Attitudes of cardiac rehabilitation and stroke teams towards integration of stroke survivors into adapted cardiac rehabilitation: A focus group study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1177/02692155241253476
Nicola Clague-Baker, Thompson Robinson, Annegret Hagenberg, Sophie Drewry, Sally Singh
{"title":"Attitudes of cardiac rehabilitation and stroke teams towards integration of stroke survivors into adapted cardiac rehabilitation: A focus group study.","authors":"Nicola Clague-Baker, Thompson Robinson, Annegret Hagenberg, Sophie Drewry, Sally Singh","doi":"10.1177/02692155241253476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the attitudes and beliefs of cardiac rehabilitation and stroke teams towards adapted cardiac rehabilitation, and the broader topics of exercise, healthy lifestyles and health behaviour change, for people with mild-to-moderate severity stroke in the sub-acute phase of recovery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative focus group-based study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute and community national health service trusts.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Stroke and cardiac rehabilitation team members.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Adapted cardiac rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Focus groups. Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 57 health professionals participated in 12 focus groups. Positive impacts for teams and stroke survivors were identified particularly confidence. However, there were negatives, barriers and adaptations identified. In addition, there was a lack of knowledge for cardiac rehabilitation teams in relation to stroke survivors and stroke teams in relation to cardiac rehabilitation, exercise and healthy lifestyles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation and stroke staff attitudes to cardiac rehabilitation for stroke survivors showed a range of benefits, negatives, barriers and adaptations needed. Confidence and knowledge of the cardiac rehabilitation and stroke teams needs to be addressed.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ISRCTN65957980.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1264-1275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241253476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the attitudes and beliefs of cardiac rehabilitation and stroke teams towards adapted cardiac rehabilitation, and the broader topics of exercise, healthy lifestyles and health behaviour change, for people with mild-to-moderate severity stroke in the sub-acute phase of recovery.

Design: Qualitative focus group-based study.

Setting: Acute and community national health service trusts.

Participants: Stroke and cardiac rehabilitation team members.

Intervention: Adapted cardiac rehabilitation.

Main measures: Focus groups. Thematic analysis was applied to the transcribed data.

Results: Overall, 57 health professionals participated in 12 focus groups. Positive impacts for teams and stroke survivors were identified particularly confidence. However, there were negatives, barriers and adaptations identified. In addition, there was a lack of knowledge for cardiac rehabilitation teams in relation to stroke survivors and stroke teams in relation to cardiac rehabilitation, exercise and healthy lifestyles.

Conclusions: Cardiac rehabilitation and stroke staff attitudes to cardiac rehabilitation for stroke survivors showed a range of benefits, negatives, barriers and adaptations needed. Confidence and knowledge of the cardiac rehabilitation and stroke teams needs to be addressed.

Registration: ISRCTN65957980.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏康复团队和脑卒中团队对脑卒中幸存者融入适应性心脏康复的态度:焦点小组研究。
目的探讨心脏康复团队和脑卒中团队对轻度至中度脑卒中患者在亚急性康复阶段的适应性心脏康复以及运动、健康生活方式和健康行为改变等更广泛主题的态度和信念:设计:基于焦点小组的定性研究:参与者:卒中和心脏康复团队成员参与者:卒中和心脏康复团队成员:主要措施:焦点小组:主要措施:焦点小组。对转录数据进行主题分析:共有 57 名医疗专业人员参加了 12 个焦点小组。发现了对团队和中风幸存者的积极影响,尤其是信心。然而,也发现了一些负面影响、障碍和调整。此外,心脏康复团队对中风幸存者以及中风团队对心脏康复、运动和健康生活方式缺乏了解:结论:心脏康复和脑卒中工作人员对脑卒中幸存者进行心脏康复的态度显示了一系列的益处、负面影响、障碍和所需的调整。心脏康复和中风团队的信心和知识问题需要解决:ISRCTN65957980。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1