Diving waves in acoustic factorized orthorhombic media

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Prospecting Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1111/1365-2478.13532
Kristoffer Tesdal Galtung, Alexey Stovas
{"title":"Diving waves in acoustic factorized orthorhombic media","authors":"Kristoffer Tesdal Galtung,&nbsp;Alexey Stovas","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Diving waves propagating in the subsurface are massive sources of low-frequency information that can be used to constrain the kinematic component of the velocity model. Compared to reflected waves, less is known about the behaviour of diving waves, especially in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy. Anisotropy is needed to place the events to the correct depths and match travel times in synthetics with recorded data. Obtaining more insights into the influence of anisotropy on diving wave propagation can help to find parameters with a low trade-off for inversion. Here, we derive equations for diving qP-waves in an acoustic factorized anisotropic model with orthorhombic anisotropy. The effects of the anisotropic parameters in the acoustic factorized orthorhombic model are tested by perturbing <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>ε</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\epsilon _1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>ε</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\epsilon _2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\eta _1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\eta _2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\eta _3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and observing differences in the ray paths, the effective vertical slowness and the relative geometrical spreading. The properties of diving waves in this model are also compared with those in an acoustic isotropic model and acoustic factorized anisotropic models with elliptical- and vertical transverse isotropic anisotropy. From our analysis, we found that perturbing <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>ε</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\epsilon _1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>ε</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\epsilon _2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> has the most significant influence on these characteristics. The <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\eta _1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\eta _2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\eta _3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> parameters were shown to induce minor changes. Compared with the other models, the acoustic factorized orthorhombic model had the most in common with the acoustic factorized anisotropic model with elliptical anisotropy. Although, in general, none of the other models could fully represent the effects of orthorhombic anisotropy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diving waves propagating in the subsurface are massive sources of low-frequency information that can be used to constrain the kinematic component of the velocity model. Compared to reflected waves, less is known about the behaviour of diving waves, especially in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy. Anisotropy is needed to place the events to the correct depths and match travel times in synthetics with recorded data. Obtaining more insights into the influence of anisotropy on diving wave propagation can help to find parameters with a low trade-off for inversion. Here, we derive equations for diving qP-waves in an acoustic factorized anisotropic model with orthorhombic anisotropy. The effects of the anisotropic parameters in the acoustic factorized orthorhombic model are tested by perturbing ε 1 $\epsilon _1$ , ε 2 $\epsilon _2$ , η 1 $\eta _1$ , η 2 $\eta _2$ and η 3 $\eta _3$ and observing differences in the ray paths, the effective vertical slowness and the relative geometrical spreading. The properties of diving waves in this model are also compared with those in an acoustic isotropic model and acoustic factorized anisotropic models with elliptical- and vertical transverse isotropic anisotropy. From our analysis, we found that perturbing ε 1 $\epsilon _1$ and ε 2 $\epsilon _2$ has the most significant influence on these characteristics. The η 1 $\eta _1$ , η 2 $\eta _2$ and η 3 $\eta _3$ parameters were shown to induce minor changes. Compared with the other models, the acoustic factorized orthorhombic model had the most in common with the acoustic factorized anisotropic model with elliptical anisotropy. Although, in general, none of the other models could fully represent the effects of orthorhombic anisotropy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声因式正交介质中的潜水波
在地下传播的潜波是低频信息的巨大来源,可用来约束速度模型的运动分量。与反射波相比,人们对潜水波的行为了解较少,尤其是在存在方位各向异性的情况下。各向异性是将事件置于正确深度的必要条件,也是使合成波的传播时间与记录数据相匹配的必要条件。更深入地了解各向异性对潜水波传播的影响,有助于找到反演权衡较低的参数。在这里,我们推导了具有正交各向异性的声学因子化各向异性模型中的下潜 qP 波方程。通过扰动 、 、 和 ,测试了各向异性参数在声学因式正交模型中的影响,并观察了射线路径、有效垂直慢度和相对几何展宽的差异。我们还将该模型中的潜水波特性与声学各向同性模型以及具有椭圆和垂直横向各向异性的声学因式各向异性模型进行了比较。通过分析,我们发现扰动 和 对这些特性的影响最为显著。而 、 和 参数的变化较小。与其他模型相比,声学因式正交模型与椭圆各向异性声学因式各向异性模型的共同点最多。尽管总的来说,其他模型都不能完全代表正交各向异性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Simultaneous inversion of four physical parameters of hydrate reservoir for high accuracy porosity estimation A mollifier approach to seismic data representation Analytic solutions for effective elastic moduli of isotropic solids containing oblate spheroid pores with critical porosity An efficient pseudoelastic pure P-mode wave equation and the implementation of the free surface boundary condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1