Audience evaluations of news videos made with various levels of automation: A population-based survey experiment

IF 2.7 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/14648849241243189
Neil Thurman, Sally Stares, Michael Koliska
{"title":"Audience evaluations of news videos made with various levels of automation: A population-based survey experiment","authors":"Neil Thurman, Sally Stares, Michael Koliska","doi":"10.1177/14648849241243189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of automation in news content creation is expanding from the written to the audio-visual medium with news organizations including Reuters turning to video automation services provided by companies such as Wibbitz. Although researchers have explored audience perceptions of text-based news automation, to date no published study has examined how news consumers perceive automated news videos. We conducted a between-subjects online survey experiment to compare how a socio-demographically representative sample ( n = 4200) of online news consumers in the UK perceived human-made, partly automated, and highly automated short-form online news videos on 14 different story topics. Our findings show that human-made videos received on average more favourable responses on some evaluation variables, although the differences were not large. We also found some significant differences in the relative evaluation of automated and human-made news videos across different individual stories. For practitioners our results suggest partly automated news videos with post-automation human editing can be well received. For researchers our results show the need to use reasonably large sets of experimental stimuli, and suggest that ensuring socio-demographic variation within samples of respondents is worthwhile.","PeriodicalId":51432,"journal":{"name":"Journalism","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241243189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of automation in news content creation is expanding from the written to the audio-visual medium with news organizations including Reuters turning to video automation services provided by companies such as Wibbitz. Although researchers have explored audience perceptions of text-based news automation, to date no published study has examined how news consumers perceive automated news videos. We conducted a between-subjects online survey experiment to compare how a socio-demographically representative sample ( n = 4200) of online news consumers in the UK perceived human-made, partly automated, and highly automated short-form online news videos on 14 different story topics. Our findings show that human-made videos received on average more favourable responses on some evaluation variables, although the differences were not large. We also found some significant differences in the relative evaluation of automated and human-made news videos across different individual stories. For practitioners our results suggest partly automated news videos with post-automation human editing can be well received. For researchers our results show the need to use reasonably large sets of experimental stimuli, and suggest that ensuring socio-demographic variation within samples of respondents is worthwhile.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观众对不同自动化程度的新闻视频的评价:基于人群的调查实验
自动化在新闻内容创作中的应用正从文字媒介扩展到视听媒介,包括路透社在内的新闻机构都开始使用 Wibbitz 等公司提供的视频自动化服务。虽然研究人员已经探讨了受众对基于文本的新闻自动化的看法,但迄今为止,还没有公开发表的研究对新闻消费者如何看待自动化新闻视频进行过探讨。我们进行了一项主体间在线调查实验,比较了具有社会人口代表性的英国在线新闻消费者样本(n = 4200)对 14 个不同新闻主题的人造、部分自动化和高度自动化在线新闻短视频的看法。我们的研究结果表明,人造视频在某些评价变量上平均获得了更多的好评,尽管差异并不大。我们还发现,在不同的新闻报道中,对自动化和人工制作的新闻视频的相对评价存在一些显著差异。对于从业人员来说,我们的结果表明,经过后期人工编辑的部分自动化新闻视频会受到好评。对于研究人员来说,我们的结果表明需要使用相当大的实验刺激,并建议确保受访者样本中的社会人口差异是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism
Journalism COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Journalism is a major international, peer-reviewed journal that provides a dedicated forum for articles from the growing community of academic researchers and critical practitioners with an interest in journalism. The journal is interdisciplinary and publishes both theoretical and empirical work and contributes to the social, economic, political, cultural and practical understanding of journalism. It includes contributions on current developments and historical changes within journalism.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge can wait? The epistemic conversion of new beat reporters Behind the black box: The moderating role of the machine heuristic on the effect of transparency information about automated journalism on hostile media bias perception Citizen journalism revisited: A case study of Kenya’s kibera news network (De)politicization of the environmental agenda in Russian media Why media platforms police the boundaries of impartiality: A comparative analysis of television news and fact-checking in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1