Mapping the landscape: unveiling the structural dynamics of industry platforms

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Journal of Innovation Management Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0748
Khaled Abed Alghani, Marko Kohtamäki, Sascha Kraus
{"title":"Mapping the landscape: unveiling the structural dynamics of industry platforms","authors":"Khaled Abed Alghani, Marko Kohtamäki, Sascha Kraus","doi":"10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p> The proliferation of industry platforms has disrupted several industries. Firms adopting a platform business model have experienced a substantial expansion in size and scale, positioning themselves as the foremost valuable entities in market capitalization. Over the past two decades, there has been a substantial expansion in the body of literature dedicated to platforms, and different streams of research have emerged. Despite considerable efforts and the significant progress made in recent years toward a comprehensive understanding of industry platforms, there is still room for further harnessing the field’s diversity. As a result, the aim of this article is to examine the field’s structure, identify research concerns and provide suggestions for future research, thereby enhancing the overall understanding of industry platforms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> We conducted a thorough examination of 458 articles on the topic using bibliometric methods and systematic review techniques.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p> Through co-citation analysis, we identified five distinct clusters rooted in various bodies of literature: two-sided markets, industry platforms, digital platforms, innovation platforms and two-sided networks. Furthermore, the examination of these five clusters has revealed three key areas that demand further consideration: (1) terminologies, (2) classifications and (3) perspectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p> While previous reviews have provided valuable insights into the topic of industry platforms, none have explored the structure of the field so far. Consequently, as a first step toward advancing the field, we uncover the structure of the literature, identifying three major areas of concern. By addressing these concerns, our goal is to converge different clusters, thereby harnessing the diversity in the field and enhancing the overall understanding of industry platforms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The proliferation of industry platforms has disrupted several industries. Firms adopting a platform business model have experienced a substantial expansion in size and scale, positioning themselves as the foremost valuable entities in market capitalization. Over the past two decades, there has been a substantial expansion in the body of literature dedicated to platforms, and different streams of research have emerged. Despite considerable efforts and the significant progress made in recent years toward a comprehensive understanding of industry platforms, there is still room for further harnessing the field’s diversity. As a result, the aim of this article is to examine the field’s structure, identify research concerns and provide suggestions for future research, thereby enhancing the overall understanding of industry platforms.

Design/methodology/approach

We conducted a thorough examination of 458 articles on the topic using bibliometric methods and systematic review techniques.

Findings

Through co-citation analysis, we identified five distinct clusters rooted in various bodies of literature: two-sided markets, industry platforms, digital platforms, innovation platforms and two-sided networks. Furthermore, the examination of these five clusters has revealed three key areas that demand further consideration: (1) terminologies, (2) classifications and (3) perspectives.

Originality/value

While previous reviews have provided valuable insights into the topic of industry platforms, none have explored the structure of the field so far. Consequently, as a first step toward advancing the field, we uncover the structure of the literature, identifying three major areas of concern. By addressing these concerns, our goal is to converge different clusters, thereby harnessing the diversity in the field and enhancing the overall understanding of industry platforms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制景观图:揭示行业平台的结构动态
目的 行业平台的激增颠覆了多个行业。采用平台商业模式的公司在规模和尺度上经历了大幅扩张,成为市值最高的有价值实体。在过去二十年里,有关平台的文献大量增加,出现了不同的研究流派。尽管近年来在全面了解行业平台方面做出了大量努力并取得了重大进展,但仍有进一步利用该领域多样性的空间。因此,本文旨在研究该领域的结构,确定研究关注点,并为未来研究提供建议,从而加深对产业平台的整体理解。研究结果 通过联合引用分析,我们确定了植根于不同文献中的五个不同集群:双面市场、产业平台、数字平台、创新平台和双面网络。此外,对这五个群组的研究揭示了需要进一步考虑的三个关键领域:(1) 术语,(2) 分类和 (3) 视角。 原创性/价值 虽然以往的综述为行业平台这一主题提供了宝贵的见解,但迄今为止还没有一篇综述对这一领域的结构进行了探讨。因此,作为推动该领域发展的第一步,我们揭示了文献的结构,确定了三个主要关注领域。通过解决这些问题,我们的目标是汇聚不同的研究集群,从而利用该领域的多样性,增强对产业平台的整体理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the impact of technological innovation and SMEs resilience: the moderating role of firms' social sustainability orientation Involving lead users in firm’s standardization strategy within action groups: evidence from smart robotics “Every idea made life easier:” A critical discourse analysis of creative employee-driven innovation in the Italian healthcare system How the digital environment moderates disruptive technology and digital entrepreneurship relationship in emerging markets Innovating the bank-firm relationship: a spherical fuzzy approach to SME funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1