The use of proxy measurement of internal states in people with intellectual disability: A scoping review

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/jar.13241
Kristen Webb, Monica Cuskelly, Ceridwen Owen
{"title":"The use of proxy measurement of internal states in people with intellectual disability: A scoping review","authors":"Kristen Webb,&nbsp;Monica Cuskelly,&nbsp;Ceridwen Owen","doi":"10.1111/jar.13241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The measurement of internal states of people with an intellectual disability is challenging. Given these difficulties, proxy respondents are sometimes used. However, the literature provides some caution about the validity of the use of proxy respondents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This review aims to identify the available evidence regarding the use of proxy respondents in the measurement of internal states of people with intellectual disabilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework was used for this review, refined with the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicate there are some differences in the findings reported with respect to the efficacy of the use of proxy respondents. These may be due to a number of inconsistencies and weaknesses in examinations of their utility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>If proxy-reports are to be useful in understanding the internal states of people with intellectual disability, researchers need to address the shortcomings revealed by this review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13241","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The measurement of internal states of people with an intellectual disability is challenging. Given these difficulties, proxy respondents are sometimes used. However, the literature provides some caution about the validity of the use of proxy respondents.

Aims

This review aims to identify the available evidence regarding the use of proxy respondents in the measurement of internal states of people with intellectual disabilities.

Method

The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework was used for this review, refined with the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology.

Results

Results indicate there are some differences in the findings reported with respect to the efficacy of the use of proxy respondents. These may be due to a number of inconsistencies and weaknesses in examinations of their utility.

Conclusions

If proxy-reports are to be useful in understanding the internal states of people with intellectual disability, researchers need to address the shortcomings revealed by this review.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障人士内心状态替代测量法的使用:范围综述。
背景:测量智障人士的内心状态具有挑战性。鉴于这些困难,有时会使用代理受访者。目的:本综述旨在确定有关在测量智障人士内心状态时使用代理受访者的现有证据:本综述采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的范围综述框架,并根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所的方法进行了改进:结果表明,在使用代理受访者的有效性方面,报告的结果存在一些差异。这可能是由于对其效用的研究存在一些不一致和不足之处:如果要使代理报告有助于了解智障人士的内心状态,研究人员就需要解决本综述所揭示的不足之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
期刊最新文献
Programme Recipient and Facilitator Experiences of Positive Family Connections for Families of Children With Intellectual Disabilities and/or Who Are Autistic External Factors Influencing the Motivation and Performance of Staff in Their Nutritional Work With Adults With Intellectual Disabilities Adapting a Self-Concept Questionnaire for Students With Intellectual Disabilities: An Inclusive Research Approach Teaching Early Reading Skills to Adults With Intellectual Disabilities Using a Support Worker/Family Carer Mediated Online Reading Programme: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial Language and Ageing in Adults With Down Syndrome: An Analysis of Receptive and Expressive Language Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1