Standardized transect walks outperform pan traps in assessing wild bee community in a Mediterranean protected area (Asinara National Park, Italy)

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biodiversity and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10531-024-02850-9
Matteo Lezzeri, Vanessa Lozano, Giuseppe Brundu, Ignazio Floris, Michelina Pusceddu, Marino Quaranta, Alberto Satta
{"title":"Standardized transect walks outperform pan traps in assessing wild bee community in a Mediterranean protected area (Asinara National Park, Italy)","authors":"Matteo Lezzeri, Vanessa Lozano, Giuseppe Brundu, Ignazio Floris, Michelina Pusceddu, Marino Quaranta, Alberto Satta","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02850-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The decline of pollinator insects in various parts of the world has increased the interest in studies on bee sampling. Because pollinator management and conservation policies depend on data representing their communities, knowledge of the systematic bias of sampling methods in relation to surrounding habitat is fundamental. This study examined the performance of standardized transect walks and colored pan traps considering differences in bee species richness, diversity, and composition, and the potential bias due to a different availability of floral sources throughout seasons. The study was conducted in a minor outlying island (Asinara, Italy), a natural park characterized by the prevalence of natural or semi-natural habitats and an Oceanic Pluviseasonal Mediterranean bioclimate. We found that transect and pan trap methods reflected different bee communities based on taxonomic families, genera, and species. In general, the transect method captured more varied samples than pan traps, despite the significantly lower number of individuals captured on transects. Moreover, pan traps captured more bees as floral abundance decreased, whereas transects showed greater bee abundance, richness, and diversity with increasing floral resource availability. In addition, 18 species out of the 68 observed in total were caught exclusively with pan traps, especially in July–October, when transect catches decreased due to substantial bloom reduction. Therefore, alternating the two methods according to season (i.e., transect in late winter-spring and pan trap in summer-autumn) might be the most suitable trade-off to obtain a better representation of the bee community by limiting sampling efforts and the negative impact on bee fauna.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"162 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02850-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decline of pollinator insects in various parts of the world has increased the interest in studies on bee sampling. Because pollinator management and conservation policies depend on data representing their communities, knowledge of the systematic bias of sampling methods in relation to surrounding habitat is fundamental. This study examined the performance of standardized transect walks and colored pan traps considering differences in bee species richness, diversity, and composition, and the potential bias due to a different availability of floral sources throughout seasons. The study was conducted in a minor outlying island (Asinara, Italy), a natural park characterized by the prevalence of natural or semi-natural habitats and an Oceanic Pluviseasonal Mediterranean bioclimate. We found that transect and pan trap methods reflected different bee communities based on taxonomic families, genera, and species. In general, the transect method captured more varied samples than pan traps, despite the significantly lower number of individuals captured on transects. Moreover, pan traps captured more bees as floral abundance decreased, whereas transects showed greater bee abundance, richness, and diversity with increasing floral resource availability. In addition, 18 species out of the 68 observed in total were caught exclusively with pan traps, especially in July–October, when transect catches decreased due to substantial bloom reduction. Therefore, alternating the two methods according to season (i.e., transect in late winter-spring and pan trap in summer-autumn) might be the most suitable trade-off to obtain a better representation of the bee community by limiting sampling efforts and the negative impact on bee fauna.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在评估地中海保护区(意大利阿西纳拉国家公园)野生蜜蜂群落方面,标准化横断面步行优于平板诱捕器
世界各地授粉昆虫数量的减少增加了人们对蜜蜂取样研究的兴趣。由于授粉昆虫的管理和保护政策依赖于代表其群落的数据,因此了解采样方法与周围栖息地的系统偏差至关重要。考虑到蜜蜂物种丰富度、多样性和组成的差异,以及四季花源不同造成的潜在偏差,本研究考察了标准化横断面行走和彩盘捕获器的性能。这项研究是在一个离岛(意大利阿西纳拉)进行的,该自然公园的特点是自然或半自然栖息地和大洋洲地中海生物气候。我们发现,横断面法和盘捕法根据分类学上的科、属和种反映了不同的蜜蜂群落。总体而言,横断面捕获法比平底锅捕获法捕获的样本种类更多,尽管横断面捕获法捕获的个体数量要少得多。此外,随着花卉丰度的降低,盘式诱捕器捕获了更多的蜜蜂,而横断面法则随着花卉资源可用性的增加而显示出更高的蜜蜂丰度、丰富度和多样性。此外,在总共观察到的 68 个物种中,有 18 个物种完全是用盘式诱捕器捕获的,特别是在 7 月至 10 月,由于花期大幅减少,横断面的捕获量也随之减少。因此,根据季节交替使用两种方法(即在冬末春初使用横断面方法,在夏秋季使用盘式诱捕器)可能是最合适的权衡方法,这样可以通过限制取样工作量和对蜜蜂动物群落的负面影响来获得更好的蜜蜂群落代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications The iconic Jubaea chilensis teeters on the edge of local extinction: a plea for enhanced conservation policies High site fidelity and reduced survival of a mycophagous mammal after prescribed fire An assessment of liverwort richness, endemicity and conservation in a megadiverse country - Colombia Wilderness areas maintain mammal assemblage in subtropical mountain forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1