Making sense of experiential education in Canada: the four lenses of faculty sensemaking

IF 3.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s10734-024-01238-6
Emerson LaCroix
{"title":"Making sense of experiential education in Canada: the four lenses of faculty sensemaking","authors":"Emerson LaCroix","doi":"10.1007/s10734-024-01238-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Discussions about experiential education abound in the Canadian higher education sector, as well as more broadly across the international landscape. In Canada, experiential learning opportunities are increasingly embedded within institutional mission statements, administrative priorities, and pedagogical frameworks. Despite its spread, research has tended to overlook faculty perspectives, including how they make sense of experiential education and its impact on their professional roles or disciplinary priorities. To shore up these gaps, this article reports the findings from in-depth semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 47) with faculty members across eight disciplines from six universities. Drawing on international literature on experiential education and organizational sensemaking, the findings of this study reveal four sensemaking lenses that faculty use to make sense of experiential learning: the disciplinary lens, the institutional lens, the pedagogical lens, and the professional lens. Both collectively and individually, these lenses have implications for the successful institutionalization of experiential education, as they are the frames through which faculty form meaning and enact their responses. By distinguishing these lenses, this article reinforces sensemaking as a process of bricolage and that faculty draw on multiple lenses to understand organizational changes. The article concludes with recommendations for future research on faculty sensemaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":48383,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01238-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discussions about experiential education abound in the Canadian higher education sector, as well as more broadly across the international landscape. In Canada, experiential learning opportunities are increasingly embedded within institutional mission statements, administrative priorities, and pedagogical frameworks. Despite its spread, research has tended to overlook faculty perspectives, including how they make sense of experiential education and its impact on their professional roles or disciplinary priorities. To shore up these gaps, this article reports the findings from in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 47) with faculty members across eight disciplines from six universities. Drawing on international literature on experiential education and organizational sensemaking, the findings of this study reveal four sensemaking lenses that faculty use to make sense of experiential learning: the disciplinary lens, the institutional lens, the pedagogical lens, and the professional lens. Both collectively and individually, these lenses have implications for the successful institutionalization of experiential education, as they are the frames through which faculty form meaning and enact their responses. By distinguishing these lenses, this article reinforces sensemaking as a process of bricolage and that faculty draw on multiple lenses to understand organizational changes. The article concludes with recommendations for future research on faculty sensemaking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大体验教育的意义:教师感性认识的四个视角
关于体验式教育的讨论在加拿大高等教育界比比皆是,在国际范围内也是如此。在加拿大,体验式学习的机会越来越多地被纳入院校的使命宣言、行政优先事项和教学框架之中。尽管体验式教育十分普及,但相关研究往往忽视了教师的观点,包括他们如何理解体验式教育,以及体验式教育对他们的职业角色或学科优先事项的影响。为了弥补这些不足,本文报告了对六所大学八个学科的教师进行的半结构式深度访谈(n = 47)的结果。借鉴有关体验式教育和组织感性认识的国际文献,本研究的结果揭示了教师用来理解体验式学习的四个感性认识视角:学科视角、机构视角、教学视角和专业视角。这些视角无论是作为整体还是个体,都对体验式教育的成功制度化具有影响,因为它们是教师形成意义和做出反应的框架。通过对这些视角的区分,本文强调了感性认识是一个创造的过程,教员们需要借助多种视角来理解组织变革。文章最后对未来的教职员工感性认识研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education
Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Higher Education is recognised as the leading international journal of Higher Education studies, publishing twelve separate numbers each year. Since its establishment in 1972, Higher Education has followed educational developments throughout the world in universities, polytechnics, colleges, and vocational and education institutions. It has actively endeavoured to report on developments in both public and private Higher Education sectors. Contributions have come from leading scholars from different countries while articles have tackled the problems of teachers as well as students, and of planners as well as administrators. While each Higher Education system has its own distinctive features, common problems and issues are shared internationally by researchers, teachers and institutional leaders. Higher Education offers opportunities for exchange of research results, experience and insights, and provides a forum for ongoing discussion between experts. Higher Education publishes authoritative overview articles, comparative studies and analyses of particular problems or issues. All contributions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
“Writing for English-medium publication is a journey to nowhere — no route and no tools”: Russian academics’ perceptions of the existing publication support The enigma of collegiality: collegiality frames and institutional logics in US higher education Navigating public goods: Chilean public universities and their transformative role in Latin America Exploring perceptions of public good(s), government, and global contributions in Japanese higher education: a phenomenographic approach The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1