The role of ontologies in smart contracts: A systematic literature review

IF 10.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Industrial Information Integration Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100630
Johnny Alvarado Dominguez, Silvio Gonnet, Marcela Vegetti
{"title":"The role of ontologies in smart contracts: A systematic literature review","authors":"Johnny Alvarado Dominguez,&nbsp;Silvio Gonnet,&nbsp;Marcela Vegetti","doi":"10.1016/j.jii.2024.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this systematic literature review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of how ontologies address current Smart Contract challenges, identify application scenarios, and present tools and technologies associated with their use. This systematic literature review (SLR), following Kitchenham's methodology, analyses peer-reviewed articles from 2015 to August 2022 from databases such as Scopus, IEEE, Science Direct, Springer Link and ACM. Of the 501 publications identified, 21 are selected for in-depth review based on inclusion, exclusion and quality assessment criteria. The results of this SLR show that ontologies provide solutions to the challenges faced by Smart Contracts mainly at the creation stage. They allow the terms of the contract and the roles of the parties to be defined. Ontologies also enable the development of Smart Contract templates. This facilitates their use by people without technical programming expertise. Despite these potential solutions to the challenges that Smart Contracts face throughout their lifecycle, they lack verification. This increases the vulnerabilities to which Smart Contracts are exposed. Developing validation and verification tools could facilitate using ontologies to create Smart Contracts for different real-world cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100630"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452414X24000748","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this systematic literature review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of how ontologies address current Smart Contract challenges, identify application scenarios, and present tools and technologies associated with their use. This systematic literature review (SLR), following Kitchenham's methodology, analyses peer-reviewed articles from 2015 to August 2022 from databases such as Scopus, IEEE, Science Direct, Springer Link and ACM. Of the 501 publications identified, 21 are selected for in-depth review based on inclusion, exclusion and quality assessment criteria. The results of this SLR show that ontologies provide solutions to the challenges faced by Smart Contracts mainly at the creation stage. They allow the terms of the contract and the roles of the parties to be defined. Ontologies also enable the development of Smart Contract templates. This facilitates their use by people without technical programming expertise. Despite these potential solutions to the challenges that Smart Contracts face throughout their lifecycle, they lack verification. This increases the vulnerabilities to which Smart Contracts are exposed. Developing validation and verification tools could facilitate using ontologies to create Smart Contracts for different real-world cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体在智能合约中的作用:系统文献综述
本系统文献综述旨在全面了解本体如何应对当前的智能合约挑战,确定应用场景,并介绍与其使用相关的工具和技术。本系统性文献综述(SLR)采用 Kitchenham 的方法,分析了 Scopus、IEEE、Science Direct、Springer Link 和 ACM 等数据库中 2015 年至 2022 年 8 月的同行评议文章。在确定的 501 篇出版物中,根据纳入、排除和质量评估标准选出 21 篇进行深入审查。本次 SLR 的结果表明,本体为智能合约主要在创建阶段面临的挑战提供了解决方案。本体允许定义合同条款和各方角色。本体论还有助于开发智能合约模板。这为没有编程技术专长的人使用智能合约提供了便利。尽管智能合约在其整个生命周期中面临着这些潜在的挑战,但它们缺乏验证。这增加了智能合约面临的漏洞。开发验证和确认工具可以促进本体的使用,从而为不同的实际情况创建智能合约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Information Integration
Journal of Industrial Information Integration Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
13.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Information Integration focuses on the industry's transition towards industrial integration and informatization, covering not only hardware and software but also information integration. It serves as a platform for promoting advances in industrial information integration, addressing challenges, issues, and solutions in an interdisciplinary forum for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. The Journal of Industrial Information Integration welcomes papers on foundational, technical, and practical aspects of industrial information integration, emphasizing the complex and cross-disciplinary topics that arise in industrial integration. Techniques from mathematical science, computer science, computer engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, manufacturing engineering, and engineering management are crucial in this context.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing mixed gas discrimination in e-nose system: Sparse recurrent neural networks using transient current fluctuation of SMO array sensor An effective farmer-centred mobile intelligence solution using lightweight deep learning for integrated wheat pest management TRIPLE: A blockchain-based digital twin framework for cyber–physical systems security Industrial information integration in deep space exploration and exploitation: Architecture and technology Interoperability levels and challenges of digital twins in cyber–physical systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1