Effect of income instability and social transfers on food security during COVID-19 in Tunisia

Hajer Habib, Amal Jmaii
{"title":"Effect of income instability and social transfers on food security during COVID-19 in Tunisia","authors":"Hajer Habib, Amal Jmaii","doi":"10.1108/ijse-11-2023-0867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to assess the implications of COVID-19 shocks on household income, food security and the role of social protection in Tunisia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We used food insecurity classes proposed by FAO and data from the Economic Research Forum (ERF) Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Monitor Household Survey conducted over four waves of COVID-19 (November 2020, February 2021, April 2021 and June 2021). Here, the regression of a multinomial logistic model (MLM) is used to highlight the likelihood that a respondent’s eating habits were degraded by the COVID-19 crisis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings first indicate that low-income and labor income-dependent households are the most vulnerable to shocks induced by COVID-19 and have had their food habits deteriorate considerably. Second, self-produced food by farmers who inhabit rural areas represented a food safety net during the pandemic. Finally, households that received a social transfer did not manage to overcome severe food insecurity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>As a result, the challenges are to extend social protection coverage to households that face transitory poverty.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This is among the first studies to examine the effects of COVID-19 on household income and food insecurity in Tunisia. The study uses a new survey whose main objective is to monitor the impact of health crisis on Tunisian households, taking into consideration the strong labor market fluctuations. Indeed, these fluctuations, when measured against the pre-pandemic period and subsequent periods, would help to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on households’ well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Peer review</h3>\n<p>The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-11-2023-0867.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47714,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-11-2023-0867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess the implications of COVID-19 shocks on household income, food security and the role of social protection in Tunisia.

Design/methodology/approach

We used food insecurity classes proposed by FAO and data from the Economic Research Forum (ERF) Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Monitor Household Survey conducted over four waves of COVID-19 (November 2020, February 2021, April 2021 and June 2021). Here, the regression of a multinomial logistic model (MLM) is used to highlight the likelihood that a respondent’s eating habits were degraded by the COVID-19 crisis.

Findings

The findings first indicate that low-income and labor income-dependent households are the most vulnerable to shocks induced by COVID-19 and have had their food habits deteriorate considerably. Second, self-produced food by farmers who inhabit rural areas represented a food safety net during the pandemic. Finally, households that received a social transfer did not manage to overcome severe food insecurity.

Social implications

As a result, the challenges are to extend social protection coverage to households that face transitory poverty.

Originality/value

This is among the first studies to examine the effects of COVID-19 on household income and food insecurity in Tunisia. The study uses a new survey whose main objective is to monitor the impact of health crisis on Tunisian households, taking into consideration the strong labor market fluctuations. Indeed, these fluctuations, when measured against the pre-pandemic period and subsequent periods, would help to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on households’ well-being.

Peer review

The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-11-2023-0867.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突尼斯 COVID-19 期间收入不稳定和社会转移对粮食安全的影响
本文旨在评估 COVID-19 冲击对突尼斯家庭收入、粮食安全和社会保护作用的影响。我们使用了联合国粮农组织提出的粮食不安全类别以及经济研究论坛 (ERF) 中东和北非 (MENA) 监测家庭调查的数据,该调查在 COVID-19 的四次波次(2020 年 11 月、2021 年 2 月、2021 年 4 月和 2021 年 6 月)中进行。调查结果表明,首先,低收入和依赖劳动收入的家庭最容易受到 COVID-19 引发的冲击的影响,其饮食习惯严重恶化。其次,居住在农村地区的农民自产的粮食是大流行期间的一个粮食安全网。社会影响因此,面临的挑战是将社会保护的覆盖面扩大到面临过渡性贫困的家庭。原创性/价值这是第一批研究 COVID-19 对突尼斯家庭收入和粮食不安全影响的研究之一。研究采用了一项新的调查,其主要目的是监测健康危机对突尼斯家庭的影响,同时考虑到劳动力市场的强烈波动。事实上,如果将这些波动与大流行前和随后的时期进行比较,将有助于确定 COVID-19 大流行对家庭福祉的影响。同行评审本文的同行评审历史可在以下网址查阅:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-11-2023-0867。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Economics publishes original and peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research in the field of social economics. Its focus is on the examination and analysis of the interaction between economic activity, individuals and communities. Social economics focuses on the relationship between social action and economies, and examines how social and ethical norms influence the behaviour of economic agents. It is inescapably normative and focuses on needs, rather than wants or preferences, and considers the wellbeing of individuals in communities: it accepts the possibility of a common good rather than conceiving of communities as merely aggregates of individual preferences and the problems of economics as coordinating those preferences. Therefore, contributions are invited which analyse and discuss well-being, welfare, the nature of the good society, governance and social policy, social and economic justice, social and individual economic motivation, and the associated normative and ethical implications of these as they express themselves in, for example, issues concerning the environment, labour and work, education, the role of families and women, inequality and poverty, health and human development.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of financial well-being for emerging adults: the moderating effect of financial risk tolerance The correlations between business ethics rules, talented human resource supply chain management and managing SMEs ethics: fresh insight from middle Eastern countries The role of monetary and non-monetary shocks in children’s schooling in the presence of credit market imperfection in Cameroon The impact of excess CSR expenditure on firm value and dividend payout in India: an analysis using firm age and size dynamics Envisaging Indian farmers' desires from agricultural index insurance integrating rank sum weighting method and MoSCoW technique: an approach to requirements prioritization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1