Zefei Jiang, Jianbin Li, Jiayi Chen, Yueping Liu, Kun Wang, Jianyun Nie, Xiaojia Wang, Chunfang Hao, Yongmei Yin, Shusen Wang, Min Yan, Tao Wang, Ying Yan, Xiaoyuan Chen, Erwei Song
{"title":"Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022.","authors":"Zefei Jiang, Jianbin Li, Jiayi Chen, Yueping Liu, Kun Wang, Jianyun Nie, Xiaojia Wang, Chunfang Hao, Yongmei Yin, Shusen Wang, Min Yan, Tao Wang, Ying Yan, Xiaoyuan Chen, Erwei Song","doi":"10.21037/tbcr-22-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). In recent years, the availability of medical resources has become a major concern in clinical guidelines, which is particularly important for developing countries or socioeconomically diverse countries and territories. China is the world's largest developing country, with a large territory and uneven economic and academic developments. The CSCO guidelines must take into account the differences in regional development, the availability of medicines and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer treatment. Therefore, for each clinical problem and intervention in the CSCO guidelines, the levels of evidence should be graded according to the currently available evidences and expert consensuses, and the grades of recommendations should be based on the availability and cost-effectiveness of the products. Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO experts, the CSCO guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. The CSCO Guidance Working Group firmly believes that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice. Again, any comments from our readers are greatly appreciated and will be considered in updates of these guidelines, so as to maintain the accuracy, fairness, and timeliness of the CSCO guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":101427,"journal":{"name":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","volume":"3 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-22-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). In recent years, the availability of medical resources has become a major concern in clinical guidelines, which is particularly important for developing countries or socioeconomically diverse countries and territories. China is the world's largest developing country, with a large territory and uneven economic and academic developments. The CSCO guidelines must take into account the differences in regional development, the availability of medicines and diagnostic methods, and the social value of cancer treatment. Therefore, for each clinical problem and intervention in the CSCO guidelines, the levels of evidence should be graded according to the currently available evidences and expert consensuses, and the grades of recommendations should be based on the availability and cost-effectiveness of the products. Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO experts, the CSCO guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. The CSCO Guidance Working Group firmly believes that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice. Again, any comments from our readers are greatly appreciated and will be considered in updates of these guidelines, so as to maintain the accuracy, fairness, and timeliness of the CSCO guidelines.
中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)的基本任务之一是根据循证医学实践、诊疗产品的可获得性和精准医学的最新进展,制定中国常见癌症的诊疗指南。近年来,医疗资源的可获得性已成为临床指南的主要关注点,这对于发展中国家或社会经济多元化的国家和地区尤为重要。中国是世界上最大的发展中国家,幅员辽阔,经济和学术发展不平衡。CSCO 指南必须考虑到地区发展的差异、药品和诊断方法的可获得性以及癌症治疗的社会价值。因此,对于 CSCO 指南中的每个临床问题和干预措施,应根据现有证据和专家共识划分证据等级,并根据产品的可用性和成本效益划分推荐等级。证据水平高且可获得性好的方案作为 I 级建议;证据水平相对较高但专家共识略低或可获得性差的方案作为 II 级建议;临床适用但证据水平低的方案作为 III 级建议。CSCO指南根据国内外临床研究的结果和CSCO专家的意见,确定临床应用的推荐级别。CSCO 指南工作组坚信,以证据为基础、以可用性为关注点、以共识为基础的指南在临床实践中将更具可行性。我们再次感谢读者的任何意见,并将在更新这些指南时予以考虑,以保持 CSCO 指南的准确性、公平性和及时性。