Experimental study on the influence of external fluids on the pore structure of carbonaceous shale

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s40948-024-00806-5
Ying Yang, Jianguang Wei, Yinhua Liu, Quanshu Zeng, Jingde Lin, Jiangtao Li
{"title":"Experimental study on the influence of external fluids on the pore structure of carbonaceous shale","authors":"Ying Yang, Jianguang Wei, Yinhua Liu, Quanshu Zeng, Jingde Lin, Jiangtao Li","doi":"10.1007/s40948-024-00806-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shale reservoirs have complex mineral compositions and are rich in micro-scale pores. It is of great scientific and engineering significance to explore the mechanism of external fluids on the pore throat structure of shale. In this paper, pure carbonaceous shale is taken as the research object, and the mechanism of the influence of slip water and reflux fluid on the pore throat structure is analyzed by using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology. Then, the sensitivity of different types of shale to external fluids is comparatively analyzed and summarized. The results show that (1) the oil slick has a certain effect on the total porosity of different types of shale. The rate of change is shown as carbonaceous shale (− 7.1%) &gt; pure shale (− 1.6%). (b) For slickwater, the average reduction of macro- and micro/nanopores in carbonaceous shale is 90.0% and 5.0%, respectively, while the average reduction of macro- and mesopores in pure shale is 17.7% and 6.8%, respectively. (c) Total porosity of different shale types is insensitive to refluxing fluids. The average increase in macro-, meso-, and small pores of carbonaceous shale is 31.8%, 23.6%, and 20.2%, respectively; the average increase in macro- and small pores of pure shale is 17.1%.</p>","PeriodicalId":12813,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00806-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shale reservoirs have complex mineral compositions and are rich in micro-scale pores. It is of great scientific and engineering significance to explore the mechanism of external fluids on the pore throat structure of shale. In this paper, pure carbonaceous shale is taken as the research object, and the mechanism of the influence of slip water and reflux fluid on the pore throat structure is analyzed by using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology. Then, the sensitivity of different types of shale to external fluids is comparatively analyzed and summarized. The results show that (1) the oil slick has a certain effect on the total porosity of different types of shale. The rate of change is shown as carbonaceous shale (− 7.1%) > pure shale (− 1.6%). (b) For slickwater, the average reduction of macro- and micro/nanopores in carbonaceous shale is 90.0% and 5.0%, respectively, while the average reduction of macro- and mesopores in pure shale is 17.7% and 6.8%, respectively. (c) Total porosity of different shale types is insensitive to refluxing fluids. The average increase in macro-, meso-, and small pores of carbonaceous shale is 31.8%, 23.6%, and 20.2%, respectively; the average increase in macro- and small pores of pure shale is 17.1%.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外部流体对碳质页岩孔隙结构影响的实验研究
页岩储层具有复杂的矿物成分和丰富的微尺度孔隙。探索外部流体对页岩孔喉结构的影响机理具有重要的科学和工程意义。本文以纯碳质页岩为研究对象,利用核磁共振(NMR)技术分析了滑移水和回流液对孔喉结构的影响机理。然后,对比分析并总结了不同类型页岩对外部流体的敏感性。结果表明:(1) 浮油对不同类型页岩的总孔隙度有一定影响。变化率表现为碳质页岩(-7.1%)> 纯页岩(-1.6%)。(b) 对于浮油,碳质页岩的大孔和微孔/纳米孔的平均减少量分别为 90.0% 和 5.0%,而纯页岩的大孔和中孔的平均减少量分别为 17.7% 和 6.8%。(c) 不同类型页岩的总孔隙率对回流流体不敏感。碳质页岩的大孔隙、中孔隙和小孔隙的平均增幅分别为 31.8%、23.6% 和 20.2%;纯页岩的大孔隙和小孔隙的平均增幅为 17.1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: This journal offers original research, new developments, and case studies in geomechanics and geophysics, focused on energy and resources in Earth’s subsurface. Covers theory, experimental results, numerical methods, modeling, engineering, technology and more.
期刊最新文献
Numerical analysis of the influence of quartz crystal anisotropy on the thermal–mechanical coupling behavior of monomineral quartzite Failure analysis of Nehbandan granite under various stress states and strain rates using a calibrated Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma constitutive model Fracture propagation characteristics of layered shale oil reservoirs with dense laminas under cyclic pressure shock fracturing Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation from recompletion in refracturing with dynamic stress modeling Criterion for hydraulic fracture propagation behaviour at coal measure composite reservoir interface based on energy release rate theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1