Accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting contralateral patent processus vaginalis compared with laparoscopic findings in children

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1186/s43054-024-00258-2
Abeer Aboalazayem, Hadeel Seif, Sherif Kaddah, Mohamed Elbarbary, Ahmed MK Wishahy
{"title":"Accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting contralateral patent processus vaginalis compared with laparoscopic findings in children","authors":"Abeer Aboalazayem, Hadeel Seif, Sherif Kaddah, Mohamed Elbarbary, Ahmed MK Wishahy","doi":"10.1186/s43054-024-00258-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography (US) at the internal inguinal ring level in predicting contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV). This is a prospective study of patients who presented with unilateral inguinal hernia and underwent laparoscopic hernia repair and contralateral side exploration. The gender, age, initial presenting side, and the preoperative width of the low echoic region at the internal ring (WLIR) of the contralateral side that was determined using US and laparoscopic findings were recorded. The preoperative diagnosis of CPPV was considered if the WLIR is > 4 mm. We compared laparoscopic with US findings. This study included 30 patients with a median age of 3.5 years (range, 25 days to 10 years), with 3 females and 27 males. The preoperative US and laparoscopic diagnoses of the contralateral side were concordant in 19 (63.3%) and discordant in 11 (36.6%) patients. US showed a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 72.22%, and accuracy of 63.3% in diagnosing CPPV. Measuring the WLIR by US was inadequate for an accurate CPPV diagnosis in our study. Therefore, more distinctive US criteria are required for a proper CPPV diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":43064,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-024-00258-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography (US) at the internal inguinal ring level in predicting contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV). This is a prospective study of patients who presented with unilateral inguinal hernia and underwent laparoscopic hernia repair and contralateral side exploration. The gender, age, initial presenting side, and the preoperative width of the low echoic region at the internal ring (WLIR) of the contralateral side that was determined using US and laparoscopic findings were recorded. The preoperative diagnosis of CPPV was considered if the WLIR is > 4 mm. We compared laparoscopic with US findings. This study included 30 patients with a median age of 3.5 years (range, 25 days to 10 years), with 3 females and 27 males. The preoperative US and laparoscopic diagnoses of the contralateral side were concordant in 19 (63.3%) and discordant in 11 (36.6%) patients. US showed a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 72.22%, and accuracy of 63.3% in diagnosing CPPV. Measuring the WLIR by US was inadequate for an accurate CPPV diagnosis in our study. Therefore, more distinctive US criteria are required for a proper CPPV diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与腹腔镜检查结果相比,超声波检查在预测儿童对侧阴道前突方面的准确性
本研究旨在评估术前腹股沟内环水平超声波成像(US)在预测对侧阴道前突(CPPV)方面的作用。这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象为单侧腹股沟疝并接受腹腔镜疝修补术和对侧探查术的患者。研究记录了患者的性别、年龄、最初发病的一侧,以及术前使用 US 和腹腔镜检查结果确定的对侧内环低回声区(WLIR)的宽度。如果 WLIR > 4 mm,则认为术前诊断为 CPPV。我们比较了腹腔镜和超声检查的结果。本研究共纳入 30 名患者,中位年龄为 3.5 岁(25 天至 10 岁),其中女性 3 名,男性 27 名。术前美学诊断和腹腔镜诊断对侧一致的患者有 19 人(63.3%),不一致的患者有 11 人(36.6%)。US 对 CPPV 诊断的敏感性为 50.00%,特异性为 72.22%,准确性为 63.3%。在我们的研究中,通过 US 测量 WLIR 不足以准确诊断 CPPV。因此,正确诊断 CPPV 需要更明确的 US 标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Gazette is the official journal of the Egyptian Pediatric Association. The main purpose of the Gazette is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in both pediatrics and pediatric surgery in clinical and experimental settings. An equally important purpose of the Gazette is to publish local and regional issues related to children and child care. The Gazette welcomes original papers, review articles, case reports and short communications as well as short technical reports. Papers submitted to the Gazette are peer-reviewed by a large review board. The Gazette also offers CME quizzes, credits for which can be claimed from either the EPA website or the EPA headquarters. Fields of interest: all aspects of pediatrics, pediatric surgery, child health and child care. The Gazette complies with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
期刊最新文献
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children treated with intravenous immunoglobulin monotherapy: a single-center retrospective study Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a known case of beta-thalassemia major after blood transfusion: a case presentation Egyptian paediatric kidney transplantation pre-transplant guidance highlights on donor and recipient assessment (R. N. 364) Prevalence and CCR3-T51C genotype–phenotype correlation of bronchial asthma among basic education school children: an observational study Fever of unknown origin in pediatrics: causes and clinical characteristics in a single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1