ESWL; 2) ureterorenoscopy URS; 3) retrograde intrarenal surgery RIRS; 4) percutaneous nephrolithotomy PCNL.

Results: Out of 260 centers contacted, 188 fulfilled the survey. Outcomes were quite variable, with approximately 37% of the centers lacking a lithotripter, and 46% of those that did have it performing fewer than 100 treatments per year. In terms of endoscopic procedures, more than 80% of the centers contacted performed URS or RIRS; however, when it came to percutaneous lithotripsy, these numbers dropped significantly; 33% of the centers contacted did not perform PCNL, and of those who did, 18% had less than 5 years of experience as a center.

Conclusions: Our survey shows a very heterogeneous national picture about urolithiasis treatments. Our goal is to create national paradigms to be able to define stone centers where the patient suffering from complex urinary stones can find a network of professionals with an adequate armamentarium suitable for the management of their pathology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结石中心:意大利全国手术技术调查。
背景:复发性复杂结石病可被视为一种具有挑战性的疾病。2018 年,SIU(意大利泌尿外科学会)结石小组为自己设定了一个目标,即建立一个能够持续管理泌尿系结石病理的中心(名为结石中心)的最低要求。在本研究中,我们介绍了2019年开展的一项试点调查的结果,目的是绘制意大利泌尿外科中心处理尿路结石情况的地图:本研究共联系了260个国家的泌尿外科部门,这些部门负责处理泌尿系结石手术。向每个中心发放了一份调查表,以确定每年接受尿路结石治疗的患者人数和手术数量:1) 体外冲击波碎石 ESWL;2) 输尿管镜 URS;3) 逆行肾内手术 RIRS;4) 经皮肾镜 PCNL:在所联系的 260 个中心中,有 188 个完成了调查。结果差异很大,约 37% 的中心没有碎石机,46% 有碎石机的中心每年进行的治疗少于 100 次。在内窥镜手术方面,超过80%的受访中心开展了URS或RIRS手术;但在经皮碎石方面,这些数字大幅下降;33%的受访中心未开展PCNL手术,而在开展PCNL手术的中心中,18%的中心开展该手术的时间不足5年:结论:我们的调查显示,全国尿路结石的治疗方法各不相同。我们的目标是建立全国性的范例,以确定结石中心,让复杂性泌尿系统结石患者能够找到一个由专业人员组成的网络,并拥有适合其病理治疗的适当武器装备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
期刊最新文献
Augmentation cystoplasty in children with neuropathic bladder: long-term outcomes after 30 years experience. Intraoperative complications during radical cystectomy: a detailed analysis of intraoperative vascular injuries. Validation of lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph-node invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm System) in patients with large prostates: results from a prospective comparative study. Early prostatic artery control (EPAC) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new surgical technique aiming to improve early potency recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1