Path tracking with personalized handling stability constraints matched to driving styles

Qianxi Pan, Bing Zhou, Qingjia Cui, Yongxin Dong, Xiaojian Wu
{"title":"Path tracking with personalized handling stability constraints matched to driving styles","authors":"Qianxi Pan, Bing Zhou, Qingjia Cui, Yongxin Dong, Xiaojian Wu","doi":"10.1177/09544070241248557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the path-tracking control process, drivers have different expectations of the lateral response of vehicles. To meet drivers’ expectations of handling stability, this paper proposes a model predictive control (MPC)-based path-tracking controller with personalized handling stability constraints matched to driving style. Firstly, the categories of driving styles are obtained by applying the K-Means algorithm to the collected driving data. Then the sideslip angle-longitudinal velocity map is constructed based on the nonlinear dynamics model of the vehicle to generate the front-wheel steering angle constraints that are matched with the maximum sideslip of the vehicle expected by drivers of different styles. After that, an MPC-based path-tracking controller has been built, and the front-wheel steering angle is incorporated into the MPC controller. Furthermore, compared to the strategy of directly using sideslip angle constraints for handling stability control, this approach avoids introducing additional constraint variables, leading to improved real-time performance. Simulation experiments are conducted to compare the dynamic vehicle responses between the handling stability control that takes into account the driving style and the control system that does not consider the driving style. In addition, the subjective evaluation is conducted to verify the proposed path-tracking control method that considers the stability constraints of driving style. The evaluation results show that the proposed method can obtain better subjective evaluation results than a path-tracking controller that does not consider the driving style. Finally, through the hardware-in-the-loop experiments, the real-time computational capability of the proposed controller is verified.","PeriodicalId":54568,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal of Automobile Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal of Automobile Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070241248557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the path-tracking control process, drivers have different expectations of the lateral response of vehicles. To meet drivers’ expectations of handling stability, this paper proposes a model predictive control (MPC)-based path-tracking controller with personalized handling stability constraints matched to driving style. Firstly, the categories of driving styles are obtained by applying the K-Means algorithm to the collected driving data. Then the sideslip angle-longitudinal velocity map is constructed based on the nonlinear dynamics model of the vehicle to generate the front-wheel steering angle constraints that are matched with the maximum sideslip of the vehicle expected by drivers of different styles. After that, an MPC-based path-tracking controller has been built, and the front-wheel steering angle is incorporated into the MPC controller. Furthermore, compared to the strategy of directly using sideslip angle constraints for handling stability control, this approach avoids introducing additional constraint variables, leading to improved real-time performance. Simulation experiments are conducted to compare the dynamic vehicle responses between the handling stability control that takes into account the driving style and the control system that does not consider the driving style. In addition, the subjective evaluation is conducted to verify the proposed path-tracking control method that considers the stability constraints of driving style. The evaluation results show that the proposed method can obtain better subjective evaluation results than a path-tracking controller that does not consider the driving style. Finally, through the hardware-in-the-loop experiments, the real-time computational capability of the proposed controller is verified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据驾驶风格提供个性化操控稳定性约束的路径跟踪功能
在路径跟踪控制过程中,驾驶员对车辆的横向响应有不同的期望。为了满足驾驶员对操纵稳定性的期望,本文提出了一种基于模型预测控制(MPC)的路径跟踪控制器,该控制器具有与驾驶风格相匹配的个性化操纵稳定性约束。首先,通过对收集到的驾驶数据应用 K-Means 算法获得驾驶风格类别。然后,根据车辆的非线性动力学模型构建侧倾角-纵向速度图,生成与不同风格驾驶员所期望的车辆最大侧倾相匹配的前轮转向角约束。然后,建立基于 MPC 的路径跟踪控制器,并将前轮转向角纳入 MPC 控制器。此外,与直接使用侧倾角约束进行操纵稳定性控制的策略相比,这种方法避免了引入额外的约束变量,从而提高了实时性。通过仿真实验,比较了考虑驾驶风格的操纵稳定性控制与不考虑驾驶风格的控制系统之间的车辆动态响应。此外,还进行了主观评价,以验证所提出的考虑驾驶风格稳定性约束的路径跟踪控制方法。评价结果表明,与不考虑驾驶风格的路径跟踪控制器相比,所提出的方法能获得更好的主观评价结果。最后,通过硬件在环实验,验证了所提控制器的实时计算能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Automobile Engineering is an established, high quality multi-disciplinary journal which publishes the very best peer-reviewed science and engineering in the field.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of simplex and duplex drum brakes linings with transverse slots in vehicles Scenario-aware clustered federated learning for vehicle trajectory prediction with non-IID data Vehicle trajectory prediction method integrating spatiotemporal relationships with hybrid time-step scene interaction Research on Obstacle Avoidance Strategy of Automated Heavy Vehicle Platoon in High-Speed Scenarios Cooperative energy optimal control involving optimization of longitudinal motion, powertrain, and air conditioning systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1