Impact of preaneurysmal M1 length in unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm: mid-term outcome and single-center experience

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurochirurgie Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101569
Lucas Ribeiro , Antoine Devalckeneer , Martin Bretzner , Philippe Bourgeois , Jean-Paul Lejeune , Rabih Aboukais
{"title":"Impact of preaneurysmal M1 length in unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm: mid-term outcome and single-center experience","authors":"Lucas Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Antoine Devalckeneer ,&nbsp;Martin Bretzner ,&nbsp;Philippe Bourgeois ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Lejeune ,&nbsp;Rabih Aboukais","doi":"10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was design to investigate the surgical and functional outcome based on the preaneurysmal M<sub>1</sub> length for unruptured MCA aneurysm.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Among 250 consecutive patients with unruptured aneurysms operated in our institution between 2015 and 2017, 72 were MCA aneurysms. Risk factors for IR (i.e., intraoperative rupture) were investigated including age, sex, preaneurysmal M<sub>1</sub> length, maximal MCA aneurysm diameter, neck size, aneurysm shape, sphenoid ridge proximation sign. Outcome was measured at discharge, 1 yr and last follow-up. Outcome was compared according to the preaneurysmal M<sub>1</sub> length.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 68 patients included, five patients (7.3%) suffered IR. Mean maximal diameter of MCA aneurysm (7.9 mm ± 3.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.8; p = 0.01) was significantly associated with IR risk. Mean M<sub>1</sub> length seemed to be shorter in the IR group although not statistically significant (16.2 mm ± 5.1 vs. 11.5 mm ± 4.8; p = 0.053). Mid-term outcome was favorable for all patients at last follow-up but was worsen in case of short preaneurysmal M<sub>1</sub> segment (10.7 mm ± 4.8 vs. 16.4 mm ± 5.3, p = 0.02). Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved for sixty-nine patients (95.5%) with 6.9% of early postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The microsurgical treatment of unruptured MCA aneurysm was associated with favorable mid-term outcome in all patients and high rates of complete occlusion. Aneurysm size was significantly associated with the intraoperative rupture risk for unruptured MCA aneurysm and patients with a short preaneurysmal M1 segment seemed to have a greater risk of intraoperative rupture although not statistically significant. Short preaneurysmal M1 patients had worsen mid-term outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51141,"journal":{"name":"Neurochirurgie","volume":"70 4","pages":"Article 101569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028377024000407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study was design to investigate the surgical and functional outcome based on the preaneurysmal M1 length for unruptured MCA aneurysm.

Methods

Among 250 consecutive patients with unruptured aneurysms operated in our institution between 2015 and 2017, 72 were MCA aneurysms. Risk factors for IR (i.e., intraoperative rupture) were investigated including age, sex, preaneurysmal M1 length, maximal MCA aneurysm diameter, neck size, aneurysm shape, sphenoid ridge proximation sign. Outcome was measured at discharge, 1 yr and last follow-up. Outcome was compared according to the preaneurysmal M1 length.

Results

Among 68 patients included, five patients (7.3%) suffered IR. Mean maximal diameter of MCA aneurysm (7.9 mm ± 3.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.8; p = 0.01) was significantly associated with IR risk. Mean M1 length seemed to be shorter in the IR group although not statistically significant (16.2 mm ± 5.1 vs. 11.5 mm ± 4.8; p = 0.053). Mid-term outcome was favorable for all patients at last follow-up but was worsen in case of short preaneurysmal M1 segment (10.7 mm ± 4.8 vs. 16.4 mm ± 5.3, p = 0.02). Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved for sixty-nine patients (95.5%) with 6.9% of early postoperative complications.

Conclusions

The microsurgical treatment of unruptured MCA aneurysm was associated with favorable mid-term outcome in all patients and high rates of complete occlusion. Aneurysm size was significantly associated with the intraoperative rupture risk for unruptured MCA aneurysm and patients with a short preaneurysmal M1 segment seemed to have a greater risk of intraoperative rupture although not statistically significant. Short preaneurysmal M1 patients had worsen mid-term outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未破裂大脑中动脉动脉瘤瘤前 M1 长度的影响:中期结果和单中心经验。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨基于瘤前M1长度的未破裂MCA动脉瘤的手术和功能预后:2015年至2017年在我院手术的250例未破裂动脉瘤连续患者中,72例为MCA动脉瘤。调查了IR(即术中破裂)的风险因素,包括年龄、性别、瘤前M1长度、MCA动脉瘤最大直径、瘤颈大小、动脉瘤形状、蝶骨脊近端征。结果在出院、1 年和最后一次随访时测量。根据瘤前M1长度对结果进行比较:在纳入的 68 名患者中,有 5 名患者(7.3%)患有 IR。MCA动脉瘤的平均最大直径(7.9 mm ± 3.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.8; p = 0.01)与IR风险显著相关。IR组的平均M1长度似乎更短(16.2 mm ± 5.1 vs. 11.5 mm ± 4.8; p = 0.053),但无统计学意义。在最后一次随访时,所有患者的中期预后均良好,但如果瘤前 M1 段较短,预后则会恶化(10.7 mm ± 4.8 vs. 16.4 mm ± 5.3,p = 0.02)。69例患者(95.5%)实现了动脉瘤完全闭塞,术后早期并发症发生率为6.9%:结论:显微手术治疗未破裂的 MCA 动脉瘤对所有患者都有良好的中期疗效,完全闭塞率高。动脉瘤大小与未破裂的 MCA 动脉瘤的术中破裂风险显著相关,瘤前 M1 节段较短的患者术中破裂风险似乎更大,但无统计学意义。瘤前 M1 段较短的患者中期预后较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurochirurgie
Neurochirurgie 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Neurochirurgie publishes articles on treatment, teaching and research, neurosurgery training and the professional aspects of our discipline, and also the history and progress of neurosurgery. It focuses on pathologies of the head, spine and central and peripheral nervous systems and their vascularization. All aspects of the specialty are dealt with: trauma, tumor, degenerative disease, infection, vascular pathology, and radiosurgery, and pediatrics. Transversal studies are also welcome: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurology, neuropediatrics, psychiatry, neuropsychology, physical medicine and neurologic rehabilitation, neuro-anesthesia, neurologic intensive care, neuroradiology, functional exploration, neuropathology, neuro-ophthalmology, otoneurology, maxillofacial surgery, neuro-endocrinology and spine surgery. Technical and methodological aspects are also taken onboard: diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, methods for assessing results, epidemiology, surgical, interventional and radiological techniques, simulations and pathophysiological hypotheses, and educational tools. The editorial board may refuse submissions that fail to meet the journal''s aims and scope; such studies will not be peer-reviewed, and the editor in chief will promptly inform the corresponding author, so as not to delay submission to a more suitable journal. With a view to attracting an international audience of both readers and writers, Neurochirurgie especially welcomes articles in English, and gives priority to original studies. Other kinds of article - reviews, case reports, technical notes and meta-analyses - are equally published. Every year, a special edition is dedicated to the topic selected by the French Society of Neurosurgery for its annual report.
期刊最新文献
Lies, damned lies, and statistical populations Staged ECA-RA-MCA bypass and interventional trapping: application of hybrid vascular reconstruction of ruptured complex tandem aneurysms Natural course of the acute unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissections which show pearl-and-string sign Understanding statistical populations and inferences Neurosurgery in a Pacific archipelago: how to provide optimal care. Experience of the opening of a first-line neurosurgery department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1