Resilience and purpose as predictors of Portuguese school leaders' work well-being

IF 2.1 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational Administration Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1108/jea-06-2023-0140
José Castro Silva, Ana Patricia Almeida, Patricia Pacheco, Marco Ferreira
{"title":"Resilience and purpose as predictors of Portuguese school leaders' work well-being","authors":"José Castro Silva, Ana Patricia Almeida, Patricia Pacheco, Marco Ferreira","doi":"10.1108/jea-06-2023-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Resilience and purpose have been associated with work well-being. However, limited empirical evidence exists on the liaison between these constructs and Portuguese school leaders' psychological and physical distress and work well-being. This study explored the relationships between resilience, purpose, and well-being in 921 teachers who perform leadership roles in Portuguese schools.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Participants filled out an online self-report questionnaire, providing information on sociodemographic variables. Additionally, they responded to four questionnaires evaluating purpose (PURP), resilience (RES), psychological distress (PsyD), physical distress (PhyD), and work well-being (WWB). Data were analysed through structural equation modelling and mediation analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings show that psychological and physical distress negatively predict school leadership work well-being, whereas resilience and purpose positively predict work well-being. The mediating analysis revealed one indirect mediation effect: resilience buffered the psychological distress and work well-being relationship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The main findings align with existing literature and uniquely contribute to understanding the interplay between resilience, purpose, psychological and physical distress, and work well-being. This study provides empirical support for a conceptual model claiming that purpose and resilience promote school leaders' work well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Administration","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Administration","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-06-2023-0140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Resilience and purpose have been associated with work well-being. However, limited empirical evidence exists on the liaison between these constructs and Portuguese school leaders' psychological and physical distress and work well-being. This study explored the relationships between resilience, purpose, and well-being in 921 teachers who perform leadership roles in Portuguese schools.

Design/methodology/approach

Participants filled out an online self-report questionnaire, providing information on sociodemographic variables. Additionally, they responded to four questionnaires evaluating purpose (PURP), resilience (RES), psychological distress (PsyD), physical distress (PhyD), and work well-being (WWB). Data were analysed through structural equation modelling and mediation analysis.

Findings

The findings show that psychological and physical distress negatively predict school leadership work well-being, whereas resilience and purpose positively predict work well-being. The mediating analysis revealed one indirect mediation effect: resilience buffered the psychological distress and work well-being relationship.

Originality/value

The main findings align with existing literature and uniquely contribute to understanding the interplay between resilience, purpose, psychological and physical distress, and work well-being. This study provides empirical support for a conceptual model claiming that purpose and resilience promote school leaders' work well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复原力和目标是葡萄牙学校领导工作幸福感的预测因素
目的复原力和目标与工作幸福感有关。然而,关于这些概念与葡萄牙学校领导的身心困扰和工作幸福感之间联系的实证证据却很有限。本研究探讨了在葡萄牙学校中担任领导职务的 921 名教师的复原力、目标和幸福感之间的关系。此外,他们还回答了评估目的(PURP)、复原力(RES)、心理困扰(PsyD)、身体困扰(PhyD)和工作幸福感(WWB)的四份问卷。通过结构方程建模和中介分析对数据进行了分析。研究结果研究结果表明,心理和生理困扰对学校领导的工作幸福感有负面预测作用,而复原力和目的对工作幸福感有正面预测作用。中介分析揭示了一种间接中介效应:抗挫力缓冲了心理困扰和工作幸福感之间的关系。原创性/价值主要研究结果与现有文献一致,有助于理解抗挫力、目的、心理和生理困扰以及工作幸福感之间的相互作用。本研究为一个概念模型提供了实证支持,该模型声称目的性和复原力能促进学校领导的工作幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Administration
Journal of Educational Administration EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ■Career incentives of elementary school principals ■Leadership style of principals ■Multi-level school leadership ■Organizational processes in schools ■Policy implementation ■Teaching administrative theory ■University teachers, researchers, and students of educational administration.
期刊最新文献
Profiling teacher leaders through entrepreneurial behaviours: a cluster analysis School leadership in a non-western context: how is paternalistic leadership related to teacher well-being and commitment in collectivist versus individualistic school cultures? Unveiling the associations between principal self-efficacy, openness to change and transformational leadership: the mediating role of well-being How authentic principal leadership influences teacher organisational identification via teacher academic optimism and collective responsibility: a moderated-mediation analysis Leading a successful rural school in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1