Scientific machine learning for predicting plasma concentrations in anti-cancer therapy

Diego Valderrama, Olga Teplytska, Luca Marie Koltermann, Elena Trunz, Eduard Schmulenson, Achim Fritsch, Ulrich Jaehde, Holger Fröhlich
{"title":"Scientific machine learning for predicting plasma concentrations in anti-cancer therapy","authors":"Diego Valderrama, Olga Teplytska, Luca Marie Koltermann, Elena Trunz, Eduard Schmulenson, Achim Fritsch, Ulrich Jaehde, Holger Fröhlich","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.06.24306555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of classical machine learning approaches have been developed over the past ten years with the aim to individualize drug dosages based on measured plasma concentrations. However, the interpretability of these models is challenging as they do not incorporate information on pharmacokinetic (PK) drug disposition. In this work we compare well-known population PK modelling with classical and a newly proposed scientific machine learning (SciML) framework, which combines knowledge on drug disposition with data-driven modelling. Our approach lets us estimate population PK parameters and their inter-individual variability (IIV) using multimodal covariate data of each patient. A dataset of 549 fluorouracil (5FU) plasma concentrations as example for an intravenously administered drug and a dataset of 308 sunitinib concentrations as example for an orally administered drug were used for analysis. Whereas classical machine learning models were not able to describe the data sufficiently, the proposed model allowed us to obtain highly accurate predictions even for new patients. Additionally, we demonstrated that our model could outperform traditional population PK models in terms of accuracy and greater flexibility when learning population parameters if given enough training data.","PeriodicalId":501447,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.06.24306555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of classical machine learning approaches have been developed over the past ten years with the aim to individualize drug dosages based on measured plasma concentrations. However, the interpretability of these models is challenging as they do not incorporate information on pharmacokinetic (PK) drug disposition. In this work we compare well-known population PK modelling with classical and a newly proposed scientific machine learning (SciML) framework, which combines knowledge on drug disposition with data-driven modelling. Our approach lets us estimate population PK parameters and their inter-individual variability (IIV) using multimodal covariate data of each patient. A dataset of 549 fluorouracil (5FU) plasma concentrations as example for an intravenously administered drug and a dataset of 308 sunitinib concentrations as example for an orally administered drug were used for analysis. Whereas classical machine learning models were not able to describe the data sufficiently, the proposed model allowed us to obtain highly accurate predictions even for new patients. Additionally, we demonstrated that our model could outperform traditional population PK models in terms of accuracy and greater flexibility when learning population parameters if given enough training data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学机器学习预测抗癌疗法中的血浆浓度
过去十年间,人们开发了多种经典的机器学习方法,目的是根据测量的血浆浓度确定个体化药物剂量。然而,由于这些模型没有纳入药代动力学(PK)药物处置信息,因此其可解释性具有挑战性。在这项工作中,我们将众所周知的群体 PK 模型与经典的科学机器学习(SciML)框架和新提出的科学机器学习(SciML)框架进行了比较,后者将药物处置知识与数据驱动建模相结合。通过这种方法,我们可以利用每位患者的多模态协变量数据来估计群体 PK 参数及其个体间变异性(IIV)。我们使用了 549 个氟尿嘧啶(5FU)血浆浓度数据集(以静脉注射药物为例)和 308 个舒尼替尼浓度数据集(以口服药物为例)进行分析。传统的机器学习模型无法充分描述数据,而我们提出的模型即使对新患者也能做出高度准确的预测。此外,我们还证明,如果给定足够的训练数据,我们的模型在准确性和学习群体参数的灵活性方面都优于传统的群体 PK 模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tucaresol: An Oral Candidate Drug With Two Distinct Antiviral Mechanisms. Comparative Risk of the Onset of Atrial Fibrillation after Icosapent Ethyl versus Omega-3–Acid-Ethyl-Esters Adjuvant to Statins A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. Protective Effects of Psychiatric Medications against COVID-19 Mortality Before Vaccines Anti-cancer effect of memantine as adjunctive therapy in metastatic colon cancer: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1