Automatic Lymph Nodes Segmentation and Histological Status Classification on Computed Tomography Scans Using Convolutional Neural Network

Alexey Shevtsov, Iaroslav Tominin, Vladislav Tominin, Vsevolod Malevanniy, Yury Esakov, Zurab Tukvadze, Andrey Nefedov, Piotr Yablonskii, Pavel Gavrilov, Vadim Kozlov, Mariya Blokhina, Elena Nalivkina, Victor Gombolevskiy, Yuriy Vasilev, Mariya Dugova, Valeria Chernina, Olga Omelyanskaya, Roman Reshetnikov, Ivan Blokhin, Mikhail Belyaev
{"title":"Automatic Lymph Nodes Segmentation and Histological Status Classification on Computed Tomography Scans Using Convolutional Neural Network","authors":"Alexey Shevtsov, Iaroslav Tominin, Vladislav Tominin, Vsevolod Malevanniy, Yury Esakov, Zurab Tukvadze, Andrey Nefedov, Piotr Yablonskii, Pavel Gavrilov, Vadim Kozlov, Mariya Blokhina, Elena Nalivkina, Victor Gombolevskiy, Yuriy Vasilev, Mariya Dugova, Valeria Chernina, Olga Omelyanskaya, Roman Reshetnikov, Ivan Blokhin, Mikhail Belyaev","doi":"10.1101/2024.05.07.24304092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer worldwide, making up about 20% of all cancer deaths with less than 10% 5-year survival rate for the very late stage. The recent guidelines for the most common non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) type recommend performing staging based on the 8th edition of TNM classification, where the mediastinal lymph node involvement plays a key role. However, most of the non-invasive methods have a very limited level of sensitivity and are relatively accurate, but invasive methods can be contradicted for some patients. Current advances in Deep Learning show great potential in solving such problems. Still, most of these works focus on the algorithmic side of the problem, not the clinical relevance. Moreover, none of them addressed individual lymph node malignancy classification problem, restricting the indirect analysis of the whole study, and limiting the interpretability of the result without giving an option for cliniciansto validate the result. This work mitigates these gaps, proposing a multi-step algorithm for each visible mediastinal lymph node segmentation and assessing the probability of its involvement in themetastatic process, using the results of histological verification on training. The developed pipelineshows 0.74 ± 0.01 average Recall with 0.53 ± 0.26 object Dice Score for the clinically relevant lymph nodes segmentation task and 0.73 ROC AUC for patient’s N-stage prediction, outperformingtraditional size-based criteria.","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.07.24304092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer worldwide, making up about 20% of all cancer deaths with less than 10% 5-year survival rate for the very late stage. The recent guidelines for the most common non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) type recommend performing staging based on the 8th edition of TNM classification, where the mediastinal lymph node involvement plays a key role. However, most of the non-invasive methods have a very limited level of sensitivity and are relatively accurate, but invasive methods can be contradicted for some patients. Current advances in Deep Learning show great potential in solving such problems. Still, most of these works focus on the algorithmic side of the problem, not the clinical relevance. Moreover, none of them addressed individual lymph node malignancy classification problem, restricting the indirect analysis of the whole study, and limiting the interpretability of the result without giving an option for cliniciansto validate the result. This work mitigates these gaps, proposing a multi-step algorithm for each visible mediastinal lymph node segmentation and assessing the probability of its involvement in themetastatic process, using the results of histological verification on training. The developed pipelineshows 0.74 ± 0.01 average Recall with 0.53 ± 0.26 object Dice Score for the clinically relevant lymph nodes segmentation task and 0.73 ROC AUC for patient’s N-stage prediction, outperformingtraditional size-based criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用卷积神经网络对计算机断层扫描图像进行淋巴结自动分割和组织学状态分类
肺癌是全球第二大常见癌症,约占癌症死亡总数的 20%,晚期患者的 5 年生存率不到 10%。针对最常见的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)类型,最近的指南建议根据第 8 版 TNM 分类法进行分期,其中纵隔淋巴结受累起着关键作用。然而,大多数非侵入性方法的灵敏度非常有限,准确度相对较高,但侵入性方法对某些患者可能会产生矛盾。目前,深度学习技术的进步显示出解决此类问题的巨大潜力。不过,这些研究大多侧重于问题的算法方面,而非临床相关性。此外,它们都没有解决单个淋巴结恶性分类问题,从而限制了对整个研究的间接分析,并限制了结果的可解释性,没有为临床医生提供验证结果的选项。这项工作弥补了这些不足,提出了一种多步骤算法,利用训练中的组织学验证结果,对每个可见纵隔淋巴结进行分割,并评估其参与转移过程的概率。所开发的管道在临床相关淋巴结分割任务中显示出 0.74 ± 0.01 的平均 Recall 值和 0.53 ± 0.26 的对象 Dice Score 值,在患者 N 分期预测中显示出 0.73 的 ROC AUC 值,优于传统的基于大小的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auto-segmentation of hemi-diaphragms in free-breathing dynamic MRI of pediatric subjects with thoracic insufficiency syndrome Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning Exploring subthreshold functional network alterations in women with phenylketonuria by higher criticism Beyond Algorithms: The Impact of Simplified CNN Models and Multifactorial Influences on Radiological Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1