Replicating the Nordic welfare model: policy prescriptions that recognize the cultural antecedents of solidarity

Amy Lakeman, Michael Jindra
{"title":"Replicating the Nordic welfare model: policy prescriptions that recognize the cultural antecedents of solidarity","authors":"Amy Lakeman, Michael Jindra","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-08-2023-0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In this article, we examine the historical and cultural foundations of Nordic states’ strong contemporary social indicators to understand whether their successes can be replicated in other contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We draw on a range of academic literature to frame a comparison of two regions’ cultural and theological roots, identifying contrasts to make arguments about prescriptions for contemporary welfare policy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>We find Nordic history contributes to a duty-based culture with strong cohesion and social trust. These cultural norms make palatable welfare policies with strong activation measures, while the US model prefers to avoid the latter because of its strong cultural orientation to rights and autonomy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>To mitigate differences between the Nordic states and other cultural contexts, policymakers seeking to replicate Nordic welfare successes should consider welfare programming that combines stronger activation policies with oversight and relational components that mitigate gaps in social cohesion.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>We uniquely bring together the literature on comparative welfare policy and on religion and culture to understand the precursors of contemporary attitudes and their implications for welfare policy prescriptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-08-2023-0192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In this article, we examine the historical and cultural foundations of Nordic states’ strong contemporary social indicators to understand whether their successes can be replicated in other contexts.

Design/methodology/approach

We draw on a range of academic literature to frame a comparison of two regions’ cultural and theological roots, identifying contrasts to make arguments about prescriptions for contemporary welfare policy.

Findings

We find Nordic history contributes to a duty-based culture with strong cohesion and social trust. These cultural norms make palatable welfare policies with strong activation measures, while the US model prefers to avoid the latter because of its strong cultural orientation to rights and autonomy.

Social implications

To mitigate differences between the Nordic states and other cultural contexts, policymakers seeking to replicate Nordic welfare successes should consider welfare programming that combines stronger activation policies with oversight and relational components that mitigate gaps in social cohesion.

Originality/value

We uniquely bring together the literature on comparative welfare policy and on religion and culture to understand the precursors of contemporary attitudes and their implications for welfare policy prescriptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复制北欧福利模式:承认团结的文化基础的政策处方
设计/方法/途径我们借鉴了一系列学术文献,对两个地区的文化和神学渊源进行了比较,找出了其中的对比,从而为当代福利政策的制定提供了依据。为了减少北欧国家与其他文化背景之间的差异,寻求复制北欧福利成功经验的政策制定者应考虑将更有力的激活政策与监督和关系要素相结合,以减少社会凝聚力方面的差距。独创性/价值我们将比较福利政策和宗教与文化方面的文献独特地结合在一起,以了解当代态度的前兆及其对福利政策处方的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
“What do you mean by that?”: solidarity in Canadian development practice Conquerors of poverty – a case study of Colombo slum dwellers Hybrid religious civil society organization, the Israeli case of “the path upwards” lesson learned Relational freedom and the Ilan Pappe case: an anthropological proposal for freedom Give me credit! Microcredit for sustainable development and ethical finance in Rione Sanità, Naples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1