P-CAB versus PPI in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241241223
Yutong Jiang, Rongrong Zhang, Yuxuan Fang, Ruixia Zhao, Yu Fu, Pingping Ren, Qingqing Zhan, Mingyi Shao
{"title":"P-CAB <i>versus</i> PPI in the eradication of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yutong Jiang, Rongrong Zhang, Yuxuan Fang, Ruixia Zhao, Yu Fu, Pingping Ren, Qingqing Zhan, Mingyi Shao","doi":"10.1177/17562848241241223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the eradication of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (Hp) remains controversial when compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study set out to compare the differences in the eradication rate and adverse reactions between eradication regimens based on P-CAB or PPI drugs and the differences between the vonoprazan-based and the tegoprazan-based regimens to explore the efficacy and safety of different Hp eradication regimens.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WOS were searched from the inception of these databases up to July 2023, and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The outcome measures were the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of different regimens in treating Hp. The results were estimated as relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and R 4.2.1 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis (NMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis, involving 5815 patients with Hp. In terms of eradication rate, the 2-week vonoprazan-based triple regimen (V-Tri-2w) was the best, which was superior to the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 0.9, 95% CI: (0.85-0.95)] and the 1-week tegoprazan-based triple regimen [T-Tri-1w, RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.64-0.97)]; the 2-week tegoprazan-based quadruple regimen (T-Qua-2w) was superior to the 1-week PPI-based triple regimen [P-Tri-1w, RR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.67-0.99)], and there was no difference between the remaining tegoprazan-based regimens and the PPI-based or vonoprazan-based regimens. In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the 2-week vonoprazan-based binary regimen (V-Bi-2w) was lower than that of the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.57-2.52)]; there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 weeks for each regimen, such as the vonoprazan-based triple regimen [RR = 1.11, 95% CI: (0.82-1.52)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the eradication treatment of Hp, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens are generally better than those of PPI-based regimens. Among them, the V-Tri-2w regimen has the highest eradication rate and may be the preferred choice for Hp eradication.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241241223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) remains controversial when compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

Objectives: The current study set out to compare the differences in the eradication rate and adverse reactions between eradication regimens based on P-CAB or PPI drugs and the differences between the vonoprazan-based and the tegoprazan-based regimens to explore the efficacy and safety of different Hp eradication regimens.

Data sources and methods: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WOS were searched from the inception of these databases up to July 2023, and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The outcome measures were the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of different regimens in treating Hp. The results were estimated as relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and R 4.2.1 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis (NMA).

Results: A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis, involving 5815 patients with Hp. In terms of eradication rate, the 2-week vonoprazan-based triple regimen (V-Tri-2w) was the best, which was superior to the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 0.9, 95% CI: (0.85-0.95)] and the 1-week tegoprazan-based triple regimen [T-Tri-1w, RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.64-0.97)]; the 2-week tegoprazan-based quadruple regimen (T-Qua-2w) was superior to the 1-week PPI-based triple regimen [P-Tri-1w, RR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.67-0.99)], and there was no difference between the remaining tegoprazan-based regimens and the PPI-based or vonoprazan-based regimens. In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the 2-week vonoprazan-based binary regimen (V-Bi-2w) was lower than that of the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.57-2.52)]; there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 weeks for each regimen, such as the vonoprazan-based triple regimen [RR = 1.11, 95% CI: (0.82-1.52)].

Conclusion: In the eradication treatment of Hp, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens are generally better than those of PPI-based regimens. Among them, the V-Tri-2w regimen has the highest eradication rate and may be the preferred choice for Hp eradication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P-CAB 与 PPI 在根除幽门螺旋杆菌方面的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)相比,钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)在根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)方面的疗效和安全性仍存在争议:本研究旨在比较基于P-CAB或PPI药物的根除方案在根除率和不良反应方面的差异,以及基于vonoprazan和基于tegoprazan的方案之间的差异,以探讨不同Hp根除方案的有效性和安全性:检索了从 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 WOS 等数据库建立之初到 2023 年 7 月的所有资料,并纳入了符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究结果的衡量标准是不同方案治疗肝炎的根除率和不良反应发生率。结果以相对风险(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)估算,并使用R 4.2.1软件进行网络荟萃分析(NMA):共有20项研究被纳入分析,涉及5815名Hp患者。在根除率方面,以2周vonoprazan为基础的三联方案(V-Tri-2w)最好,优于以2周PPI为基础的四联方案[P-Qua-2w,RR = 0.9,95% CI:(0.85-0.95)]和以1周tegoprazan为基础的三联方案[T-Tri-1w,RR = 0.79,95% CI:(0.64-0.97)];基于替戈普拉赞的2周四联方案(T-Qua-2w)优于基于PPI的1周三联方案[P-Tri-1w,RR = 0.82,95% CI:(0.67-0.99)],其余基于替戈普拉赞的方案与基于PPI或vonoprazan的方案之间没有差异。在不良反应发生率方面,以vonoprazan为基础的2周二联方案(V-Bi-2w)低于以PPI为基础的2周四联方案[P-Qua-2w,RR = 1.98,95% CI:(1.57-2.52)];各方案1周和2周之间无显著差异,如以vonoprazan为基础的三联方案[RR = 1.11,95% CI:(0.82-1.52)]:结论:在根除 Hp 的治疗中,以 vonoprazan 为基础的方案的疗效和安全性普遍优于以 PPI 为基础的方案。其中,V-Tri-2w 方案的根除率最高,可作为根除 Hp 的首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1