Reverse remodeling of mitral leaflets after medical treatment in recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy.

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.5603/cj.95415
Yu Kang, Nan Wang, Keyi Liu, Zixuan Yang, Nan Qu, Xueke Zhong, Xiaojing Chen, Mian Wang, Qing Zhang
{"title":"Reverse remodeling of mitral leaflets after medical treatment in recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Yu Kang, Nan Wang, Keyi Liu, Zixuan Yang, Nan Qu, Xueke Zhong, Xiaojing Chen, Mian Wang, Qing Zhang","doi":"10.5603/cj.95415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growth of mitral leaflets (MLs) adaptive to left ventricluar (LV) remodeling has been observed. However, the elasticity of MLs upon mechanical stimuli would be supposed if it shrinks with LV reverse remodeling (LVRR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with idiopathic recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy (RODCM) (n = 82) and 50 matched normal controls (NC) were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 6 months of follow-up for the anterior and posterior mitral leaflet (AML and PML) length, mitral annular dimension (MAD), and tenting height (TH). LVRR was measured as a ≥ 15% reduction in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months, LVRR was achieved in 69.5% of patients. The AML (28 ± 3 vs. 26 ± 3 mm, p = 0.004) and PML (19 ± 4 vs. 17 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001) decreased in length, as well as the MAD (31 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 5 mm, p = 0.001) and TH (10 ± 3 vs. 8 ± 2 mm, p < 0.001). Compared with the NC group, the AML and PML of the RODCM group were 16.7% and 35.7% longer at baseline and remained 8.3% and 21.2% longer at follow-up, respectively. The change in AML or PML correlated moderately with that in LVEDV (r = 0.487, p < 0.001; r = 0.516, p < 0.001, respectively). The AML and PML length decreased in the LVRR (+) subgroup (AML, 28 ± 3 vs. 26 ± 3 mm, p = 0.001; PML, 20 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001), but remained the same in the LVRR (-) subgroup (27 ± 4 vs. 28 ± 4 mm, p = 0.318; 17 ± 3 vs. 17 ± 3 mm, p = 0.790).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enlarged MLs could reverse accompanied by LV reverse remodeling. This study provided the other facet of ML plasticity adaptive to mechanical stretching.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.95415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growth of mitral leaflets (MLs) adaptive to left ventricluar (LV) remodeling has been observed. However, the elasticity of MLs upon mechanical stimuli would be supposed if it shrinks with LV reverse remodeling (LVRR).

Material and methods: Patients with idiopathic recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy (RODCM) (n = 82) and 50 matched normal controls (NC) were prospectively enrolled. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 6 months of follow-up for the anterior and posterior mitral leaflet (AML and PML) length, mitral annular dimension (MAD), and tenting height (TH). LVRR was measured as a ≥ 15% reduction in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).

Results: After 6 months, LVRR was achieved in 69.5% of patients. The AML (28 ± 3 vs. 26 ± 3 mm, p = 0.004) and PML (19 ± 4 vs. 17 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001) decreased in length, as well as the MAD (31 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 5 mm, p = 0.001) and TH (10 ± 3 vs. 8 ± 2 mm, p < 0.001). Compared with the NC group, the AML and PML of the RODCM group were 16.7% and 35.7% longer at baseline and remained 8.3% and 21.2% longer at follow-up, respectively. The change in AML or PML correlated moderately with that in LVEDV (r = 0.487, p < 0.001; r = 0.516, p < 0.001, respectively). The AML and PML length decreased in the LVRR (+) subgroup (AML, 28 ± 3 vs. 26 ± 3 mm, p = 0.001; PML, 20 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 3 mm, p < 0.001), but remained the same in the LVRR (-) subgroup (27 ± 4 vs. 28 ± 4 mm, p = 0.318; 17 ± 3 vs. 17 ± 3 mm, p = 0.790).

Conclusions: Enlarged MLs could reverse accompanied by LV reverse remodeling. This study provided the other facet of ML plasticity adaptive to mechanical stretching.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新发扩张型心肌病药物治疗后二尖瓣叶反向重塑。
背景:已观察到二尖瓣叶(MLs)的生长适应左心室(LV)的重塑。然而,如果二尖瓣瓣叶随着左心室反向重塑(LVRR)而收缩,那么二尖瓣瓣叶在机械刺激下的弹性就会受到影响:前瞻性地招募了特发性新发扩张型心肌病(RODCM)患者(82 人)和 50 名匹配的正常对照组(NC)。在基线和随访 6 个月时进行超声心动图检查,测量二尖瓣前后叶(AML 和 PML)长度、二尖瓣环尺寸(MAD)和撑开高度(TH)。LVRR以左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)减少≥15%为标准:结果:6 个月后,69.5% 的患者达到了 LVRR。AML(28 ± 3 vs. 26 ± 3 mm,p = 0.004)和 PML(19 ± 4 vs. 17 ± 3 mm,p < 0.001)长度减少,MAD(31 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 5 mm,p = 0.001)和 TH(10 ± 3 vs. 8 ± 2 mm,p < 0.001)长度也减少。与 NC 组相比,RODCM 组的 AML 和 PML 在基线时分别延长了 16.7% 和 35.7%,在随访时分别延长了 8.3% 和 21.2%。AML 或 PML 的变化与 LVEDV 的变化呈中度相关(分别为 r = 0.487,p < 0.001;r = 0.516,p < 0.001)。LVRR (+) 亚组的 AML 和 PML 长度减少(AML,28 ± 3 vs. 26 ± 3 mm,p = 0.001;PML,20 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 3 mm,p < 0.001),但 LVRR (-) 亚组的 AML 和 PML 长度保持不变(27 ± 4 vs. 28 ± 4 mm,p = 0.318;17 ± 3 vs. 17 ± 3 mm,p = 0.790):结论:MLs增大可伴随左心室反向重塑。该研究提供了ML对机械拉伸适应性可塑性的另一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A real-life clinical application of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocarditis - one-center observational retrospective study. Cardiovascular sequelae in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection survivors. Pregabalin and gabapentin-induced heart failure. A comparison of the management and five-year outcomes of patients treated for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 - insights from the PRESAGE registry. Effect of alcohol abuse on selected markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and endothelial function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1