{"title":"A Case of Coronary Artery Perforation Caused by Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Catheterization Laboratory","authors":"Kei Morishita, Takatoshi Unno, Takahiko Murakami, Kensuke Okada, Hiroshi Matsunaga, Kazuo Asada, Yasutoshi Omori, Akiko Ishihara, Yoshiro Kamoi, Takahiro Tanaka","doi":"10.1536/ihj.23-549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for the survival of cardiac arrest patients, but it can cause severe traumatic complications. In the catheterization laboratory, various physical constraints complicate the appropriate performance of CPR. However, we are not aware of reports of CPR complications in this setting. Here, we report a case of coronary artery perforation (CAP) caused by manual CPR in the catheterization laboratory. The patient, a 68-year-old woman, initially underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unstable angina. Back in the ward, the patient experienced acute stent thrombosis, which resulted in cardiac arrest, and another PCI was performed under ongoing manual CPR. Although revascularization was successful, sudden CAP occurred, leading to cardiac tamponade. Despite extensive treatment efforts, the patient died 18 hours later.</p><p>Initially, the compression site of CPR was on the midline of the sternum; however, the compression site shifted to the left, to just above the left anterior descending artery, by the time that CAP was detected via angiography. This corresponded to the area where rib fractures were observed upon computed tomography, suggesting the possibility of traumatic CAP due to manual CPR. The physical constraints in the catheterization laboratory can lead to an inappropriate CPR technique and severe traumatic complications.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.23-549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for the survival of cardiac arrest patients, but it can cause severe traumatic complications. In the catheterization laboratory, various physical constraints complicate the appropriate performance of CPR. However, we are not aware of reports of CPR complications in this setting. Here, we report a case of coronary artery perforation (CAP) caused by manual CPR in the catheterization laboratory. The patient, a 68-year-old woman, initially underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unstable angina. Back in the ward, the patient experienced acute stent thrombosis, which resulted in cardiac arrest, and another PCI was performed under ongoing manual CPR. Although revascularization was successful, sudden CAP occurred, leading to cardiac tamponade. Despite extensive treatment efforts, the patient died 18 hours later.
Initially, the compression site of CPR was on the midline of the sternum; however, the compression site shifted to the left, to just above the left anterior descending artery, by the time that CAP was detected via angiography. This corresponded to the area where rib fractures were observed upon computed tomography, suggesting the possibility of traumatic CAP due to manual CPR. The physical constraints in the catheterization laboratory can lead to an inappropriate CPR technique and severe traumatic complications.
期刊介绍:
Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.