Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948
Kaitlyn Wilson , Kanza Batool , Tz-Yu Duan , Catherine Ann Cameron , Kang Lee
{"title":"Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests","authors":"Kaitlyn Wilson ,&nbsp;Kanza Batool ,&nbsp;Tz-Yu Duan ,&nbsp;Catherine Ann Cameron ,&nbsp;Kang Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the relationship between parental reports of children’s behavioral problems and their cheating behaviors on simulated academic tests, addressing a significant gap in understanding early childhood academic cheating and its potential links to broader behavioral issues. We hypothesized that children’s early problem behaviors would be predictive of their academic cheating. To test these hypotheses, children aged 4 to 12 years took part in six unmonitored academic tests that measured their cheating behaviors while their parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire elsewhere. Separate hierarchical linear regressions revealed that children’s problem behaviors, as reported by parents, overall significantly predict children’s cheating behaviors even after accounting for demographic variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, and parental religiosity. Specifically, the Conduct Problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire showed a significant and unique association with children’s cheating behaviors above and beyond the common contributions of all predictors. However, the Child Behavior Checklist scores and the scores on the other Strengths and Difficulties subscales were not significantly or uniquely related to cheating. These findings offer new insight into simulated childhood academic cheating and its relation to problem behaviors observed by parents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524000882/pdfft?md5=3ba2fe47b37d77e97dd9a8908e669ce7&pid=1-s2.0-S0022096524000882-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524000882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between parental reports of children’s behavioral problems and their cheating behaviors on simulated academic tests, addressing a significant gap in understanding early childhood academic cheating and its potential links to broader behavioral issues. We hypothesized that children’s early problem behaviors would be predictive of their academic cheating. To test these hypotheses, children aged 4 to 12 years took part in six unmonitored academic tests that measured their cheating behaviors while their parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire elsewhere. Separate hierarchical linear regressions revealed that children’s problem behaviors, as reported by parents, overall significantly predict children’s cheating behaviors even after accounting for demographic variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, and parental religiosity. Specifically, the Conduct Problems subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire showed a significant and unique association with children’s cheating behaviors above and beyond the common contributions of all predictors. However, the Child Behavior Checklist scores and the scores on the other Strengths and Difficulties subscales were not significantly or uniquely related to cheating. These findings offer new insight into simulated childhood academic cheating and its relation to problem behaviors observed by parents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
童年时期的作弊行为探索父母报告的问题行为与模拟学术测试中的不诚实行为之间的联系
本研究调查了家长对儿童行为问题的报告与他们在模拟学术测试中的作弊行为之间的关系,以解决在了解儿童早期学术作弊及其与更广泛的行为问题的潜在联系方面存在的重大差距。我们假设,儿童的早期问题行为可以预测他们的学业作弊行为。为了验证这些假设,4 至 12 岁的儿童参加了六次不受监控的学业测试,以测量他们的作弊行为,而他们的父母则在其他地方填写儿童行为检查表和优势与困难问卷。分别进行的分层线性回归显示,即使考虑了年龄、性别、种族和父母宗教信仰等人口统计学变量,父母报告的儿童问题行为仍能显著预测儿童的作弊行为。具体来说,"优势与困难问卷 "中的 "行为问题 "分量表显示出与儿童作弊行为之间存在着显著而独特的关联,这种关联超出了所有预测因素的共同作用。然而,儿童行为检查表得分和其他优势与困难分量表得分与作弊行为没有显著或独特的关系。这些发现为模拟儿童学业作弊及其与家长观察到的问题行为之间的关系提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between psychosocial adversity and inhibitory control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of children growing up in extreme poverty Out of sight, not out of mind: New pupillometric evidence on object permanence in a sample of 10- and 12-month-old German infants Culturally and linguistically diverse children’s retention of spoken narratives encoded in quiet and in babble noise Attention–language interface in Multilingual Assessment instrument for Narratives Perspective matters in goal-predictive gaze shifts during action observation: Results from 6-, 9-, and 12-month-olds and adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1