A systematic review of TPACK research in primary mathematics education

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Mathematics Education Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s13394-024-00491-3
Mao Li, Colleen Vale, Hazel Tan, Jo Blannin
{"title":"A systematic review of TPACK research in primary mathematics education","authors":"Mao Li, Colleen Vale, Hazel Tan, Jo Blannin","doi":"10.1007/s13394-024-00491-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study is a systematic review of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) studies concerning primary mathematics education published between 2005 and 2022. The aim of the systematic review was to identify the common features of previous TPACK research on primary mathematics education and identify the research gaps based on their contexts. The study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedure to investigate TPACK-related studies published during the last 17 years in the primary mathematics education domain and to evaluate the characteristics of TPACK instruments used in primary mathematics education. We identified five foci of these studies of TPACK in primary mathematics education research: designing lessons, evaluating mathematics teachers’ knowledge of integrating digital technologies, designing the assessment, evaluating training programs, and informing professional development program designs. Findings from this systematic review of the literature can assist educators in better designing professional development programs to help primary mathematics teachers improve their ability to integrate digital technology into classroom teaching. Also, the findings can assist researchers in locating TPACK instruments that are appropriate and relevant for their research. Finally, we argue that there is a research gap concerning how to measure primary mathematics teachers’ TPACK, how to design a TPACK instrument that includes contextual factors, and how to develop TPACK-oriented teacher training programs for primary mathematics teachers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46887,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics Education Research Journal","volume":"259 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00491-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is a systematic review of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) studies concerning primary mathematics education published between 2005 and 2022. The aim of the systematic review was to identify the common features of previous TPACK research on primary mathematics education and identify the research gaps based on their contexts. The study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) procedure to investigate TPACK-related studies published during the last 17 years in the primary mathematics education domain and to evaluate the characteristics of TPACK instruments used in primary mathematics education. We identified five foci of these studies of TPACK in primary mathematics education research: designing lessons, evaluating mathematics teachers’ knowledge of integrating digital technologies, designing the assessment, evaluating training programs, and informing professional development program designs. Findings from this systematic review of the literature can assist educators in better designing professional development programs to help primary mathematics teachers improve their ability to integrate digital technology into classroom teaching. Also, the findings can assist researchers in locating TPACK instruments that are appropriate and relevant for their research. Finally, we argue that there is a research gap concerning how to measure primary mathematics teachers’ TPACK, how to design a TPACK instrument that includes contextual factors, and how to develop TPACK-oriented teacher training programs for primary mathematics teachers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学数学教育中的 "数学知识包 "研究系统回顾
本研究系统回顾了 2005 年至 2022 年间发表的有关小学数学教育的技术教学与内容知识(TPACK)研究。系统综述的目的是找出以往有关小学数学教育的技术教学与内容知识研究的共同特点,并根据其背景找出研究差距。本研究采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)程序,调查了过去 17 年间发表的小学数学教育领域与 TPACK 相关的研究,并评估了小学数学教育中使用的 TPACK 工具的特点。我们确定了小学数学教育研究中 TPACK 研究的五个重点:设计课程、评估数学教师整合数字技术的知识、设计评估、评估培训项目以及为专业发展项目设计提供信息。本系统性文献综述的研究结果可以帮助教育工作者更好地设计专业发展项目,帮助小学数学教师提高将数字技术融入课堂教学的能力。此外,这些发现还有助于研究人员找到适合其研究的 TPACK 工具。最后,我们认为在如何测量小学数学教师的TPACK、如何设计包含情境因素的TPACK工具以及如何为小学数学教师开发以TPACK为导向的教师培训项目等方面还存在研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics Education Research Journal
Mathematics Education Research Journal EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Mathematics Education Research Journal seeks to promote high quality research that is of interest to the international community.   The Mathematics Education Research Journal seeks to present research that promotes new knowledge, ideas, methodologies and epistemologies in the field of mathematics education.    The Mathematics Education Research Journal actively seeks to promote research from the Australasian region either as research conducted in the region; conducted by researchers from the region and/or draws on research from the region.  The Mathematics Education Research Journal accepts papers from authors from all regions internationally but authors must draw on the extensive research that has been produced in the Australasian region.   The Mathematics Education Research Journal normally does not encourage publication of teacher education programs or courses. These are more suited for theother MERGA journal, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development.
期刊最新文献
Teacher–child interactions during shared book reading in the domain of early mathematics Defining and measuring quality in students’ mathematical writing: a systematic literature review Pre-service mathematics teachers’ personal meanings proclaiming about the characteristics of realistic mathematics problems Errors and misconceptions of secondary school students in absolute values: a systematic literature review A proposal for the study of mathematics teachers’ beliefs through the analysis of their practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1