Examining Adolescent Language Performance in Discourse Production Across Four Elicitation Tasks.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00163
Adele K Wallis, Marleen F Westerveld
{"title":"Examining Adolescent Language Performance in Discourse Production Across Four Elicitation Tasks.","authors":"Adele K Wallis, Marleen F Westerveld","doi":"10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Comprehensive spoken language assessment should include the evaluation of language use in naturalistic contexts. Discourse elicitation and analysis provides the opportunity for such an evaluation to occur. In this article, our overall aim was to describe adolescents' language performance on four elicitation tasks and determine if there are task-related differences across the elicitation tasks.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-four typically developing adolescents with ages ranging from 12;2 to 17;11 (years;months; <i>M =</i> 15;2; 21 boys and 23 girls) participated in the study. They completed four spoken discourse tasks: (a) story generation using a wordless picture book, (b) fable retell, (c) six personal narratives in response to emotion-based prompts, and (d) monologic response to two stories that contained a moral dilemma. Responses were transcribed and analyzed for four language performance measures tapping into language productivity, syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, and verbal facility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite individual variability in performance, mean scores were close to median scores for most measures, suggesting a symmetrical distribution. As expected, all four language performance measures were significantly different across the four elicitation tasks. The personal narrative task elicited the longest samples, with the highest verbal fluency. In contrast, both lexical diversity and syntactic complexity were the strongest in response to the fable retell and the moral dilemma tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This investigation provides speech-language pathologists with an overview of how task-related factors may impact adolescent language performance. These findings may be used to support their clinical decision-making processes in choosing a suitable discourse task when conducting a comprehensive spoken language assessment. Three hypothetical case examples are used to illustrate the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25761768.</p>","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":" ","pages":"838-852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Comprehensive spoken language assessment should include the evaluation of language use in naturalistic contexts. Discourse elicitation and analysis provides the opportunity for such an evaluation to occur. In this article, our overall aim was to describe adolescents' language performance on four elicitation tasks and determine if there are task-related differences across the elicitation tasks.

Method: Forty-four typically developing adolescents with ages ranging from 12;2 to 17;11 (years;months; M = 15;2; 21 boys and 23 girls) participated in the study. They completed four spoken discourse tasks: (a) story generation using a wordless picture book, (b) fable retell, (c) six personal narratives in response to emotion-based prompts, and (d) monologic response to two stories that contained a moral dilemma. Responses were transcribed and analyzed for four language performance measures tapping into language productivity, syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, and verbal facility.

Results: Despite individual variability in performance, mean scores were close to median scores for most measures, suggesting a symmetrical distribution. As expected, all four language performance measures were significantly different across the four elicitation tasks. The personal narrative task elicited the longest samples, with the highest verbal fluency. In contrast, both lexical diversity and syntactic complexity were the strongest in response to the fable retell and the moral dilemma tasks.

Conclusions: This investigation provides speech-language pathologists with an overview of how task-related factors may impact adolescent language performance. These findings may be used to support their clinical decision-making processes in choosing a suitable discourse task when conducting a comprehensive spoken language assessment. Three hypothetical case examples are used to illustrate the decision-making process.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25761768.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察青少年在四种诱导任务中的话语制作语言表现。
目的:综合口语评估应包括在自然语境中对语言使用的评估。话语诱导和分析为这种评估提供了机会。本文的总体目标是描述青少年在四项诱导任务中的语言表现,并确定在不同的诱导任务中是否存在与任务相关的差异:44名发育典型的青少年参加了研究,他们的年龄在12;2至17;11(岁;月;男=15;2;21名男孩和23名女孩)之间。他们完成了四项口语对话任务:(a) 使用无字图画书生成故事;(b) 寓言复述;(c) 根据情感提示进行六次个人叙述;(d) 对两个包含道德困境的故事进行单语回答。我们对学生的回答进行了转录,并对四项语言成绩测量指标进行了分析,这四项指标分别是语言生产率、句法复杂性、词汇多样性和语言能力:尽管个体表现存在差异,但大多数测量指标的平均分都接近中位数,表明存在对称分布。不出所料,所有四项语言表达指标在四项诱导任务中都有显著差异。个人叙事任务的样本最长,语言流畅度最高。相比之下,在寓言复述和道德两难任务中,词汇多样性和句法复杂性都是最强的:这项调查为语言病理学家提供了一个与任务相关的因素如何影响青少年语言表现的概览。在进行综合口语评估时,这些发现可用于支持临床决策过程,帮助他们选择合适的话语任务。三个假设案例用于说明决策过程。补充材料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25761768。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
期刊最新文献
Parents Plus: A Parent-Implemented Intervention for Preschool Children With Developmental Language Disorders. Parent Teaching Using the Enhanced Moved by Reading to Accelerate Comprehension in English Intelligent Tutoring System to Teach Question-Asking During Shared Book Reading in Latino Families. Social-Emotional Functioning of Children With Different Hearing Status and Diverse Cultural Background. Extending Complexity to Word-Final Position via Telepractice: Intervention Effects for English-Speaking Children With Speech Sound Disorder. Internal State Terms in the Narratives of Bilingual Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Role of Microstructure and Macrostructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1