A Model Dependent Scoping Review of Research on Sexism and Racism in Major Behavior Analytic Journals

IF 1.6 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Behavior and Social Issues Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s42822-024-00167-4
Claire Zuch, Jordan Belisle, Dana Paliliunas, Ashley Payne, Elana Sickman, Breanna Lee, Lindsey Dennis
{"title":"A Model Dependent Scoping Review of Research on Sexism and Racism in Major Behavior Analytic Journals","authors":"Claire Zuch, Jordan Belisle, Dana Paliliunas, Ashley Payne, Elana Sickman, Breanna Lee, Lindsey Dennis","doi":"10.1007/s42822-024-00167-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavior analysts are becoming increasingly aware of and involved in the study of issues related to sex, gender, and racial prejudice and discrimination. In the current article, we conceptualized sexism and gender bias informed by the framework of the nested sociobehavioral model of racism developed by Belisle et al. <i>Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15</i>(4), 1134–1150 (2022), including implicit bias, selective gender norms, and systemic oppression, while integrating feminist and queer theories. We then conducted a model-dependent scoping review of research in major behavior analytic journals from 2000 to 2022 related to racism and sexism categorized using the nested models and the theory-to-impact framework developed by Dixon et al. <i>Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41</i>(1), 241–267 (2018). Of the 10 journals included for the scoping review, nine contained research related to racism or sexism and an overall increasing trend appears to be occurring in the field. Inconsistencies were evident between conceptual work that emphasized systemic oppression versus experimental work that emphasizes implicit bias and relational framing. Only three studies met the criteria for “applied” or “implementation” research, suggesting that significantly more research is needed to inform the development and dissemination of applied technologies. We conclude with a discussion of the current state of this research in multiple areas and recommendations for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44553,"journal":{"name":"Behavior and Social Issues","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior and Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-024-00167-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavior analysts are becoming increasingly aware of and involved in the study of issues related to sex, gender, and racial prejudice and discrimination. In the current article, we conceptualized sexism and gender bias informed by the framework of the nested sociobehavioral model of racism developed by Belisle et al. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1134–1150 (2022), including implicit bias, selective gender norms, and systemic oppression, while integrating feminist and queer theories. We then conducted a model-dependent scoping review of research in major behavior analytic journals from 2000 to 2022 related to racism and sexism categorized using the nested models and the theory-to-impact framework developed by Dixon et al. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 241–267 (2018). Of the 10 journals included for the scoping review, nine contained research related to racism or sexism and an overall increasing trend appears to be occurring in the field. Inconsistencies were evident between conceptual work that emphasized systemic oppression versus experimental work that emphasizes implicit bias and relational framing. Only three studies met the criteria for “applied” or “implementation” research, suggesting that significantly more research is needed to inform the development and dissemination of applied technologies. We conclude with a discussion of the current state of this research in multiple areas and recommendations for future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主要行为分析期刊中有关性别主义和种族主义研究的模式依赖性范围审查
行为分析学家对性、性别以及种族偏见和歧视相关问题的认识和研究日益加深。在这篇文章中,我们根据贝利索等人开发的种族主义嵌套社会行为模型(Belisle et al. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1134-1150 (2022))框架,对性别主义和性别偏见进行了概念化,包括隐性偏见、选择性性别规范和系统性压迫,同时结合了女权主义和同性恋理论。然后,我们对 2000 年至 2022 年主要行为分析期刊中与种族主义和性别歧视有关的研究进行了一次依赖于模型的范围界定综述,综述采用了 Dixon 等人开发的嵌套模型和理论到影响框架(Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 241-267 (2018))。在范围界定研究收录的 10 种期刊中,有 9 种包含与种族主义或性别歧视相关的研究,该领域的研究似乎呈总体增长趋势。强调系统性压迫的概念性工作与强调内隐偏见和关系框架的实验性工作之间存在明显的不一致。只有三项研究符合 "应用 "或 "实施 "研究的标准,这表明还需要更多的研究来为应用技术的开发和推广提供信息。最后,我们讨论了多个领域的研究现状,并对未来研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior and Social Issues
Behavior and Social Issues PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The primary intellectual framework for Behavior and Social Issues is the science of behavior analysis and its sub-discipline of cultural systems analysis, but contributions from contrasting viewpoints will occasionally be considered if of specific interest to behavior analysts. We recommend that potential authors examine recent issues to determine whether their work is appropriate to the journal. Appropriate contributions include theoretical and conceptual analyses, research articles and brief reports, dialogues, and research reviews. Behavior and Social Issues is an appropriate forum for the work of senior scholars in the field, many of whom serve on the editorial board, as well as for the work of emerging scholars, including students, who have an interest in the contributions of a natural science of behavior to constructing cultures of social justice, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Needle Phobia Treatments for Participants with Neurodevelopmental Disorders A Behavioral Systems Approach to a Brazilian Restorative Justice Organization Reducing Racial Bias Using a Conflicting Relations Paradigm: A Systematic Replication of Mizael et al. (2016) Addressing Racism in Behavioral Sciences: Recent Insights in the Experimental Analysis of Fairness and Inequity Aversion Student Perceptions of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Related to Racism in Behavior-Analytic Graduate Training Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1