Health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in knowledge management: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1111/jan.16237
Eevi Karsikas, Merja Meriläinen, Kirsi Koivunen, Outi Kanste
{"title":"Health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in knowledge management: A descriptive cross-sectional study.","authors":"Eevi Karsikas, Merja Meriläinen, Kirsi Koivunen, Outi Kanste","doi":"10.1111/jan.16237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in knowledge management and the factors associated with management competence.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been shown that the performance of an organization is as good as the competence of its managers, so health and social care managers' competence in knowledge management should be assessed to improve organizational performance.</p><p><strong>Desgin: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 116 managers participated from six Finnish public health and social care organizations. The data were collected in February and August 2022 using the managers' competence in knowledge management (MCKM) instrument and analysed using descriptive statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health and social care managers rated their self-reported total competence in knowledge management as good. Among the dimensions of knowledge management competence, managing a culture of competence received the highest rating, while planning competence development and cooperation was perceived as the weakest dimension. The results indicate that background factors such as the healthcare setting, the number of units managed and the number of direct staff had a statistically significant association with the health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in planning competence development and cooperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the health and social care managers' total self-assessed competence level in knowledge management was rated as good, the results underscore the significance of continuous competence development among these managers in all dimensions of knowledge management.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>By enhancing and clarifying managers' tasks and competence in knowledge management, managers can increase staff retention, attractiveness and work well-being.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The results can be utilized to identify managers' strengths and weaknesses in knowledge management and, thus, effectively target their limited competence development resources.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>There is no patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"787-797"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To describe health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in knowledge management and the factors associated with management competence.

Background: It has been shown that the performance of an organization is as good as the competence of its managers, so health and social care managers' competence in knowledge management should be assessed to improve organizational performance.

Desgin: A descriptive cross-sectional design.

Methods: A total of 116 managers participated from six Finnish public health and social care organizations. The data were collected in February and August 2022 using the managers' competence in knowledge management (MCKM) instrument and analysed using descriptive statistical methods.

Results: Health and social care managers rated their self-reported total competence in knowledge management as good. Among the dimensions of knowledge management competence, managing a culture of competence received the highest rating, while planning competence development and cooperation was perceived as the weakest dimension. The results indicate that background factors such as the healthcare setting, the number of units managed and the number of direct staff had a statistically significant association with the health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in planning competence development and cooperation.

Conclusion: Even though the health and social care managers' total self-assessed competence level in knowledge management was rated as good, the results underscore the significance of continuous competence development among these managers in all dimensions of knowledge management.

Impact: By enhancing and clarifying managers' tasks and competence in knowledge management, managers can increase staff retention, attractiveness and work well-being.

Implications: The results can be utilized to identify managers' strengths and weaknesses in knowledge management and, thus, effectively target their limited competence development resources.

Reporting method: The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.

Patient or public contribution: There is no patient or public contribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生和社会保健管理人员对知识管理能力的自我评估:一项描述性横断面研究。
目的:描述卫生和社会保健管理人员自我评估的知识管理能力以及与管理能力相关的因素:背景:有研究表明,一个组织的绩效与其管理者的能力息息相关,因此应评估卫生和社会护理管理者在知识管理方面的能力,以提高组织绩效:设计:描述性横断面设计:方法:共有 116 名来自芬兰 6 家公共医疗和社会医疗机构的管理人员参与了研究。数据收集于 2022 年 2 月和 8 月,使用了管理人员知识管理能力(MCKM)工具,并使用描述性统计方法进行了分析:结果:卫生和社会医疗机构的管理人员将其自我报告的知识管理总能力评为 "良好"。在知识管理能力的各个维度中,管理能力文化得到的评价最高,而规划能力发展与合作被认为是最弱的维度。结果表明,医疗环境、管理单位数量和直接员工数量等背景因素与医疗和社会护理管理者在规划能力发展与合作方面的自我评估能力有显著的统计学关联:结论:尽管医疗和社会护理管理者在知识管理方面的自我评估能力总水平被评为良好,但结果强调了这些管理者在知识管理所有方面持续能力发展的重要性:影响:通过加强和明确管理人员在知识管理方面的任务和能力,管理人员可以提高员工留任率、吸引力和工作幸福感:结果可用于确定管理人员在知识管理方面的强项和弱项,从而有效利用有限的能力发展资源:患者或公众贡献:没有患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
The role of evidence-based practice and empathy in shared decision-making attitudes among newly graduated nurses: A cross-sectional study. Health and social care managers' self-assessed competence in knowledge management: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Trajectory patterns and influencing factors of supportive care needs in stroke patients: A longitudinal study. Prevalence and factors associated with medication administration errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: A multicentre, nationwide direct observational study. Desiring support on a winding road with challenging intersections: Social and professional support for sexual minority forced migrant men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1