Historical fiction: From historical accuracy to prosthetic memory

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE NEOHELICON Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s11059-024-00740-1
Alicja Bemben
{"title":"Historical fiction: From historical accuracy to prosthetic memory","authors":"Alicja Bemben","doi":"10.1007/s11059-024-00740-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, I contribute to the discussion on the cognitive value of contemporary historical fiction as a means of understanding the past. Although such means typically come from the field of history and philosophy of history, and historical accuracy seems to be the most important means, this work is concerned with historical fiction being an inspiration for an auxiliary means of the sort. Drawing on Alison Landsberg’s concept of prosthetic memory, I propose the concept of prosthetic past. In order to elaborate on the idea with an illustrative example, I use Katherine Reay’s <i>The London house</i> (2021)—a work of historical fiction that explicitly engages with the issue of historical accuracy. With regard to this, I structure the article as follows: the text opens with a broad-brush discussion of the development of the idea of understanding the past in the field of academic history and mainstream historical fiction. In the next part, I capitalise on Landsberg’s prosthetic memory to give grounds to my idea of prosthetic past and refer to <i>The London house</i> as an example with which to elaborate on it. Subsequently, I propose a tripartite discussion of the concept-cum-novel to explicate the idea of prosthetic past. The article closes with my consideration of two implications of the presented findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54002,"journal":{"name":"NEOHELICON","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEOHELICON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-024-00740-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I contribute to the discussion on the cognitive value of contemporary historical fiction as a means of understanding the past. Although such means typically come from the field of history and philosophy of history, and historical accuracy seems to be the most important means, this work is concerned with historical fiction being an inspiration for an auxiliary means of the sort. Drawing on Alison Landsberg’s concept of prosthetic memory, I propose the concept of prosthetic past. In order to elaborate on the idea with an illustrative example, I use Katherine Reay’s The London house (2021)—a work of historical fiction that explicitly engages with the issue of historical accuracy. With regard to this, I structure the article as follows: the text opens with a broad-brush discussion of the development of the idea of understanding the past in the field of academic history and mainstream historical fiction. In the next part, I capitalise on Landsberg’s prosthetic memory to give grounds to my idea of prosthetic past and refer to The London house as an example with which to elaborate on it. Subsequently, I propose a tripartite discussion of the concept-cum-novel to explicate the idea of prosthetic past. The article closes with my consideration of two implications of the presented findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史小说:从历史准确性到义肢记忆
在这篇文章中,我将为有关当代历史小说作为理解过去的一种手段的认知价值的讨论做出贡献。尽管这类手段通常来自历史学和历史哲学领域,而且历史准确性似乎是最重要的手段,但这项工作关注的是历史小说对这类辅助手段的启发。借鉴艾莉森-兰茨贝格(Alison Landsberg)的 "修复记忆"(prosthetic memory)概念,我提出了 "修复过去"(prosthetic past)的概念。为了举例说明这一概念,我使用了凯瑟琳-雷伊(Katherine Reay)的《伦敦的房子》(2021 年)--一部明确涉及历史准确性问题的历史小说作品。为此,我对文章的结构安排如下:文章开篇概括性地讨论了学术史领域和主流历史小说中理解过去这一理念的发展。在接下来的部分中,我借用兰茨贝格的 "假体记忆 "为我的 "假体过去 "概念提供依据,并以《伦敦的房子》为例进行阐述。随后,我提出了对概念兼小说的三方讨论,以阐释 "假体过去 "这一概念。文章最后,我探讨了上述研究成果的两点启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEOHELICON
NEOHELICON LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Neohelicon welcomes studies on all aspects of comparative and world literature, critical theory and practice.  In the discussion of literary historical topics (including literary movements, epochs, or regions), analytical contributions based on a solidly-anchored methodology are preferred.
期刊最新文献
Future present: cli-fi’s representational challenge Representing stream of consciousness in comics: definition and categorization Electronic literary creation: dialogues through cultural recycling The time of data. theoretical thinking, statistical thinking Past present: Coal and Hard Times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1