Optimal policies for nutrition administration to very low birth weight infants

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT DECISION SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1111/deci.12629
Irem Sengul Orgut, Gustave H. Falciglia, Karen Smilowitz
{"title":"Optimal policies for nutrition administration to very low birth weight infants","authors":"Irem Sengul Orgut, Gustave H. Falciglia, Karen Smilowitz","doi":"10.1111/deci.12629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (birth weight 1500 grams) are at risk of postnatal growth restriction. Understanding how nutrition is associated with growth and how these associations vary based on infant characteristics and comorbidities is important to reduce postnatal growth restriction. We propose a three‐step analytical framework: (i) We use unsupervised Clustering techniques to identify subgroups within a cohort of VLBW infants based on infant characteristics, diagnoses, and treatments. (ii) For each cluster, we use Multilevel Modeling to explore the associations between calorie or protein intake and growth velocity (GV) for varying time windows. (iii) We build Mixed‐Integer Programming Models to achieve simple rule‐based policies that physicians can use to classify infants into one of the identified subgroups. We use electronic health records from VLBW infants at Lurie Children's Hospital in Chicago, IL, born between 2011 and 2014. We find that clustering separates infants into two clusters, with Cluster 1 having smaller infants with more comorbidities than Cluster 2. Initial clustering on only sex and birth weight provides results similar to clustering on later‐life diagnoses and treatments. Multilevel models with Clustering provide better model fit than models without clustering. For Cluster 1, there is a significant association between GV and protein but not calories. For Cluster 2, both protein and calories are individually associated with growth. We develop accurate and sparse scoring systems to help clinicians identify infants at higher risk of growth restriction and consider nutrition regimens accordingly.","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (birth weight 1500 grams) are at risk of postnatal growth restriction. Understanding how nutrition is associated with growth and how these associations vary based on infant characteristics and comorbidities is important to reduce postnatal growth restriction. We propose a three‐step analytical framework: (i) We use unsupervised Clustering techniques to identify subgroups within a cohort of VLBW infants based on infant characteristics, diagnoses, and treatments. (ii) For each cluster, we use Multilevel Modeling to explore the associations between calorie or protein intake and growth velocity (GV) for varying time windows. (iii) We build Mixed‐Integer Programming Models to achieve simple rule‐based policies that physicians can use to classify infants into one of the identified subgroups. We use electronic health records from VLBW infants at Lurie Children's Hospital in Chicago, IL, born between 2011 and 2014. We find that clustering separates infants into two clusters, with Cluster 1 having smaller infants with more comorbidities than Cluster 2. Initial clustering on only sex and birth weight provides results similar to clustering on later‐life diagnoses and treatments. Multilevel models with Clustering provide better model fit than models without clustering. For Cluster 1, there is a significant association between GV and protein but not calories. For Cluster 2, both protein and calories are individually associated with growth. We develop accurate and sparse scoring systems to help clinicians identify infants at higher risk of growth restriction and consider nutrition regimens accordingly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极低出生体重儿营养管理的最佳政策
极低出生体重儿(出生体重 1500 克)有产后生长受限的风险。了解营养如何与生长相关联,以及这些关联如何因婴儿特征和合并症而异,对于减少产后生长受限非常重要。我们提出了一个三步分析框架:(i) 我们使用无监督聚类技术,根据婴儿特征、诊断和治疗方法,在低体重儿队列中识别亚群。(ii) 对于每个群组,我们使用多层次建模(Multilevel Modeling)来探索不同时间窗口内卡路里或蛋白质摄入量与生长速度(GV)之间的关联。(iii) 我们建立了混合整数编程模型来实现基于规则的简单策略,医生可利用这些策略将婴儿归入已确定的亚组之一。我们使用了伊利诺伊州芝加哥市 Lurie 儿童医院 2011 年至 2014 年间出生的 VLBW 婴儿的电子健康记录。我们发现,聚类将婴儿分为两个群组,群组 1 中的婴儿比群组 2 中的婴儿更小,合并症更多。仅根据性别和出生体重进行初始聚类的结果与根据后期诊断和治疗进行聚类的结果相似。与无聚类的模型相比,有聚类的多层次模型具有更好的模型拟合效果。对于群组 1,GV 与蛋白质有显著关联,但与卡路里无关。对于聚类 2,蛋白质和卡路里都与生长有单独关联。我们开发了精确而稀疏的评分系统,帮助临床医生识别生长受限风险较高的婴儿,并据此考虑营养方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information In this issue Tax privacy concerns hamper digitization of the nanostore channel In this issue Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1