A Tale of Two Comprehensions? Analyzing Student Programmer Attention during Code Summarization

IF 6.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1145/3664808
Zachary Karas, Aakash Bansal, Yifan Zhang, Toby Li, Collin McMillan, Yu Huang
{"title":"A Tale of Two Comprehensions? Analyzing Student Programmer Attention during Code Summarization","authors":"Zachary Karas, Aakash Bansal, Yifan Zhang, Toby Li, Collin McMillan, Yu Huang","doi":"10.1145/3664808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Code summarization is the task of creating short, natural language descriptions of source code. It is an important part of code comprehension, and a powerful method of documentation. Previous work has made progress in identifying where programmers focus in code as they write their own summaries (i.e. writing). However, there is currently a gap studying programmers’ attention as they read code with pre-written summaries (i.e., reading). As a result, it is currently unknown how these two forms of code comprehension compare: reading and writing. Also, there is a limited understanding of programmer attention in code summarization with respect to program semantics. We address these gaps in this paper with a human eye-tracking study (n = 27) comparing reading and writing. We examined programmer attention with respect to fine-grained program semantics, including their attention sequence (i.e., scan path). We find distinctions in programmer attention between the comprehension tasks, similarities in reading patterns between them, and differences mediated by expertise. Furthermore, we mapped programmers’ gaze data onto the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) to explore another representation of human attention. Some significant differences in programmer attention on the raw code are not significant on the AST, while others are more significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50933,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3664808","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Code summarization is the task of creating short, natural language descriptions of source code. It is an important part of code comprehension, and a powerful method of documentation. Previous work has made progress in identifying where programmers focus in code as they write their own summaries (i.e. writing). However, there is currently a gap studying programmers’ attention as they read code with pre-written summaries (i.e., reading). As a result, it is currently unknown how these two forms of code comprehension compare: reading and writing. Also, there is a limited understanding of programmer attention in code summarization with respect to program semantics. We address these gaps in this paper with a human eye-tracking study (n = 27) comparing reading and writing. We examined programmer attention with respect to fine-grained program semantics, including their attention sequence (i.e., scan path). We find distinctions in programmer attention between the comprehension tasks, similarities in reading patterns between them, and differences mediated by expertise. Furthermore, we mapped programmers’ gaze data onto the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) to explore another representation of human attention. Some significant differences in programmer attention on the raw code are not significant on the AST, while others are more significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种理解的故事?分析学生程序员在总结代码时的注意力
代码摘要是为源代码创建简短的自然语言描述的任务。它是代码理解的重要组成部分,也是一种强大的文档编制方法。以前的工作在确定程序员在编写自己的摘要(即写作)时的代码重点方面取得了进展。然而,目前在研究程序员阅读预先写好摘要的代码(即阅读)时的注意力方面还存在空白。因此,目前还不清楚阅读和书写这两种代码理解方式的比较情况。此外,人们对程序员在总结代码时关注程序语义的理解也很有限。我们在本文中通过一项人类眼动跟踪研究(n = 27)对阅读和写作进行了比较,从而弥补了这些不足。我们考察了程序员在细粒度程序语义方面的注意力,包括他们的注意力顺序(即扫描路径)。我们发现,程序员的注意力在不同的理解任务之间存在差异,他们之间的阅读模式也有相似之处,而且差异还受到专业知识的影响。此外,我们还将程序员的注视数据映射到抽象语法树(AST)上,以探索人类注意力的另一种表现形式。在原始代码上,程序员注意力的一些显著差异在 AST 上并不明显,而其他一些差异则更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
164
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. TOSEM also reports on successful efforts, noting practical lessons that can be scaled and transferred to other projects, and often looks at applications of innovative technologies. The tone is scholarly but readable; the content is worthy of study; the presentation is effective.
期刊最新文献
Effective, Platform-Independent GUI Testing via Image Embedding and Reinforcement Learning Bitmap-Based Security Monitoring for Deeply Embedded Systems Harmonising Contributions: Exploring Diversity in Software Engineering through CQA Mining on Stack Overflow An Empirical Study on the Characteristics of Database Access Bugs in Java Applications Self-planning Code Generation with Large Language Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1