The association of vaccination status with perceived discrimination in patients with COVID-19: results from a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.57187/s.3634
Christoph Becker, Katharina Beck, Céline Moser, Clara Lessing, Armon Arpagaus, Sebastian Gross, Tabita Urben, Rainer Schaefert, Simon Amacher, Stefano Bassetti, Philipp Schuetz, Sabina Hunziker
{"title":"The association of vaccination status with perceived discrimination in patients with COVID-19: results from a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Christoph Becker, Katharina Beck, Céline Moser, Clara Lessing, Armon Arpagaus, Sebastian Gross, Tabita Urben, Rainer Schaefert, Simon Amacher, Stefano Bassetti, Philipp Schuetz, Sabina Hunziker","doi":"10.57187/s.3634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aims: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was increasing pressure to be vaccinated to prevent further spread of the virus and improve outcomes. At the same time, part of the population expressed reluctance to vaccination, for various reasons. Only a few studies have compared the perceptions of vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients being treated in hospitals for COVID-19. Our aim was to investigate the association between vaccination status and perceived healthcare-associated discrimination in patients with COVID-19 receiving hospital treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients presenting to the emergency department or hospitalised for inpatient care due to or with COVID-19 from 1 June to 31 December 2021 in two Swiss hospitals were eligible. The primary endpoint was patients' perceived healthcare-associated discrimination, measured with the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) scale. Secondary endpoints included different aspects of perceived quality of care and symptoms of psychological distress measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-vaccinated patients (n = 113) had significantly higher DMS scores compared to vaccinated patients (n = 80) (mean: 9.54 points [SD: 4.84] vs 7.79 points [SD: 1.85]; adjusted difference: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.04-2.33 points]) and 21 of 80 vaccinated patients felt discriminated against vs 54 of 113 non-vaccinated patients (adjusted OR: 2.09 [95% CI: 1.10-3.99 ]). Non-vaccinated patients reported lower scores regarding respectful treatment by the nursing team (mean: 8.39 points [SD: 2.39] vs 9.30 points [SD: 1.09]; adjusted difference: -0.6 [95% CI: -1.18 - -0.02 points]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found an association between vaccination status and perceived healthcare-associated discrimination. Healthcare workers should act in a professional manner regardless of a patient's vaccination status; in doing so, they might prevent the creation of negative perceptions in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"154 ","pages":"3634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study aims: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was increasing pressure to be vaccinated to prevent further spread of the virus and improve outcomes. At the same time, part of the population expressed reluctance to vaccination, for various reasons. Only a few studies have compared the perceptions of vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients being treated in hospitals for COVID-19. Our aim was to investigate the association between vaccination status and perceived healthcare-associated discrimination in patients with COVID-19 receiving hospital treatment.

Methods: Adult patients presenting to the emergency department or hospitalised for inpatient care due to or with COVID-19 from 1 June to 31 December 2021 in two Swiss hospitals were eligible. The primary endpoint was patients' perceived healthcare-associated discrimination, measured with the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) scale. Secondary endpoints included different aspects of perceived quality of care and symptoms of psychological distress measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results: Non-vaccinated patients (n = 113) had significantly higher DMS scores compared to vaccinated patients (n = 80) (mean: 9.54 points [SD: 4.84] vs 7.79 points [SD: 1.85]; adjusted difference: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.04-2.33 points]) and 21 of 80 vaccinated patients felt discriminated against vs 54 of 113 non-vaccinated patients (adjusted OR: 2.09 [95% CI: 1.10-3.99 ]). Non-vaccinated patients reported lower scores regarding respectful treatment by the nursing team (mean: 8.39 points [SD: 2.39] vs 9.30 points [SD: 1.09]; adjusted difference: -0.6 [95% CI: -1.18 - -0.02 points]).

Conclusion: We found an association between vaccination status and perceived healthcare-associated discrimination. Healthcare workers should act in a professional manner regardless of a patient's vaccination status; in doing so, they might prevent the creation of negative perceptions in patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫苗接种情况与 COVID-19 患者感知到的歧视之间的关系:一项横断面研究的结果。
研究目的在 COVID-19 大流行期间,接种疫苗以防止病毒进一步传播并改善治疗效果的压力越来越大。与此同时,部分人群出于各种原因表示不愿接种疫苗。只有少数研究比较了在医院接受 COVID-19 治疗的已接种和未接种患者的看法。我们的目的是调查接受医院治疗的 COVID-19 患者的疫苗接种情况与感知到的医疗相关歧视之间的关联:方法:2021 年 6 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,在瑞士两家医院因 COVID-19 或感染 COVID-19 而到急诊科就诊或住院治疗的成人患者均符合条件。主要终点是患者感知到的医疗相关歧视,采用医疗环境歧视(DMS)量表进行测量。次要终点包括医疗质量感知的不同方面以及医院焦虑和抑郁量表测量的心理困扰症状:结果:与接种疫苗的患者(80 人)相比,未接种疫苗的患者(113 人)的 DMS 评分明显更高(平均值为 9.54 分[标度:4 分]):9.54 分 [SD: 4.84] vs 7.79 分 [SD: 1.85];调整后差异为 1.18 [95% CI] :80名接种疫苗的患者中有21名感到受到歧视,而113名未接种疫苗的患者中有54名感到受到歧视(调整后OR:2.09 [95% CI:1.10-3.99])。未接种疫苗的患者在护理团队的尊重方面得分较低(平均:8.39 分[标度:2]):平均值:8.39 分 [SD: 2.39] vs 9.30 分 [SD: 1.09];调整后差异:-0.6 [95% CI: 1.10-3.99]:-结论:我们发现疫苗接种情况与感知到的医疗相关歧视之间存在关联。无论患者的疫苗接种情况如何,医护人员都应以专业的态度行事;这样做可以防止患者产生负面看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
期刊最新文献
Supplementum 284: Abstracts of the 56th Annual meeting of the Swiss Society of Nephrology. Safety of oral immunotherapy for cashew nut and peanut allergy in children - a retrospective single-centre study. Cardiac amyloidosis. Blood pressure control and antihypertensive treatment in Swiss general practice: a cross-sectional study using routine data. Exploring the real-world management of catheter-associated urinary tract infections by Swiss general practitioners and urologists: insights from an online survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1