The safety and efficacy of Sotn ureteroscopy for renal and upper ureteral calculi: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Minerva Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05595-2
Zhenlang Guo, Zhichao Wang, Xiangtao Weng, Yanquan Tang, Deneng Wu, Fan Cheng, Bin Chen, Huilong Tang, Jinsheng Cui, Chiming Gu, Qianming Zou, Yuan Li, Shu Gan, Songtao Xiang, Shusheng Wang
{"title":"The safety and efficacy of Sotn ureteroscopy for renal and upper ureteral calculi: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Zhenlang Guo, Zhichao Wang, Xiangtao Weng, Yanquan Tang, Deneng Wu, Fan Cheng, Bin Chen, Huilong Tang, Jinsheng Cui, Chiming Gu, Qianming Zou, Yuan Li, Shu Gan, Songtao Xiang, Shusheng Wang","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05595-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sotn ureteroscopy is a new lithotripsy procedure developed on the basis of ureteroscopy and includes a rigid ureteral access sheath, standard mirror, lithotripsy mirror, and Sotn perfusion aspirator. Thus, we performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Sotn ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral calculi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 224 patients with renal and upper ureteral calculi were randomly divided equally into study and control groups from March 2018 to March 2022. All the patients were approved by the hospital ethics committee (proof number: ZF-2018-164-01 and ZF-2018-165-01) of the Second Affiliate Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine in China. The primary outcome was stone-free rate (SFR) assessed by computed tomography on the 1<sup>st</sup> day and month after treatment and operation duration. The secondary outcome was postoperative complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, for upper ureteral calculi, the SFR of 1 day after operation of the Sotn ureteroscopy group was significantly higher than the rigid ureteroscopy group (83.6% vs. 60%, P=0.006). Moreover, operative time (33.7±1.80 vs. 52.9±2.73 min, P<0.005) of the Sotn ureteroscopy group was significantly lower than the rigid ureteroscopy group. Additionally, the SFR of 1 day after operation and operative time for the study group (Sotn ureteroscopy combined with flexible ureteroscopy) and the control group (flexible ureteroscopy alone) were 63.2% and 36.8% (P=0.005), 65.6±4.06 and 80.3±4.91 (P=0.023), respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the SFR of 1 month after operation, success rate of ureteral access sheath placement, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). In subgroups with stone diameters ≥1.5 cm and stone CT values ≥1000 Hounsfield units, Sotn ureteroscopy showed more advantages in terms of the SFR of 1 day after operation. Importantly, complications such as ureteral injury, sepsis, fever, and severe hematuria were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For renal and upper ureteral calculi, Sotn ureteroscopy has the advantage of a higher SFR of 1 day after the operation and a shorter operative time, suggesting that the Sotn ureteroscopy may have further potential applications in clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05595-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sotn ureteroscopy is a new lithotripsy procedure developed on the basis of ureteroscopy and includes a rigid ureteral access sheath, standard mirror, lithotripsy mirror, and Sotn perfusion aspirator. Thus, we performed a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Sotn ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral calculi.

Methods: In this study, 224 patients with renal and upper ureteral calculi were randomly divided equally into study and control groups from March 2018 to March 2022. All the patients were approved by the hospital ethics committee (proof number: ZF-2018-164-01 and ZF-2018-165-01) of the Second Affiliate Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine in China. The primary outcome was stone-free rate (SFR) assessed by computed tomography on the 1st day and month after treatment and operation duration. The secondary outcome was postoperative complication rate.

Results: In total, for upper ureteral calculi, the SFR of 1 day after operation of the Sotn ureteroscopy group was significantly higher than the rigid ureteroscopy group (83.6% vs. 60%, P=0.006). Moreover, operative time (33.7±1.80 vs. 52.9±2.73 min, P<0.005) of the Sotn ureteroscopy group was significantly lower than the rigid ureteroscopy group. Additionally, the SFR of 1 day after operation and operative time for the study group (Sotn ureteroscopy combined with flexible ureteroscopy) and the control group (flexible ureteroscopy alone) were 63.2% and 36.8% (P=0.005), 65.6±4.06 and 80.3±4.91 (P=0.023), respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the SFR of 1 month after operation, success rate of ureteral access sheath placement, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). In subgroups with stone diameters ≥1.5 cm and stone CT values ≥1000 Hounsfield units, Sotn ureteroscopy showed more advantages in terms of the SFR of 1 day after operation. Importantly, complications such as ureteral injury, sepsis, fever, and severe hematuria were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions: For renal and upper ureteral calculi, Sotn ureteroscopy has the advantage of a higher SFR of 1 day after the operation and a shorter operative time, suggesting that the Sotn ureteroscopy may have further potential applications in clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sotn输尿管镜检查治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
背景:Sotn输尿管镜检查是在输尿管镜检查基础上发展起来的一种新型碎石术,包括硬质输尿管入路鞘、标准镜、碎石镜和Sotn灌注吸引器。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验,比较 Sotn 输尿管镜治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石的安全性和有效性:在这项研究中,从2018年3月至2022年3月,将224例肾结石和输尿管上段结石患者随机平均分为研究组和对照组。所有患者均经中国广州中医药大学第二附属医院医院伦理委员会批准(证明编号:ZF-2018-164-01、ZF-2018-165-01)。主要研究结果为治疗后第1天和第1个月通过计算机断层扫描评估的无结石率(SFR)以及手术持续时间。次要结果为术后并发症发生率:总之,对于输尿管上段结石,索氏输尿管镜组术后 1 天的无结石率(SFR)明显高于硬性输尿管镜组(83.6% 对 60%,P=0.006)。此外,手术时间(33.7±1.80 vs. 52.9±2.73分钟,P0.05)。在结石直径≥1.5 cm、结石 CT 值≥1000 Hounsfield 单位的亚组中,Sotn 输尿管镜在术后 1 天的 SFR 方面显示出更大的优势。重要的是,输尿管损伤、败血症、发热和严重血尿等并发症在两组间无统计学差异(P>0.05):结论:对于肾结石和输尿管上段结石,Sotn输尿管镜具有术后1天SFR较高和手术时间较短的优势,这表明Sotn输尿管镜可能在临床上有进一步应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
期刊最新文献
Augmentation cystoplasty in children with neuropathic bladder: long-term outcomes after 30 years experience. Intraoperative complications during radical cystectomy: a detailed analysis of intraoperative vascular injuries. Validation of lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph-node invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm System) in patients with large prostates: results from a prospective comparative study. Early prostatic artery control (EPAC) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new surgical technique aiming to improve early potency recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1