An exploratory study of the immediate and medium-term effects of bench terrace construction on the ground-dwelling arthropod communities in eucalypt plantations
Martinho A. S. Martins, Liliana B. Simões, João R. L. Puga, J. Jacob Keizer, Nelson J. C. Abrantes
{"title":"An exploratory study of the immediate and medium-term effects of bench terrace construction on the ground-dwelling arthropod communities in eucalypt plantations","authors":"Martinho A. S. Martins, Liliana B. Simões, João R. L. Puga, J. Jacob Keizer, Nelson J. C. Abrantes","doi":"10.1007/s42974-024-00197-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest terracing operations imply a massive mobilization of topsoil. Nonetheless, its impacts on soil properties, functions and ecosystem services have been poorly quantified so far. Therefore, this study aimed to explore how bulldozer bench terracing may impact the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropod communities of eucalypt plantations. To this end, three neighbouring sites were selected of which one had not been terraced a –(NT), one had been terraced recently (two months earlier; -RT) and one had been terraced more than a decade (14 years ago; OT). The exploratory nature of this study involved furthermore a single sampling occasion (during spring), and taxonomic identification till the level of order and, in the case of the most frequent orders, (sub-)family. The arthropod communities of the RT site and the NT site did not reveal significant differences in terms of either total abundance or order richness, suggesting that immediate effects of terracing on these aspects of biodiversity may be limited. Nonetheless, notable differences did exist between these two sites for two out of the three prevailing orders. Araneae occurred with a markedly lower abundance as well as family richness at the RT site than at the NT site, while the opposite was true for the Coleoptera, at least in terms of family richness. The communities of the RT site and the OT site also did not evidence substantial differences in abundance or order richness, indicating that terracing effects on these aspects may not increase with time-since-terracing. In fact, the opposite was suggested, since none of the three prevailing orders revealed significant differences in abundance or richness between the two sites. In spite of the reduced effects observed here of massive soil mobilization by bulldozer terracing, further research is plainly justified not only because of the exploratory nature of this study but also the widespread bench terracing in the study region. The present results suggested that such further research should focus on the impacts during the first decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":50994,"journal":{"name":"Community Ecology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-024-00197-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forest terracing operations imply a massive mobilization of topsoil. Nonetheless, its impacts on soil properties, functions and ecosystem services have been poorly quantified so far. Therefore, this study aimed to explore how bulldozer bench terracing may impact the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropod communities of eucalypt plantations. To this end, three neighbouring sites were selected of which one had not been terraced a –(NT), one had been terraced recently (two months earlier; -RT) and one had been terraced more than a decade (14 years ago; OT). The exploratory nature of this study involved furthermore a single sampling occasion (during spring), and taxonomic identification till the level of order and, in the case of the most frequent orders, (sub-)family. The arthropod communities of the RT site and the NT site did not reveal significant differences in terms of either total abundance or order richness, suggesting that immediate effects of terracing on these aspects of biodiversity may be limited. Nonetheless, notable differences did exist between these two sites for two out of the three prevailing orders. Araneae occurred with a markedly lower abundance as well as family richness at the RT site than at the NT site, while the opposite was true for the Coleoptera, at least in terms of family richness. The communities of the RT site and the OT site also did not evidence substantial differences in abundance or order richness, indicating that terracing effects on these aspects may not increase with time-since-terracing. In fact, the opposite was suggested, since none of the three prevailing orders revealed significant differences in abundance or richness between the two sites. In spite of the reduced effects observed here of massive soil mobilization by bulldozer terracing, further research is plainly justified not only because of the exploratory nature of this study but also the widespread bench terracing in the study region. The present results suggested that such further research should focus on the impacts during the first decade.
森林梯田作业意味着表土的大量移动。然而,迄今为止,其对土壤特性、功能和生态系统服务的影响还很少被量化。因此,本研究旨在探讨推土机台阶梯田如何影响桉树种植园地栖节肢动物群落的丰度和多样性。为此,研究人员选取了三个相邻的地点,其中一个尚未实施梯田改造(-(NT)),一个最近实施了梯田改造(两个月前;-RT),一个实施梯田改造已超过十年(14 年前;OT)。这项研究的探索性质还包括一次取样(春季)和分类鉴定(直到目一级),对于最常见的目,还包括(亚)科。从总丰度或目次丰富度来看,RT 地点和新界地点的节肢动物群落并无显著差异,这表明梯田对生物多样性的这些方面的直接影响可能有限。不过,这两个地点的三个主要类群中有两个存在明显差异。在 RT 区,有孔虫类的丰度和科的丰富度明显低于 NT 区,而鞘翅目的情况正好相反,至少在科的丰富度方面是如此。RT 地点和 OT 地点的群落在丰度或阶次丰富度方面也没有明显差异,这表明梯田对这些方面的影响可能不会随着梯田开挖时间的推移而增加。事实上,情况恰恰相反,因为两个地点的三个主要类群在丰度和丰富度方面都没有显著差异。尽管在本研究中观察到推土机修筑梯田造成的大规模土壤移动的影响有所减弱,但由于本研究的探索性质,以及研究地区广泛存在的台阶梯田,进一步的研究显然是有必要的。本研究结果表明,进一步研究的重点应放在前十年的影响上。
期刊介绍:
Community Ecology, established by the merger of two ecological periodicals, Coenoses and Abstracta Botanica was launched in an effort to create a common global forum for community ecologists dealing with plant, animal and/or microbial communities from terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems. Main subject areas: (i) community-based ecological theory; (ii) modelling of ecological communities; (iii) community-based ecophysiology; (iv) temporal dynamics, including succession; (v) trophic interactions, including food webs and competition; (vi) spatial pattern analysis, including scaling issues; (vii) community patterns of species richness and diversity; (viii) sampling ecological communities; (ix) data analysis methods.